1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Navigation: Shedding light on stellate cells

  1. Andrew S Alexander  Is a corresponding author
  2. Michael E Hasselmo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Boston University, United States
Insight
  • Cited 0
  • Views 1,006
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2018;7:e41041 doi: 10.7554/eLife.41041

Abstract

The relationship between grid cells and two types of neurons found in the medial entorhinal cortex has been clarified.

Main text

Most people can remember the floorplan of their current home and the layout of their local supermarket. They might also be able to create a virtual map of their current location, their home and the supermarket, which allows them to mentally navigate from one place to the next. Our sense of location depends on a network of regions in the brain, including the hippocampus and its neighbor, the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC).

The different types of neurons within these structures work together to form a sort of inbuilt GPS that tracks our position relative to other objects or places in the environment. In the hippocampus, place cells are activated when an animal occupies a single position in the environment (O'Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971). In the MEC, head direction cells and border cells become active when an animal faces a particular direction or is near a border (Sargolini et al., 2006; Solstad et al., 2008). The MEC also contains grid cells that – much like the black squares on a chess board – represent multiple equally-spaced locations in an environment via their firing patterns (Hafting et al., 2005).

Previous research has shown that the inputs of the MEC into the hippocampus – in particular from the grid cells – are potentially crucial for the spatial and memory functions (Schlesiger et al., 2015). Grid cells reside predominantly in an area of the MEC known as layer II, where two morphologically distinct sub-populations of neurons, the stellate and pyramidal cells, exist.

Both stellate and pyramidal cells have different physiological properties and connect to the hippocampus through different pathways (Alonso and Klink, 1993). Stellate cells form a prominent connection directly into multiple sub-regions of the hippocampus, while the density of the connections between the pyramidal neurons and the hippocampus is significantly less. However, the exact role of stellate and pyramidal cells has so far remained unclear.

Several studies have reported that both stellate and pyramidal cells could be grid cells, while others found that the proportion of grid cells within the stellate sub-population was virtually nonexistent (Domnisoru et al., 2013; Schmidt-Hieber and Häusser, 2013; Tang et al., 2014). Thus, it has remained unclear whether MEC neurons that exhibit grid firing or other spatial responses belong to the sub-class of MEC layer II cells that do indeed project into the hippocampus.

Now, in eLife, May-Britt Moser and colleagues at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology – including David Rowland as first author – report new insights into these cells (Rowland et al., 2018). Using sophisticated genetic tools paired with electrical recordings from single neurons in free-moving mice, they could assess the relationship between stellate and pyramidal cell sub-populations, and other known spatial coding neurons within the MEC layer II.

Rowland et al. used a technique called optogenetics, in which genetically modified neurons that produce light-sensitive proteins can either be activated or silenced with light. The mouse model used in the experiments expressed a light-sensitive protein called ArchT in the stellate cells of layer II, which meant that these neurons could be shut off by exposing them to light of a specific wavelength.

Rowland et al. measured the activity of layer II neurons while the mice freely explored an open space. Then, the same neurons were recorded while simultaneously exposed to light (a process referred to as ‘phototagging’). All cells that were silenced within moments of the light onset were ‘tagged’ as layer II stellate cells. This allowed a comparison of firing properties during the free-foraging session between the tagged stellate neurons and untagged populations composed primarily of pyramidal cells.

The results showed that the tagged stellate cell population had similar, if not stronger, spatial firing properties compared to the untagged cell population. Grid cells existed in similar numbers in both the tagged stellate and untagged populations. This suggests that the stellate cells projecting into the hippocampus include cells from a range of functional cell types and thus, may help the hippocampus to process information about location.

The work of Rowland et al. has resolved discrepancies between previous reports and brought to light important questions. For example, how do stellate grid cells, pyramidal grid cells and other types of spatial cells shape spatial processing and memory, and are there any differences between them? To what degree do these morphologically distinct, yet functionally overlapping, sub-populations depend on one another? These questions aside, the latest work demonstrates the power of phototagging as a means to better characterize circuit-specific projections within the brain regions that support navigation.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrew S Alexander

    Andrew S Alexander is in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, United States

    For correspondence
    asalexan@bu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1735-3449
  2. Michael E Hasselmo

    Michael E Hasselmo is in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, United States

    For correspondence
    hasselmo@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9925-6377

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: September 14, 2018 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2018, Alexander et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,006
    Page views
  • 98
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Sonia Taïb et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Peripheral nerves are vascularized by a dense network of blood vessels to guarantee their complex function. Despite the crucial role of vascularization to ensure nerve homeostasis and regeneration, the mechanisms governing nerve invasion by blood vessels remain poorly understood. We found, in mice, that the sciatic nerve invasion by blood vessels begins around embryonic day 16 and continues until birth. Interestingly, intra-nervous blood vessel density significantly decreases during post-natal period, starting from P10. We show that, while the axon guidance molecule Netrin-1 promotes nerve invasion by blood vessels via the endothelial receptor UNC5B during embryogenesis, myelinated Schwann cells negatively control intra-nervous vascularization during post-natal period.

    1. Neuroscience
    Christian Brodbeck et al.
    Research Article

    Speech processing is highly incremental. It is widely accepted that human listeners continuously use the linguistic context to anticipate upcoming concepts, words, and phonemes. However, previous evidence supports two seemingly contradictory models of how a predictive context is integrated with the bottom-up sensory input: Classic psycholinguistic paradigms suggest a two-stage process, in which acoustic input initially leads to local, context-independent representations, which are then quickly integrated with contextual constraints. This contrasts with the view that the brain constructs a single coherent, unified interpretation of the input, which fully integrates available information across representational hierarchies, and thus uses contextual constraints to modulate even the earliest sensory representations. To distinguish these hypotheses, we tested magnetoencephalography responses to continuous narrative speech for signatures of local and unified predictive models. Results provide evidence that listeners employ both types of models in parallel. Two local context models uniquely predict some part of early neural responses, one based on sublexical phoneme sequences, and one based on the phonemes in the current word alone; at the same time, even early responses to phonemes also reflect a unified model that incorporates sentence level constraints to predict upcoming phonemes. Neural source localization places the anatomical origins of the different predictive models in non-identical parts of the superior temporal lobes bilaterally, with the right hemisphere showing a relative preference for more local models. These results suggest that speech processing recruits both local and unified predictive models in parallel, reconciling previous disparate findings. Parallel models might make the perceptual system more robust, facilitate processing of unexpected inputs, and serve a function in language acquisition.