Mechanisms of opening and closing of the bacterial replicative helicase

  1. Jillian Chase
  2. Andrew Catalano
  3. Alex J Noble
  4. Edward T Eng
  5. Paul D B Olinares
  6. Kelley Molloy
  7. Danaya Pakotiprapha
  8. Martin Samuels
  9. Brian Chait
  10. Amedee des Georges  Is a corresponding author
  11. David Jeruzalmi  Is a corresponding author
  1. City College of New York, United States
  2. New York Structural Biology Center, United States
  3. The Rockefeller University, United States
  4. Mahidol University, Thailand
  5. Harvard University, United States

Abstract

Assembly of bacterial ring-shaped hexameric replicative helicases on single-stranded (ss) DNA requires specialized loading factors. However, mechanisms implemented by these factors during opening and closing of the helicase, which enable and restrict access to an internal chamber, are not known. Here, we investigate these mechanisms in the Escherichia coli DnaB helicase•bacteriophage λ helicase loader (λP) complex. We show that five copies of λP bind at DnaB subunit interfaces and reconfigure the helicase into an open spiral conformation that is intermediate to previously observed closed ring and closed spiral forms; reconfiguration also produces openings large enough to admit ssDNA into the inner chamber. The helicase is also observed in a restrained inactive configuration that poises it to close on activating signal, and transition to the translocation state. Our findings provide insights into helicase opening, delivery to the origin and ssDNA entry, and closing in preparation for translocation.

Data availability

Cryogenic electron microscopy maps have been deposited with the EMDB under accession number EMD-7076Atomic coordinates have been deposited with the PDB under the accession code 6BBM

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jillian Chase

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, City College of New York, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Andrew Catalano

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, City College of New York, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alex J Noble

    National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8634-2279
  4. Edward T Eng

    National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8014-7269
  5. Paul D B Olinares

    Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kelley Molloy

    Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Danaya Pakotiprapha

    Department of Biochemistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5017-8283
  8. Martin Samuels

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Brian Chait

    Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Amedee des Georges

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, City College of New York, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    amedee.desgeorges@asrc.cuny.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. David Jeruzalmi

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, City College of New York, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    dj@ccny.cuny.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5886-1370

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM084162)

  • David Jeruzalmi

National Science Foundation (MCB 1818255)

  • David Jeruzalmi

National Institutes of Health (5G12MD007603-30)

  • David Jeruzalmi

Simons Foundation (SF349247)

  • Edward T Eng

Agouron Institute (F00316)

  • Edward T Eng

National Institutes of Health (OD019994)

  • Edward T Eng

Department of Education and Training (PA200A150068)

  • Jillian Chase

National Institutes of Health (P41 GM103314)

  • Brian Chait

National Institutes of Health (P41 GM109824)

  • Brian Chait

National Institutes of Health (F32GM128303)

  • Alex J Noble

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Michael R Botchan, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 15, 2018
  2. Accepted: December 21, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 24, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 26, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Chase et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,038
    views
  • 606
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jillian Chase
  2. Andrew Catalano
  3. Alex J Noble
  4. Edward T Eng
  5. Paul D B Olinares
  6. Kelley Molloy
  7. Danaya Pakotiprapha
  8. Martin Samuels
  9. Brian Chait
  10. Amedee des Georges
  11. David Jeruzalmi
(2018)
Mechanisms of opening and closing of the bacterial replicative helicase
eLife 7:e41140.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41140

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41140

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Isabelle Petit-Hartlein, Annelise Vermot ... Franck Fieschi
    Research Article

    NADPH oxidases (NOX) are transmembrane proteins, widely spread in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Eukaryotes use the ROS products for innate immune defense and signaling in critical (patho)physiological processes. Despite the recent structures of human NOX isoforms, the activation of electron transfer remains incompletely understood. SpNOX, a homolog from Streptococcus pneumoniae, can serves as a robust model for exploring electron transfers in the NOX family thanks to its constitutive activity. Crystal structures of SpNOX full-length and dehydrogenase (DH) domain constructs are revealed here. The isolated DH domain acts as a flavin reductase, and both constructs use either NADPH or NADH as substrate. Our findings suggest that hydride transfer from NAD(P)H to FAD is the rate-limiting step in electron transfer. We identify significance of F397 in nicotinamide access to flavin isoalloxazine and confirm flavin binding contributions from both DH and Transmembrane (TM) domains. Comparison with related enzymes suggests that distal access to heme may influence the final electron acceptor, while the relative position of DH and TM does not necessarily correlate with activity, contrary to previous suggestions. It rather suggests requirement of an internal rearrangement, within the DH domain, to switch from a resting to an active state. Thus, SpNOX appears to be a good model of active NOX2, which allows us to propose an explanation for NOX2’s requirement for activation.