Mechanisms of opening and closing of the bacterial replicative helicase

  1. Jillian Chase
  2. Andrew Catalano
  3. Alex J Noble
  4. Edward T Eng
  5. Paul D B Olinares
  6. Kelley Molloy
  7. Danaya Pakotiprapha
  8. Martin Samuels
  9. Brian Chait
  10. Amedee des Georges  Is a corresponding author
  11. David Jeruzalmi  Is a corresponding author
  1. City College of New York, United States
  2. New York Structural Biology Center, United States
  3. The Rockefeller University, United States
  4. Mahidol University, Thailand
  5. Harvard University, United States

Abstract

Assembly of bacterial ring-shaped hexameric replicative helicases on single-stranded (ss) DNA requires specialized loading factors. However, mechanisms implemented by these factors during opening and closing of the helicase, which enable and restrict access to an internal chamber, are not known. Here, we investigate these mechanisms in the Escherichia coli DnaB helicase•bacteriophage λ helicase loader (λP) complex. We show that five copies of λP bind at DnaB subunit interfaces and reconfigure the helicase into an open spiral conformation that is intermediate to previously observed closed ring and closed spiral forms; reconfiguration also produces openings large enough to admit ssDNA into the inner chamber. The helicase is also observed in a restrained inactive configuration that poises it to close on activating signal, and transition to the translocation state. Our findings provide insights into helicase opening, delivery to the origin and ssDNA entry, and closing in preparation for translocation.

Data availability

Cryogenic electron microscopy maps have been deposited with the EMDB under accession number EMD-7076Atomic coordinates have been deposited with the PDB under the accession code 6BBM

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jillian Chase

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, City College of New York, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Andrew Catalano

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, City College of New York, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alex J Noble

    National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8634-2279
  4. Edward T Eng

    National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8014-7269
  5. Paul D B Olinares

    Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kelley Molloy

    Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Danaya Pakotiprapha

    Department of Biochemistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5017-8283
  8. Martin Samuels

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Brian Chait

    Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Amedee des Georges

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, City College of New York, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    amedee.desgeorges@asrc.cuny.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. David Jeruzalmi

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, City College of New York, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    dj@ccny.cuny.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5886-1370

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM084162)

  • David Jeruzalmi

National Science Foundation (MCB 1818255)

  • David Jeruzalmi

National Institutes of Health (5G12MD007603-30)

  • David Jeruzalmi

Simons Foundation (SF349247)

  • Edward T Eng

Agouron Institute (F00316)

  • Edward T Eng

National Institutes of Health (OD019994)

  • Edward T Eng

Department of Education and Training (PA200A150068)

  • Jillian Chase

National Institutes of Health (P41 GM103314)

  • Brian Chait

National Institutes of Health (P41 GM109824)

  • Brian Chait

National Institutes of Health (F32GM128303)

  • Alex J Noble

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Chase et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,214
    views
  • 622
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jillian Chase
  2. Andrew Catalano
  3. Alex J Noble
  4. Edward T Eng
  5. Paul D B Olinares
  6. Kelley Molloy
  7. Danaya Pakotiprapha
  8. Martin Samuels
  9. Brian Chait
  10. Amedee des Georges
  11. David Jeruzalmi
(2018)
Mechanisms of opening and closing of the bacterial replicative helicase
eLife 7:e41140.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41140

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41140

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Jonathan G Van Vranken, Jiaming Li ... Devin K Schweppe
    Research Article

    In response to an ever-increasing demand of new small molecules therapeutics, numerous chemical and genetic tools have been developed to interrogate compound mechanism of action. Owing to its ability to approximate compound-dependent changes in thermal stability, the proteome-wide thermal shift assay has emerged as a powerful tool in this arsenal. The most recent iterations have drastically improved the overall efficiency of these assays, providing an opportunity to screen compounds at a previously unprecedented rate. Taking advantage of this advance, we quantified more than one million thermal stability measurements in response to multiple classes of therapeutic and tool compounds (96 compounds in living cells and 70 compounds in lysates). When interrogating the dataset as a whole, approximately 80% of compounds (with quantifiable targets) caused a significant change in the thermal stability of an annotated target. There was also a wealth of evidence portending off-target engagement despite the extensive use of the compounds in the laboratory and/or clinic. Finally, the combined application of cell- and lysate-based assays, aided in the classification of primary (direct ligand binding) and secondary (indirect) changes in thermal stability. Overall, this study highlights the value of these assays in the drug development process by affording an unbiased and reliable assessment of compound mechanism of action.