A shows the location of the selection regimes identified in an OU model of ECV predicted by body mass. Panel B shows the corresponding optimum regression lines representing the various selection …
Figure 1 displays the same results, but only for great apes. Panel A shows the location of the selection regimes. Panel B shows the optimum regression lines representing the various selection …
Panel (A) shows a scatter plot of primate ECV and body mass data. Panel (B) shows the topology of the great ape portion of the hominin phylogeny used in the BayesModelS analyses of hominin ECV. …
Panel (A) shows a scatter plot of primate ECV and body mass data. Panel (B) shows the topology of the great ape portion of the alternate hominin phylogeny used in the BayesModelS analyses of hominin …
(A) Brain size deviation was calculated as the difference between the mean BayesModelS prediction (made while excluding all hominin data from analysis and using the hominin phylogeny) and the …
(A) Brain size deviation was calculated as the difference between the mean BayesModelS prediction (made while excluding all hominin data from analysis and using the alternate hominin phylogeny) and …
Vertical bars represent the observed values.
Results for other species are given in Source data 1. Because BayesModelS requires a predictor variable, we assigned each species a random number for the predictor trait. This resulted in the …
(A and B) correspond to the OU weighted predictor model of neocortex volume predicted by the rest-of-brain. (C and D) correspond to the OU unweighted predictor model of cerebellum volume predicted …
All values are from Robson and Wood (2008).
Species | ECV (mL) | Sample size | Female body mass (kg) | Sample size |
---|---|---|---|---|
Australopithecus africanus | 464.00 | 8 | 30 | 7 |
Homo erectus | 969.00 | 40 | 57 | 4 |
Homo habilis | 609.00 | 6 | 32 | 2 |
Homo rudolfensis | 726.00 | 3 | 51 | 2 |
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis | 1426.00 | 23 | 65 | 7 |
Homo sapiens | 1478.00 | 66 | 57 | 36 |
Paranthropus boisei | 481.00 | 10 | 34 | 1 |
Paranthropus robustus | 563.00 | 2 | 32 | 2 |
Australopithecus afarensis | 458.00 | 6 | 30 | 4 |
Brain trait | Value | Source | Notes | Dataset |
---|---|---|---|---|
ECV | 1478.00 mL | (Robson and Wood, 2008) | Composite of values from 66 fossil specimens from locations across Eurasia and africa | 1 |
Brain volume | 1267.65 mL | (Barton and Harvey, 2000) | Average of measurements of modern human brains | 2 |
Brain volume | 1251.85 mL | (Stephan et al., 1981) | Measurement of modern human brain | 3 |
Model parameter | Prior distribution |
---|---|
α | Half-cauchy with scale factor 1. Fixed at 0 in Brownian model. |
σ2 | Half-cauchy with scale factor 0.1 |
β | Normal distribution with standard deviation = 0.5, mean = slope of linear model of trait and predictor data |
θ | Normal distribution with standard deviation = 1, mean = intercept of linear model of trait and predictor data |
Number of shifts per branch | Fixed at one |
Branch-wise shift probability | Uniform |
Number of shifts | Conditional Poisson distribution* with mean = 0.1*number of edges on phylogeny and maximum = number of edges on phylogeny. Fixed at 0 in Brownian model. |
Location of shift along branch | Uniform |
*Calculated using ‘cdpois’ option in bayou.
True value (ml) | Corrected prediction (ml) | Difference (ml) | % difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Australopithecus africanus | 464.00 | 294.73 | 169.27 | 57.43 |
Homo erectus | 969.00 | 438.24 | 530.76 | 121.11 |
Homo habilis | 609.00 | 306.83 | 302.17 | 98.48 |
Homo rudolfensis | 726.00 | 409.63 | 316.37 | 77.23 |
Homo sapiens | 1478.00 | 437.76 | 1040.24 | 237.63 |
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis | 1426.00 | 474.46 | 951.54 | 200.55 |
Paranthropus boisei | 481.00 | 319.00 | 162.00 | 50.78 |
Paranthropus robustus | 563.00 | 307.60 | 255.40 | 83.03 |
Australopithecus afarensis | 458.00 | 288.52 | 169.48 | 58.74 |
True value (ml) | Corrected prediction (ml) | Difference (ml) | % difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Australopithecus africanus | 464.00 | 288.18 | 175.82 | 61.00 |
Homo erectus | 969.00 | 431.04 | 537.96 | 124.81 |
Homo habilis | 609.00 | 300.16 | 308.84 | 102.89 |
Homo rudolfensis | 726.00 | 401.94 | 324.06 | 80.62 |
Homo sapiens | 1478.00 | 431.20 | 1046.80 | 242.76 |
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis | 1426.00 | 468.41 | 957.59 | 204.44 |
Paranthropus boisei | 481.00 | 311.41 | 169.59 | 54.46 |
Paranthropus robustus | 563.00 | 299.74 | 263.26 | 87.83 |
Australopithecus afarensis | 458.00 | 281.59 | 176.41 | 62.65 |
Species/Clade | Exceptional trait | Evidence |
---|---|---|
Alouatta | Reduced ECV relative to body mass | Shift in OU model |
Aotidae and Callitrichidae | Reduced ECV relative to body mass | Shift in OU model |
Cacajao calvus | Increased ECV relative to body mass | Outlier Detection |
Cebinae | Increased ECV relative to body mass | Shift in OU model |
Cebus albifrons | Increased cerebellum relative to body mass | Outlier detection |
Chiropotes satanas | Reduced ECV relative to body mass | Outlier Detection |
Colobinae | Reduced ECV relative to body mass | Shift in OU model |
Daubentonia madagascariensis | Increased ECV relative to body mass | Shift in OU model |
Gorilla beringei* | Reduced ECV relative to body mass | Outlier Detection |
Gorilla gorilla* | Reduced neocortex relative to body mass | Outlier Detection |
Lemuridae | Increased ECV relative to body mass | Shift in OU model |
Loris tardigradus | Reduced medulla relative to the rest of brain | Outlier Detection |
Microcebus murinus | Reduced medulla relative to the rest of brain | Outlier Detection |
Nasalis larvatus | Reduced neocortex relative to the rest of the brain | Shift in OU model |
Otolemur crassicaudatus | Reduced neocortex, cerebellum relative to body mass | Outlier Detection |
Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii | Increased ECV relative to body mass | Outlier Detection |
Pan troglodytes troglodytes | Reduced ECV relative to body mass | Outlier Detection |
*The dataset for this analysis did not contain any other gorilla species.
Representative Code.
Representative R code files for the bayou analyses ('representative bayou code.R'), BayesModelS analyses ('representative BayesModels code.R’), and pgls model fitting (‘pgls models.R’), are contained in the this file, along with the BayesModelS code (‘mult.spec.BayesModelS_v24.R’) and other necessary data files.
Bayou and BayesModelS Results Details.
Bayou Results details: Diagnostic plots giving details of chain convergence are provided in the 'bayou results summary.html' file along with detailed information on all OU and Brownain motion models for each trait and predictor pair. BayesModelS Results Details: Details of the BayesModelS results and diagnostic parameters of MCMC chains are given in the 'BayesModelS.results.csv' and 'BayesModelS.results.hominins.removed.csv’ files.
All data and trees used in our analyses.
Contains the following files: 1. data set 1.csv 2. data set 2.csv 3. data set 3.csv 4. consensus.tree.txt 5. tree.block.txt 6. grafted.tree.txt