Quantitative uniqueness of human brain evolution revealed through phylogenetic comparative analysis

  1. Ian Forrester Miller  Is a corresponding author
  2. Robert A Barton
  3. Charles L Nunn
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. University of Durham, United Kingdom
  3. Duke University, United States

Abstract

While the human brain is clearly large relative to body size, less is known about the timing of brain and brain component expansion within primates and the relative magnitude of volumetric increases. Using Bayesian phylogenetic comparative methods and data for both extant and fossil species, we identified that a distinct shift in brain-body scaling occurred as hominins diverged from other primates, and again as humans and Neanderthals diverged from other hominins. Within hominins, we detected a pattern of directional and accelerating evolution towards larger brains, consistent with a positive feedback process in the evolution of the human brain. Contrary to widespread assumptions, we found that the human neocortex is not exceptionally large relative to other brain structures. Instead, our analyses revealed a single increase in relative neocortex volume at the origin of haplorrhines, and an increase in relative cerebellar volume in apes.

Data availability

All data used in our analyses are provided as supplementary material.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ian Forrester Miller

    Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    ifmiller@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2673-9618
  2. Robert A Barton

    Department of Anthropology, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Charles L Nunn

    Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9330-2873

Funding

National Science Foundation (BCS-1355902)

  • Charles L Nunn

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jessica C. Thompson, YALE, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 22, 2018
  2. Accepted: January 29, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 31, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 18, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Miller et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,579
    views
  • 861
    downloads
  • 45
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ian Forrester Miller
  2. Robert A Barton
  3. Charles L Nunn
(2019)
Quantitative uniqueness of human brain evolution revealed through phylogenetic comparative analysis
eLife 8:e41250.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41250

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41250

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Erica R Kwiatkowski, Patrick Emery
    Insight

    Studies of the starlet sea anemone provide important insights into the early evolution of the circadian clock in animals.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Kenya Hitomi, Yoichiro Ishii, Bei-Wen Ying
    Research Article

    As the genome encodes the information crucial for cell growth, a sizeable genomic deficiency often causes a significant decrease in growth fitness. Whether and how the decreased growth fitness caused by genome reduction could be compensated by evolution was investigated here. Experimental evolution with an Escherichia coli strain carrying a reduced genome was conducted in multiple lineages for approximately 1000 generations. The growth rate, which largely declined due to genome reduction, was considerably recovered, associated with the improved carrying capacity. Genome mutations accumulated during evolution were significantly varied across the evolutionary lineages and were randomly localized on the reduced genome. Transcriptome reorganization showed a common evolutionary direction and conserved the chromosomal periodicity, regardless of highly diversified gene categories, regulons, and pathways enriched in the differentially expressed genes. Genome mutations and transcriptome reorganization caused by evolution, which were found to be dissimilar to those caused by genome reduction, must have followed divergent mechanisms in individual evolutionary lineages. Gene network reconstruction successfully identified three gene modules functionally differentiated, which were responsible for the evolutionary changes of the reduced genome in growth fitness, genome mutation, and gene expression, respectively. The diversity in evolutionary approaches improved the growth fitness associated with the homeostatic transcriptome architecture as if the evolutionary compensation for genome reduction was like all roads leading to Rome.