Abstract

Understanding the relationships between different properties of data, such as whether a genome or connectome has information about disease status, is increasingly important. While existing approaches can test whether two properties are related, they may require unfeasibly large sample sizes and often are not interpretable. Our approach, 'Multiscale Graph Correlation' (MGC), is a dependence test that juxtaposes disparate data science techniques, including k-nearest neighbors, kernel methods, and multiscale analysis. Other methods may require double or triple the number of samples to achieve the same statistical power as MGC in a benchmark suite including high-dimensional and nonlinear relationships, with dimensionality ranging from 1 to 1000. Moreover, MGC uniquely characterizes the latent geometry underlying the relationship, while maintaining computational efficiency. In real data, including brain imaging and cancer genetics, MGC detects the presence of a dependency and provides guidance for the next experiments to conduct.

Data availability

To facilitate reproducibility, we make all datasets available from: https://github.com/neurodata/MGC-paper/tree/master/Data/Preprocessed

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Joshua T Vogelstein

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    jovo@jhu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2487-6237
  2. Eric W Bridgeford

    Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Qing Wang

    Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Carey E Priebe

    Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Mauro Maggioni

    Department of Mathematics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Cencheng Shen

    Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Child Mind Institute Endeavor Scientist Program

  • Joshua T Vogelstein

National Science Foundation

  • Joshua T Vogelstein

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

  • Joshua T Vogelstein

Office of Naval Research

  • Joshua T Vogelstein

Air Force Office of Scientific Research

  • Joshua T Vogelstein

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Vogelstein et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,724
    views
  • 436
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Citations by DOI

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Joshua T Vogelstein
  2. Eric W Bridgeford
  3. Qing Wang
  4. Carey E Priebe
  5. Mauro Maggioni
  6. Cencheng Shen
(2019)
Discovering and deciphering relationships across disparate data modalities
eLife 8:e41690.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41690

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41690