Peer review process

This article was accepted for publication as part of eLife's original publishing model.

Decision letter

  1. Richard Aldrich
    Senior Editor; The University of Texas at Austin, United States
  2. Richard S Lewis
    Reviewing Editor; Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
  3. Robert S Kass
    Reviewer; Columbia University, United States
  4. David Eisner
    Reviewer; U. Manchester, United Kingdom

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your article "A calcium transport mechanism for atrial fibrillation in Tbx5 mutant mice" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Richard Aldrich as the Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Robert S. Kass (Reviewer #1); David Eisner (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission. Our goal is to provide the essential revision requirements as a single set of instructions, so that you have a clear view of the revisions that are necessary for us to publish your work.

Summary:

This is an interesting study of the effects of the T-box transcription factor TBX5 on the susceptibility to atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common and difficult to treat human cardiac arrhythmia. The authors provide convincing evidence that knockout of Tbx5 in adult mice leads to (1) decreased expression of the SR Ca2+ pump SERCA2 and increased expression of phospholamban, leading to a decreased level of SR Ca2+ loading; and (2) increased Na-Ca exchanger (NCX1) expression and activity, providing a mechanism for prolonged action potentials and triggered activity. Additional knockout of phospholamban restored normal SR loading and action potential duration and prevented triggered activity and AF in Tbx5-knockout mice. These results provide a mechanistic link from genetic (GWAS) studies to the cellular mechanisms of AF.

Essential revisions:

The reviewers all found the paper to be interesting and important, but raised a number of concerns that must be adequately addressed before it can be accepted. Some of the required revisions will require further experimentation within the framework of the presented studies and techniques.

1) In Figure 2, the AP is lengthened in the Tbx5 KO cells, and the effect of nifedipine to shorten the AP is greatly increased. The authors interpret this as an effect of prolonged and increased NCX current, but a change in Cav1.2 activity may also contribute. Cav1.2 channels could be more active in the KO cells if there is less Ca2+-dependent inactivation due to less CICR (from the reduced SR Ca content). This could contribute to the prolonged APD and to a more pronounced effect of nifedipine in blocking these channels. To address this point, the authors should conduct voltage clamp recordings of the Cav1.2 current to monitor the degree of inactivation in WT vs. KO, with and without nifedipine. Simultaneous measurement of [Ca2+]i would help establish a basis for these effects.

2) The authors suggest that a larger NCX current occurs in the Tbx5 KO cells because of an increased NCX and decreased SERCA, but this needs some qualification. In the steady state, the amount of Ca pumped out of the cell must balance influx through L-type channels (assuming negligible PMCA activity). Thus, changes in SERCA and NCX cannot affect the integral of the NCX current. If the long plateau of the action potential in Figure 2B reflects an increase of delayed NCX current (due to prolongation of the Ca2+ transient by decreased SERCA), then this must be associated with a decrease of NCX in the earlier stage of the action potential. Is there any evidence for this? As suggested above (#1), simultaneous recording of the action potential and [Ca2+]i in control and Tbx5 KO cells would help to clarify this point.

3) In Figure 4E, the lack of effect of Tbx5 KO on the amplitude of the twitch Ca2+ transient is interesting given that SR Ca2+ content is decreased. Two potential compensatory mechanisms should be addressed. 1) It may be a consequence of the prolongation of the AP. Stimulation of the cells with constant-duration square voltage clamp pulses while measuring [Ca2+]i (see #1 above) would show whether the Ca transient is now less in Tbx5 than control. 2) It looks as though, as a consequence of the slowing of decay of the Ca2+ transient (Figure 4F), the diastolic [Ca2+]i is elevated. This may reduce cytoplasmic Ca2+ buffering such that a smaller total release of Ca2+ from the SR could result in an unchanged amplitude of the Ca2+ transient. Please comment on this possibility.

4) The statistical analysis may need to be modified. In Figure 1, please state the actual numbers of animals used in each group and for the t test. In Figure 2, 3C, 4E-I, and 5C-F, unless each myocyte comes from a different heart, it is invalid to use the number of cells as the "n" values for the t test (see Lazic, BMC Neurosci 2010;11:5). Either use hierarchical or nested statistical approaches (e.g., Sikkel, Francis and Howard, et al. 2017) or simply average cells from the same heart and reduce n to be the number of hearts.

5) Although PLB mRNA is increased in Tbx5 KO mice, the functional contribution of PLB needs to be addressed by examining the phosphorylation status of PLB16 and PLB17.

6) The role of increased NCX in causing AF in Tbx5-KO mice needs to be tested directly. Can an NCX inhibitor eliminate EADs and DADs in Tbx5-KO myocytes?

7) The atrial phenotype of the Tbx5 KO mouse (reduced RyR expression, increased NCX, reduced SERCA activity and SR Ca2+ load) are typical heart failure phenotypes. This raises the question of whether the observed phenotype indicates the underlying basis of AF, or is secondary to ventricular changes leading to heart failure. This question may be addressed using the mouse model before it has progressed to the heart failure stage.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41814.031

Author response

Essential revisions:

The reviewers all found the paper to be interesting and important, but raised a number of concerns that must be adequately addressed before it can be accepted. Some of the required revisions will require further experimentation within the framework of the presented studies and techniques.

1) In Figure 2, the AP is lengthened in the Tbx5 KO cells, and the effect of nifedipine to shorten the AP is greatly increased. The authors interpret this as an effect of prolonged and increased NCX current, but a change in Cav1.2 activity may also contribute. Cav1.2 channels could be more active in the KO cells if there is less Ca2+-dependent inactivation due to less CICR (from the reduced SR Ca content). This could contribute to the prolonged APD and to a more pronounced effect of nifedipine in blocking these channels. To address this point, the authors should conduct voltage clamp recordings of the Cav1.2 current to monitor the degree of inactivation in WT vs. KO, with and without nifedipine. Simultaneous measurement of [Ca2+]i would help establish a basis for these effects.

We agree with the reviewers that ICaL could contribute to APD prolongation, and that calcium influx and efflux must be balanced. To address this, we have measured ICaL. We find peak ICaL is increased 92 ± 34% in Tbx5fl/fl;R26CreERT2 cardiomyocytes in comparison to the R26CreERT2 control. (new Figure 2E-G). Additionally, 30 μM nifedipine completely blocked ICa,L and eliminated any [Ca2+]i transient in both TBX5 KO and control cardiomyocytes (new Figure 2—figure supplement 1). These data are consistent with a role of ICaL in AP prolongation. Increased ICaL may augment peak [Ca]i in the setting of depressed SR load (Figure 4G) and also approximately balances the increase in NCX mediated calcium efflux (Figure 4I). We have added these observations to the Results and Discussion sections of the text.

2) The authors suggest that a larger NCX current occurs in the Tbx5 KO cells because of an increased NCX and decreased SERCA, but this needs some qualification. In the steady state, the amount of Ca pumped out of the cell must balance influx through L-type channels (assuming negligible PMCA activity). Thus, changes in SERCA and NCX cannot affect the integral of the NCX current. If the long plateau of the action potential in Figure 2B reflects an increase of delayed NCX current (due to prolongation of the Ca2+ transient by decreased SERCA), then this must be associated with a decrease of NCX in the earlier stage of the action potential. Is there any evidence for this? As suggested above (#1), simultaneous recording of the action potential and [Ca2+]i in control and Tbx5 KO cells would help to clarify this point.

The reviewers correctly point out that calcium influx must match calcium efflux in steady state. We have now considered this point in the context of new experiments to determine ICaL. Our new finding that increased NCX current is offset by increased ICaL now can explain steady state [Ca]i balance. We have included these data (Figure 1 and 2) and include corresponding discussions. Nevertheless, the reviewers also point out that a decrease in NCX in the earlier stage of the action potential could also contribute to steady state [Ca]i balance. Indeed, in the setting of AP prolongation, a decreased electrochemical drive for inward INCX could exist in the early part of the AP. Therefore, as suggested by the reviewers, simultaneous AP and [Ca2+]i measurements were performed (new Figure 1C). Peak [Ca]i was not depressed during the AP, consistent with our field stimulation experiments in Figure 4E. Thus, assuming that submembrane calcium in the vicinity of the NCX is also similar, then the electrochemical drive for inward INCX may be decreased in the early part of the AP in Tbx5fl/fl;R26CreERT2 cardiomyocytes relative to R26CreERT2 control. However, in the context of increased ICaL and INCX activity, it is challenging to dissect the individual contributions of calcium-dependent currents at depolarized potentials. In the future we hope to better quantify the influx and efflux pathways for calcium during the AP with Tbx5 deficiency using a combined experimental and computer modeling approach. A discussion of this point has been added to the manuscript.

3) In Figure 4E, the lack of effect of Tbx5 KO on the amplitude of the twitch Ca2+ transient is interesting given that SR Ca2+ content is decreased. Two potential compensatory mechanisms should be addressed. 1) It may be a consequence of the prolongation of the AP. Stimulation of the cells with constant-duration square voltage clamp pulses while measuring [Ca2+]i (see #1 above) would show whether the Ca transient is now less in Tbx5 than control. 2) It looks as though, as a consequence of the slowing of decay of the Ca2+ transient (Figure 4F), the diastolic [Ca2+]i is elevated. This may reduce cytoplasmic Ca2+ buffering such that a smaller total release of Ca2+ from the SR could result in an unchanged amplitude of the Ca2+ transient. Please comment on this possibility.

The new square wave experiment proposed by the reviewers is a very good idea because it allows us to assess the peak [Ca]i without the effect of AP prolongation. The square wave experiments are now shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1. In these experiments Tbx5fl/fl;R26CreERT2 cardiomyocytes have a 23 ± 4% decrease in the calcium transient amplitude compared to controls. Our results suggest that AP duration (possibly coupled with increased ICaL density) can explain the similarities in peak twitch calcium between Tbx5fl/fl;R26CreERT2 and R26CreERT2 cardiomyocytes(Figure 4E). It is also interesting to consider that altered buffering capacity could play a role. However, we did not detect any changes in rate of rise of the first 10 ms of the calcium transient as would be expected if a greater portion of calcium buffer was bound or if total calcium buffering capacity was altered. (R26CreERT2riseslope = 107 ± 11 F/Fo*s; Tbx5fl/fl;R26CreERT2riseslope = 108 ± 18 F/Fo*s, p=0.96). Furthermore, we want to emphasize that Fo was always recorded at rest without pacing, so measurements of SR load would be unaffected by this possibility. This new data has been added to the manuscript.

4) The statistical analysis may need to be modified. In Figure 1, please state the actual numbers of animals used in each group and for the t test. In Figure 2, 3C, 4E-I, and 5C-F, unless each myocyte comes from a different heart, it is invalid to use the number of cells as the "n" values for the t test (see Lazic, BMC Neurosci 2010;11:5). Either use hierarchical or nested statistical approaches (e.g., Sikkel, Francis and Howard, 2017) or simply average cells from the same heart and reduce n to be the number of hearts.

As suggested, we adjusted the statistical analysis using the hierarchical approach described in Sikkel et al [1]. Animal numbers are stated in the text where applicable and all of the figures are corrected to show significance indicators based on the revised analysis.

5) Although PLB mRNA is increased in Tbx5 KO mice, the functional contribution of PLB needs to be addressed by examining the phosphorylation status of PLB16 and PLB17.

We agree that the phosphorylation status of PLN is important. Thus, we performed western blot for PLN-S16 and PLN-T17 in Tbx5fl/fl;R26CreERT2and R26CreERT2 control atria. Phosphorylation of PLN-S16 was significantly increased while that of PLN-T17 was unchanged in Tbx5fl/fl;R26CreERT2compared to R26CreERT2 control (Figure 5a). Increased S16 phosphorylation may be a compensatory mechanism for the decrease in SERCA expression. However, based on measurements of SERCA expression and activity (Figure 4A, H), functional effects of PLN phosphorylation are not sufficient to normalize SERCA activity, but knockout of Pln is sufficient (Figure 5). This data and related discussion have been added to the manuscript.

6) The role of increased NCX in causing AF in Tbx5-KO mice needs to be tested directly. Can an NCX inhibitor eliminate EADs and DADs in Tbx5-KO myocytes?

As suggested by the reviewers, NCX inhibitors could theoretically reduce the frequency of DADs in our model. In our recordings using a new generation NCX inhibitor, ORM-10103, at 5μM, we observed a tendency towards action potential shortening (not significant) but no effect on frequency of triggered activity (EADs and DADs). A representative trace is shown in Author response image 1A. However, very large INCX is still detectable in the presence of 5µM ORM-10103 using a square wave voltage clamp pulse to trigger SR release, as described in point 3 (Author response image 1B). INCX inhibition was statistically insignificant (-4% ± 2%). Higher dosages of ORM-10103 or other NCX inhibitors are known to have off-target effects on Na+, Ca2+ and K+ channels, which would complicate interpretation [2,3], particularly in the setting of only partial NCX inhibition. Thus, it is unfortunately challenging to reach any conclusions from the NCX inhibitor data. As newer agents become available it would be reasonable to test their ability to inhibit triggered activity and AF in this model, and we address this in the Discussion.

Author response image 1>

Author response image 1
ORM-10103 does not reduce the frequency of DADs.

(A) Simultaneous Em/[Ca]i recordings demonstrate prolonged APs and presence of DADs (one highlighted in inset). (B) Tail currents recorded after 40 ms square wave voltage clamp pulses reveal uninhibited INCX.

7) The atrial phenotype of the Tbx5 KO mouse (reduced RyR expression, increased NCX, reduced SERCA activity and SR Ca2+ load) are typical heart failure phenotypes. This raises the question of whether the observed phenotype indicates the underlying basis of AF, or is secondary to ventricular changes leading to heart failure. This question may be addressed using the mouse model before it has progressed to the heart failure stage.

It is true that heart failure could complicate our interpretations. However, all experiments were performed at 2 weeks following tamoxifen injection. At this time point, the mice do not have any changes in ejection fraction, which begins after 3 weeks post-tamoxifen treatment [4].

References:

1) Sikkel MB, Francis DP, Howard J, et al. Hierarchical statistical techniques are necessary to draw reliable conclusions from analysis of isolated cardiomyocyte studies. Cardiovascular research. Dec 1 2017;113(14):1743-1752.

2) Jost N, Nagy N, Corici C, et al. ORM-10103, a novel specific inhibitor of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, decreases early and delayed afterdepolarizations in the canine heart. British journal of pharmacology. Oct 2013;170(4):768-778.

3) Amran MS, Homma N, Hashimoto K. Pharmacology of KB-R7943: a Na+-Ca2+ exchange inhibitor. Cardiovascular drug reviews. Winter 2003;21(4):255-276.

4) Nadadur RD, Broman MT, Boukens B, et al. Pitx2 modulates a Tbx5-dependent gene regulatory network to maintain atrial rhythm. Science translational medicine. Aug 31 2016;8(354):354ra115.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41814.032

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Wenli Dai
  2. Brigitte Laforest
  3. Leonid Tyan
  4. Kaitlyn M Shen
  5. Rangarajan D Nadadur
  6. Francisco J Alvarado
  7. Stefan R Mazurek
  8. Sonja Lazarevic
  9. Margaret Gadek
  10. Yitang Wang
  11. Ye Li
  12. Hector H Valdivia
  13. Le Shen
  14. Michael T Broman
  15. Ivan P Moskowitz
  16. Christopher R Weber
(2019)
A calcium transport mechanism for atrial fibrillation in Tbx5-mutant mice
eLife 8:e41814.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41814

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41814