GREB1 amplifies androgen receptor output in human prostate cancer and contributes to antiandrogen resistance
Abstract
Genomic amplification of the androgen receptor (AR) is an established mechanism of antiandrogen resistance in prostate cancer. Here we show that the magnitude of AR signaling output, independent of AR genomic alteration or expression level, also contributes to antiandrogen resistance, through upregulation of the coactivator GREB1. We demonstrate 100-fold heterogeneity in AR output within human prostate cancer cell lines and show that cells with high AR output have reduced sensitivity to enzalutamide. Through transcriptomic and shRNA knockdown studies, together with analysis of clinical datasets, we identify GREB1 as a gene responsible for high AR output. We show that GREB1 is an AR target gene that amplifies AR output by enhancing AR DNA binding and promoting EP300 recruitment. GREB1 knockdown in high AR output cells restores enzalutamide sensitivity in vivo. Thus, GREB1 is a candidate driver of enzalutamide resistance through a novel feed forward mechanism.
Data availability
RNA-seq data has been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE120720. ChIP-seq data has been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE120680
-
GREB1 amplifies androgen receptor output in prostate cancer and contributes to antiandrogen resistanceNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE120720.
-
GREB1 amplifies androgen receptor output in prostate cancer and contributes to antiandrogen resistanceNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE120680.
-
Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancerNCBI dbGap, phs000915.v1.p1.
-
The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate CancercBioPortal for Cancer Genomics.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Charles L Sawyers
National Institutes of Health (CA008748)
- Charles L Sawyers
National Institutes of Health (CA155169)
- Charles L Sawyers
U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-15-1-0540)
- Eugine Lee
Starr Cancer Consortium (I10-0062)
- Charles L Sawyers
Iris & Junming Le Foundation
- Eugine Lee
National Institutes of Health (CA193837)
- Charles L Sawyers
National Institutes of Health (CA224079)
- Charles L Sawyers
National Institutes of Health (CA092629)
- Charles L Sawyers
National Institutes of Health (CA160001)
- Charles L Sawyers
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Ian Tannock, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#06-07-012) of the Research Animal Resource Center of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Version history
- Received: September 11, 2018
- Accepted: December 27, 2018
- Accepted Manuscript published: January 15, 2019 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: January 17, 2019 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2019, Lee et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,554
- views
-
- 390
- downloads
-
- 18
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
In several large-scale replication projects, statistically non-significant results in both the original and the replication study have been interpreted as a ‘replication success.’ Here, we discuss the logical problems with this approach: Non-significance in both studies does not ensure that the studies provide evidence for the absence of an effect and ‘replication success’ can virtually always be achieved if the sample sizes are small enough. In addition, the relevant error rates are not controlled. We show how methods, such as equivalence testing and Bayes factors, can be used to adequately quantify the evidence for the absence of an effect and how they can be applied in the replication setting. Using data from the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, the Experimental Philosophy Replicability Project, and the Reproducibility Project: Psychology we illustrate that many original and replication studies with ‘null results’ are in fact inconclusive. We conclude that it is important to also replicate studies with statistically non-significant results, but that they should be designed, analyzed, and interpreted appropriately.
-
- Cancer Biology
- Cell Biology
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis, with high rates of metastasis and few treatment options. Hyperactivation of KRAS in almost all tumours drives RAC1 activation, conferring enhanced migratory and proliferative capacity as well as macropinocytosis. Macropinocytosis is well understood as a nutrient scavenging mechanism, but little is known about its functions in trafficking of signaling receptors. We find that CYRI-B is highly expressed in pancreatic tumours in a mouse model of KRAS and p53-driven pancreatic cancer. Deletion of Cyrib (the gene encoding CYRI-B protein) accelerates tumourigenesis, leading to enhanced ERK and JNK-induced proliferation in precancerous lesions, indicating a potential role as a buffer of RAC1 hyperactivation in early stages. However, as disease progresses, loss of CYRI-B inhibits metastasis. CYRI-B depleted tumour cells show reduced chemotactic responses to lysophosphatidic acid, a major driver of tumour spread, due to impaired macropinocytic uptake of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor-1. Overall, we implicate CYRI-B as a mediator of growth and signaling in pancreatic cancer, providing new insights into pathways controlling metastasis.