Surface color and predictability determine contextual modulation of V1 firing and gamma oscillations

  1. Alina Peter
  2. Cem Uran
  3. Johanna Klon-Lipok
  4. Rasmus Roese
  5. Sylvia van Stijn
  6. William Barnes
  7. Jarrod R Dowdall
  8. Wolf Singer
  9. Pascal Fries
  10. Martin Vinck  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Germany

Abstract

The integration of direct bottom-up inputs with contextual information is a core feature of neocortical circuits. In area V1, neurons may reduce their firing rates when their receptive field input can be predicted by spatial context. Gamma-synchronized (30-80Hz) firing may provide a complementary signal to rates, reflecting stronger synchronization between neuronal populations receiving mutually predictable inputs. We show that large uniform surfaces, which have high spatial predictability, strongly suppressed firing yet induced prominent gamma-synchronization in macaque V1, particularly when they were colored. Yet, chromatic mismatches between center and surround, breaking predictability, strongly reduced gamma-synchronization while increasing firing rates. Differences between responses to different colors, including strong gamma-responses to red, arose from stimulus adaptation to a full-screen background, suggesting prominent differences in adaptation between M- and L-cone signaling pathways. Thus, synchrony signaled whether RF inputs were predicted from spatial context, while firing rates increased when stimuli were unpredicted from context.

Data availability

As described in the Methods section, several datasets were acquired in this study. Datasets have been uploaded onto Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4809qj4). Thse include individual sessions with each session preprocessed (downsampled, see Methods), epoched into trials with time, channel and condition information.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alina Peter

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8497-6235
  2. Cem Uran

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Johanna Klon-Lipok

    Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Rasmus Roese

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sylvia van Stijn

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. William Barnes

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3833-1214
  7. Jarrod R Dowdall

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Wolf Singer

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Pascal Fries

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Martin Vinck

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
    For correspondence
    martin.vinck@esi-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4044-0970

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP 1665)

  • Pascal Fries

European Commission (FP7-604102-HBP)

  • Pascal Fries

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 1847)

  • Pascal Fries

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FR2557/5-1-CORNET)

  • Pascal Fries

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FR2557/6-1-NeuroTMR)

  • Pascal Fries

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Reinhart Kosselleck grant)

  • Wolf Singer

National Institutes of Health (1U54MH091657-WU-Minn- Consortium-HCP)

  • Pascal Fries

European Science Foundation (European Young Investigator Award)

  • Pascal Fries

LOEWE (NeFF)

  • Pascal Fries

European Commission (HEALTH-F2-2008-200728-BrainSynch)

  • Pascal Fries

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures complied with the German and European regulations for the protection of animals and were approved by the regional authority (Regierungspräsidium Darmstadt, F-149-1000/1005). All surgeries were performed under anesthesia and were followed by analgesic treatment post-operatively.

Copyright

© 2019, Peter et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 453
    downloads

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alina Peter
  2. Cem Uran
  3. Johanna Klon-Lipok
  4. Rasmus Roese
  5. Sylvia van Stijn
  6. William Barnes
  7. Jarrod R Dowdall
  8. Wolf Singer
  9. Pascal Fries
  10. Martin Vinck
(2019)
Surface color and predictability determine contextual modulation of V1 firing and gamma oscillations
eLife 8:e42101.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42101

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42101

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Silas E Busch, Christian Hansel
    Research Article

    Purkinje cell (PC) dendrites are optimized to integrate the vast cerebellar input array and drive the sole cortical output. PCs are classically seen as stereotypical computational units, yet mouse PCs are morphologically diverse and those with multi-branched structure can receive non-canonical climbing fiber (CF) multi-innervation that confers independent compartment-specific signaling. While otherwise uncharacterized, human PCs are universally multi-branched. Do they exceed allometry to achieve enhanced integrative capacities relative to mouse PCs? To answer this, we used several comparative histology techniques in adult human and mouse to analyze cellular morphology, parallel fiber (PF) and CF input arrangement, and regional PC demographics. Human PCs are substantially larger than previously described; they exceed allometric constraint by cortical thickness and are the largest neuron in the brain with 6–7 cm total dendritic length. Unlike mouse, human PC dendrites ramify horizontally to form a multi-compartment motif that we show can receive multiple CFs. Human spines are denser (6.9 vs 4.9 spines/μm), larger (~0.36 vs 0.29 μm), and include an unreported ‘spine cluster’ structure—features that may be congruent with enhanced PF association and amplification as human-specific adaptations. By extrapolation, human PCs may receive 500,000 to 1 million synaptic inputs compared with 30–40,000 in mouse. Collectively, human PC morphology and input arrangement is quantitatively and qualitatively distinct from rodent. Multi-branched PCs are more prevalent in posterior and lateral cerebellum, co-varying with functional boundaries, supporting the hypothesis that this morphological motif permits expanded input multiplexing and may subserve task-dependent needs for input association.

    1. Neuroscience
    Phillip P Witkowski, Lindsay JH Rondot ... Erie Boorman
    Research Article

    Adaptive behavior in complex environments critically relies on the ability to appropriately link specific choices or actions to their outcomes. However, the neural mechanisms that support the ability to credit only those past choices believed to have caused the observed outcomes remain unclear. Here, we leverage multivariate pattern analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and an adaptive learning task to shed light on the underlying neural mechanisms of such specific credit assignment. We find that the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) and hippocampus (HC) code for the causal choice identity when credit needs to be assigned for choices that are separated from outcomes by a long delay, even when this delayed transition is punctuated by interim decisions. Further, we show when interim decisions must be made, learning is additionally supported by lateral frontopolar cortex (lFPC). Our results indicate that lFPC holds previous causal choices in a ‘pending’ state until a relevant outcome is observed, and the fidelity of these representations predicts the fidelity of subsequent causal choice representations in lOFC and HC during credit assignment. Together, these results highlight the importance of the timely reinstatement of specific causes in lOFC and HC in learning choice-outcome relationships when delays and choices intervene, a critical component of real-world learning and decision making.