1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Leave-One-Trial-Out, LOTO, a general approach to link single-trial parameters of cognitive models to neural data

  1. Sebastian Gluth  Is a corresponding author
  2. Nachshon Meiran
  1. University of Basel, Switzerland
  2. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Tools and Resources
  • Cited 5
  • Views 2,080
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e42607 doi: 10.7554/eLife.42607


It has become a key goal of model-based cognitive neuroscience to estimate trial-by-trial fluctuations of cognitive model parameters for linking these fluctuations to brain signals. However, previously developed methods were limited by being difficulty to implement, time-consuming, or model-specific. Here, we propose an easy, efficient and general approach to estimating trial-wise changes in parameters: Leave-One-Trial-Out (LOTO). The rationale behind LOTO is that the difference between parameter estimates for the complete dataset and for the dataset with one omitted trial reflects the parameter value in the omitted trial. We show that LOTO is superior to estimating parameter values from single trials and compare it to previously proposed approaches. Furthermore, the method allows distinguishing true variability in a parameter from noise and from other sources of variability. In our view, the practicability and generality of LOTO will advance research on tracking fluctuations in latent cognitive variables and linking them to neural data.

Data availability

The relevant data and computer codes are uploaded on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/du85f/) and are freely available.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Gluth S
    2. Meiran N
    (2018) Leave-one-trial-out (LOTO)
    Open Science Framework, 10.17605/OSF.IO/DU85F.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sebastian Gluth

    Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2241-5103
  2. Nachshon Meiran

    Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Scheva, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.


Swiss National Science Foundation (100014_172761)

  • Sebastian Gluth

Israel Science Foundation (381-15)

  • Nachshon Meiran

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.


Human subjects: All participants gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Aerztekammer Hamburg, Germany (case # PV4290). All experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Leendert Van Maanen, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

Publication history

  1. Received: October 5, 2018
  2. Accepted: February 7, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 8, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 27, 2019 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: February 28, 2019 (version 3)


© 2019, Gluth & Meiran

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.


  • 2,080
    Page views
  • 322
  • 5

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Lorenz Deserno et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Dopamine is implicated in representing model-free (MF) reward prediction errors a as well as influencing model-based (MB) credit assignment and choice. Putative cooperative interactions between MB and MF systems include a guidance of MF credit assignment by MB inference. Here, we used a double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subjects design to test an hypothesis that enhancing dopamine levels boosts the guidance of MF credit assignment by MB inference. In line with this, we found that levodopa enhanced guidance of MF credit assignment by MB inference, without impacting MF and MB influences directly. This drug effect correlated negatively with a dopamine-dependent change in purely MB credit assignment, possibly reflecting a trade-off between these two MB components of behavioural control. Our findings of a dopamine boost in MB inference guidance of MF learning highlight a novel DA influence on MB-MF cooperative interactions.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Qiuling Li et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Although many genes are known to influence sleep, when and how they impact sleep-regulatory circuits remain ill-defined. Here, we show that insomniac (inc), a conserved adaptor for the autism-associated Cul3 ubiquitin ligase, acts in a restricted period of neuronal development to impact sleep in adult Drosophila. The loss of inc causes structural and functional alterations within the mushroom body (MB), a center for sensory integration, associative learning, and sleep regulation. In inc mutants, MB neurons are produced in excess, develop anatomical defects that impede circuit assembly, and are unable to promote sleep when activated in adulthood. Our findings link neurogenesis and postmitotic development of sleep-regulatory neurons to their adult function and suggest that developmental perturbations of circuits that couple sensory inputs and sleep may underlie sleep dysfunction in neurodevelopmental disorders.