Abstract

To follow the dynamics of meiosis in the model plant Arabidopsis, we have established a live cell imaging setup to observe male meiocytes. Our method is based on the concomitant visualization of microtubules (MTs) and a meiotic cohesin subunit that allows following five cellular parameters: cell shape, MT array, nucleus position, nucleolus position, and chromatin condensation. We find that the states of these parameters are not randomly associated and identify 11 cellular states, referred to as landmarks, which occur much more frequently than closely related ones, indicating that they are convergence points during meiotic progression. As a first application of our system, we revisited a previously identified mutant in the meiotic A-type cyclin TARDY ASYNCHRONOUS MEIOSIS (TAM). Our imaging system enabled us to reveal both qualitatively and quantitatively altered landmarks in tam, foremost the formation of previously not recognized ectopic spindle- or phragmoplast-like structures that arise without attachment to chromosomes.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maria A Prusicki

    Department of Developmental Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3755-3402
  2. Emma M Keizer

    Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Rik Peter van Rosmalen

    Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences; Laboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6911-3298
  4. Shinichiro Komaki

    Department of Developmental Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1189-288X
  5. Felix Seifert

    Department of Developmental Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    Felix Seifert, is affiliated with CropSeq bioinformatics. The author has no other competing interests to declare.
  6. Katja Müller

    Department of Developmental Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Erik Wijnker

    Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Christian Fleck

    Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Arp Schnittger

    Department of Developmental Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    arp.schnittger@uni-hamburg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7067-0091

Funding

European Union (ITN-606956)

  • Maria A Prusicki
  • Erik Wijnker
  • Arp Schnittger

University of Hamburg (Core funding)

  • Maria A Prusicki
  • Shinichiro Komaki
  • Felix Seifert
  • Katja Müller
  • Erik Wijnker
  • Arp Schnittger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Prusicki et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,377
    views
  • 1,108
    downloads
  • 64
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maria A Prusicki
  2. Emma M Keizer
  3. Rik Peter van Rosmalen
  4. Shinichiro Komaki
  5. Felix Seifert
  6. Katja Müller
  7. Erik Wijnker
  8. Christian Fleck
  9. Arp Schnittger
(2019)
Live cell imaging of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana
eLife 8:e42834.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42834

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42834

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.