The COMA complex interacts with Cse4 and positions Sli15/Ipl1 at the budding yeast inner kinetochore

  1. Josef Fischböck-Halwachs
  2. Sylvia Singh
  3. Mia Potocnjak
  4. Götz Hagemann
  5. Victor Solis-Mezarino
  6. Stephan Woike
  7. Medini Ghodgaonkar Steger
  8. Florian Weissmann
  9. Laura D Gallego
  10. Julie Rojas
  11. Jessica Andreani-Feuillet
  12. Alwin Köhler
  13. Franz Herzog  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
  2. Vienna Biocenter, Germany
  3. Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  4. Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Germany
  5. University Paris-Sud, France

Abstract

Kinetochores are macromolecular protein complexes at centromeres that ensure accurate chromosome segregation by attaching chromosomes to spindle microtubules and integrating safeguard mechanisms. The inner kinetochore is assembled on CENP-A nucleosomes and has been implicated in establishing a kinetochore-associated pool of Aurora B kinase, a chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) subunit, which is essential for chromosome biorientation. By performing crosslink-guided in vitro reconstitution of budding yeast kinetochore complexes we showed that the Ame1/Okp1CENP-U/Q heterodimer, which forms the COMA complex with Ctf19/Mcm21CENP-P/O, selectively bound Cse4CENP-A nucleosomes through the Cse4 N-terminus. The Sli15/Ipl1INCENP/Aurora-B core-CPC interacted with COMA in vitro through the Ctf19 C-terminus whose deletion affects accurate chromosome segregation in a Sli15 wild-type background. Tethering Sli15 to Ame1/Okp1 rescued synthetic lethality upon Ctf19 depletion in a Sli15 centromere-targeting deficient mutant. This study shows molecular characteristics of the point-centromere inner kinetochore architecture and suggests a role for the Ctf19 C-terminus in mediating accurate chromosome segregation.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry raw data was uploaded to the PRIDE Archive and is publicly available through the following identifiers: PXD011235 (COMA-Sli15/Ipl1); PXD011236 (CCAN)

The following data sets were generated
    1. Solis V et al
    (2019) AOCM-CPC
    Pride Archive, PXD011235 (COMA-Sli15/Ipl1).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Josef Fischböck-Halwachs

    Gene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sylvia Singh

    Gene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mia Potocnjak

    Gene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Götz Hagemann

    Gene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Victor Solis-Mezarino

    Gene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Stephan Woike

    Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Medini Ghodgaonkar Steger

    Gene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Florian Weissmann

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Laura D Gallego

    Max F Perutz Laboratories, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Julie Rojas

    Laboratory of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jessica Andreani-Feuillet

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, University Paris-Sud, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Alwin Köhler

    Max F Perutz Laboratories, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Franz Herzog

    Gene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    For correspondence
    herzog@genzentrum.lmu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8270-1449

Funding

European Research Council (ERC-StG MolStruKT no 638218)

  • Franz Herzog

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0008/2015)

  • Franz Herzog

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

  • Mia Potocnjak
  • Götz Hagemann
  • Victor Solis-Mezarino
  • Franz Herzog

Bavarian Research Center for Molecular Biosystems

  • Franz Herzog

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Fischböck-Halwachs et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,574
    views
  • 381
    downloads
  • 90
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Josef Fischböck-Halwachs
  2. Sylvia Singh
  3. Mia Potocnjak
  4. Götz Hagemann
  5. Victor Solis-Mezarino
  6. Stephan Woike
  7. Medini Ghodgaonkar Steger
  8. Florian Weissmann
  9. Laura D Gallego
  10. Julie Rojas
  11. Jessica Andreani-Feuillet
  12. Alwin Köhler
  13. Franz Herzog
(2019)
The COMA complex interacts with Cse4 and positions Sli15/Ipl1 at the budding yeast inner kinetochore
eLife 8:e42879.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42879

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42879

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mai Nguyen, Elda Bauda ... Cecile Morlot
    Research Article

    Teichoic acids (TA) are linear phospho-saccharidic polymers and important constituents of the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, either bound to the peptidoglycan as wall teichoic acids (WTA) or to the membrane as lipoteichoic acids (LTA). The composition of TA varies greatly but the presence of both WTA and LTA is highly conserved, hinting at an underlying fundamental function that is distinct from their specific roles in diverse organisms. We report the observation of a periplasmic space in Streptococcus pneumoniae by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The thickness and appearance of this region change upon deletion of genes involved in the attachment of TA, supporting their role in the maintenance of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria as a possible universal function. Consequences of these mutations were further examined by super-resolved microscopy, following metabolic labeling and fluorophore coupling by click chemistry. This novel labeling method also enabled in-gel analysis of cell fractions. With this approach, we were able to titrate the actual amount of TA per cell and to determine the ratio of WTA to LTA. In addition, we followed the change of TA length during growth phases, and discovered that a mutant devoid of LTA accumulates the membrane-bound polymerized TA precursor.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.