Shared behavioral mechanisms underlie C. elegans aggregation and swarming

Abstract

In complex biological systems, simple individual-level behavioral rules can give rise to emergent group-level behavior. While collective behavior has been well studied in cells and larger organisms, the mesoscopic scale is less understood, as it is unclear which sensory inputs and physical processes matter a priori. Here, we investigate collective feeding in the roundworm C. elegans at this intermediate scale, using quantitative phenotyping and agent-based modeling to identify behavioral rules underlying both aggregation and swarming-a dynamic phenotype only observed at longer timescales. Using fluorescence multi-worm tracking, we quantify aggregation in terms of individual dynamics and population-level statistics. Then we use agent-based simulations and approximate Bayesian inference to identify three key behavioral rules for aggregation: cluster-edge reversals, a density-dependent switch between crawling speeds, and taxis towards neighboring worms. Our simulations suggest that swarming is simply driven by local food depletion but otherwise employs the same behavioral mechanisms as the initial aggregation.

Data availability

All data generated and analysed during this study is deposited on the Open Worm Movement Database community page (https://zenodo.org/communities/open-worm-movement-database/). As the full dataset is over 1TB, it is not possible to provide a single DOI for the full dataset. Instead, each recording has a separate DOI, which can be found in Supplementary Table 2. The code for model simulations is available at github.com/ljschumacher/sworm-model.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Siyu Serena Ding

    Institute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8590-3908
  2. Linus J Schumacher

    Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Avelino E Javer

    Institute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Robert G Endres

    Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    r.endres@imperial.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1379-659X
  5. André EX Brown

    Instititue of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    andre.brown@imperial.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1324-8764

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N00065X/1)

  • Robert G Endres
  • André EX Brown

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Ding et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,546
    views
  • 563
    downloads
  • 31
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Siyu Serena Ding
  2. Linus J Schumacher
  3. Avelino E Javer
  4. Robert G Endres
  5. André EX Brown
(2019)
Shared behavioral mechanisms underlie C. elegans aggregation and swarming
eLife 8:e43318.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43318

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43318

Further reading

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Marcelo A Carignano, Martin Kroeger ... Igal Szleifer
    Research Article

    We propose the Self Returning Excluded Volume (SR-EV) model for the structure of chromatin based on stochastic rules and physical interactions. The SR-EV rules of return generate conformationally defined domains observed by single-cell imaging techniques. From nucleosome to chromosome scales, the model captures the overall chromatin organization as a corrugated system, with dense and dilute regions alternating in a manner that resembles the mixing of two disordered bi-continuous phases. This particular organizational topology is a consequence of the multiplicity of interactions and processes occurring in the nuclei, and mimicked by the proposed return rules. Single configuration properties and ensemble averages show a robust agreement between theoretical and experimental results including chromatin volume concentration, contact probability, packing domain identification and size characterization, and packing scaling behavior. Model and experimental results suggest that there is an inherent chromatin organization regardless of the cell character and resistant to an external forcing such as RAD21 degradation.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Yaojun Zhang, Andrew GT Pyo ... Ned S Wingreen
    Research Article

    A hallmark of biomolecular condensates formed via liquid-liquid phase separation is that they dynamically exchange material with their surroundings, and this process can be crucial to condensate function. Intuitively, the rate of exchange can be limited by the flux from the dilute phase or by the mixing speed in the dense phase. Surprisingly, a recent experiment suggests that exchange can also be limited by the dynamics at the droplet interface, implying the existence of an ‘interface resistance’. Here, we first derive an analytical expression for the timescale of condensate material exchange, which clearly conveys the physical factors controlling exchange dynamics. We then utilize sticker-spacer polymer models to show that interface resistance can arise when incident molecules transiently touch the interface without entering the dense phase, i.e., the molecules ‘bounce’ from the interface. Our work provides insight into condensate exchange dynamics, with implications for both natural and synthetic systems.