Identification of EOMES-expressing spermatogonial stem cells and their regulation by PLZF

Peer review process

This article was accepted for publication as part of eLife's original publishing model.

History

  1. Version of Record published
  2. Accepted
  3. Received

Decision letter

  1. Didier Y Stainier
    Senior Editor; Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany
  2. Elizabeth Robertson
    Reviewing Editor; University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  3. Shosei Yoshida
    Reviewer
  4. John Schimenti
    Reviewer; Cornell University, United States

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your article "Identification of slow-cycling germline stem cells and their regulation by PLZF" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Didier Stainier as the Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Shosei Yoshida (Reviewer #1); John Schimenti (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

Summary:

In this report the authors take a careful and unbiased set of approaches to convincingly identify a sub-populaton of GFa1 cells with functional characteristics of SCC that label slowly and express the Tbox transcription factor Eomesodermin. Via scRNA-seq and other labelling experiments the data provided support the growing realization that the spermatagonial As population is heterogeneous in terms of gene expression and also plastic in terms of stemness states. This paper should make a significant contribution to the understanding of spermatagonial stem cells.

Essential revisions:

1) All three reviewers queried whether the data provided convincingly show that the Eomes+ cells do in fact represent slow-cycling cells. In light of the difficulty using existing reagents and experimental approaches to execute a "killer experiment" to definitively show this, the paper should be edited to remove this paragraph and reference to these data from the Abstract and remainder of the text. Leaving out the matter of long/slow cycling SSC does not make the manuscript less interesting.

2) If possible, and assuming the data is in hand, we recommend making a comparison between the expression levels of Eomes in ID4 bright and dim cells. This might hopefully add to the various findings from other groups regarding the identities of SSCs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43352.025

Author response

Essential revisions:

1) All three reviewers queried whether the data provided convincingly show that the Eomes+ cells do in fact represent slow-cycling cells. In light of the difficulty using existing reagents and experimental approaches to execute a "killer experiment" to definitively show this, the paper should be edited to remove this paragraph and reference to these data from the Abstract and remainder of the text. Leaving out the matter of long/slow cycling SSC does not make the manuscript less interesting.

As requested, we have removed the data demonstrating that the EdU-labeling index significantly differs between EOMES+ cells and GFRA1+ cells. We have also removed text suggesting that EOMES+ cells are slow-cycling long-term SSCS. We have retained the data unequivocally demonstrating differential EdU-labeling of EOMES+ cells between Plzf lu/lu and Plzf +/+ mice.

2) If possible, and assuming the data is in hand, we recommend making a comparison between the expression levels of Eomes in ID4 bright and dim cells. This might hopefully add to the various findings from other groups regarding the identities of SSCs.

Helsel et al., 2017, performed RNAseq on ID4 bright and dim cells. In Figure 3 of their paper, they did not report that Eomes was differentially expressed between the two groups. However, in response to the reviewers’ request, we reviewed the Helsel et al. source file (Database S1) and discovered that there is a 4.15 log2 fold (p = 0.00005) enrichment of Eomes in the ID4 bright population, suggesting a strong overlap in EOMES-expressing cells and the ID4 bright population. We have added this new information to the Discussion.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43352.026

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Manju Sharma
  2. Anuj Srivastava
  3. Heather E Fairfield
  4. David Bergstrom
  5. William F Flynn
  6. Robert E Braun
(2019)
Identification of EOMES-expressing spermatogonial stem cells and their regulation by PLZF
eLife 8:e43352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43352

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43352