Plato once wrote that "the knowledge of names is a great part of knowledge" (Silverman, 1992). However, it is seldom that scientists or engineers think about the deeper origins of many of the names and words they use in their professional lives. These specialized vocabularies are introduced during high school and university to describe concepts, phenomena, methodologies and techniques, and we grow so accustomed to them that we lose sight of where they came from (Banay, 1948; Askitopoulou et al., 2000; Ramoutsaki et al., 2002; Danchin, 2010). For example, the word machine derives from the Greek word 'μηχανή', meaning 'trick', which is quite different from its modern usage. The study of the origins of words is called etymology, which, by the way, is derived from the Greek word 'έτυμος' meaning 'real' and 'genuine'.

It is widely accepted that the Greek language has provided more of these names and words than any other language (Flood, 1960; Silverman, 1992; Russo, 2004). As scientists and native speakers, we humbly urge our colleagues to delve a little deeper into the etymology of scientific terms of Greek origin and examine their meaning (Tamis, 2016). Non-Greek speakers will, we are sure, be surprised by the richness and structure of the Greek language, despite its often inept naturalization in English or other languages, and as a result be better able to understand their own areas of science (Snell, 1960; Montgomery, 2004). Our favorite example is the word 'analysis': everyone uses it, but few fully understand it. 'Lysis' means 'breaking up', while 'ana-' means 'from bottom to top' but also 'again/repetitively': the subtle yet ingenious latter meaning of the term implies that if you break up something once, you might not know how it works; however, if you break up something twice, you must have reconstructed it, so you must understand the inner workings of the system.

Many scientific words end with the suffix -ics, such as mathematics, physics and economics. However, these words were initially adjectives, not nouns, so strictly speaking a word like mathematics is incomplete in ancient Greek: the correct term is mathematical philosophy (words that are derived from Greek words meaning 'learnable' and 'love for wisdom' respectively; Nidditch, 1983). We are not arguing here that we need to use any scientific words and terms differently: rather, we are asking readers to be aware of the origins of the words they use and to think about these issues when proposing new scientific terms (Steffanides, 1965; Jarvis, 1996; Lewis, 2004; Welch, 2009).

The PubMed database can be used to get an idea of the prevalence of words of Greek origin in the scientific literature: as of July 28, 2018 PubMed contained records for over 28 million scientific articles. We will focus here on frequently used terms (Newman et al., 2009), but that does not mean that the origins and use of other terms are not important. There are 243 distinct words that each appear in more than one million PubMed records (Supplementary file 1). However, when we exclude articles (such as 'the'), prepositions (such as 'to' and 'in') and short verb forms (such as 'is' and 'was'), we are left with 172 terms (Supplementary file 2), and removing terms with fewer that four characters (such as DNA and other abbreviations), leaves us with 152 terms (Supplementary file 3; Supplementary file 4). It is worth noting that no single gene or protein name appears in more than one million records (Seringhaus et al., 2008). When combined into a disjoint query, using the OR operator, these 152 terms retrieve ~27.8M entries, the majority (~97%) of all PubMed records.

From this initial dataset, we used etymological dictionaries to identify 15 terms with Greek origin: analysis, based, clinical, diagnosis, gene, genes, method, period, plasma, protein, proteins, surgery, system, therapy, type. The alert reader will notice that 13 of these words are nouns (with the two exceptions being the words 'clinical' and 'based'). We then constructed a PubMed search for records that contained at least one of the 15 words and it returned more than 23 million records, which is more than 80% of the entire database! We also constructed a PubMed search for records that contained at least one of the 137 non-Greek million-plus words and excluded all 15 words of Greek origin and it returned just 4.7 million records, confirming the prevalence of words of Greek origin in the scientific literature. It should be noted that these searches might underestimate the prevalence of Greek terms because, for example, some of the 137 words (such as mice) might be remotely connected by etymology to Greek words.

Advances in science mean that there is an ongoing need for new words (also known as neologisms). However, when a scientist attempts to introduce a new name for a new concept or idea, we would like him or her to consider both the origins of the new name as well as how it relates to existing names (Jackson, 1961; Trüper, 1999). In the field of genomics, the word epigenomics is an example of a new term being introduced in a thoughtful and meaningful way. However, there are many examples of researchers introducing new variations on the word genomics that are sub-optimal: Jonathan Eisen of the University of California, Davis has coined the term #badomics to describe such words.

A case in point is the term metagenomics, which is the study of genetic material taken from environmental samples. Here the prefix 'meta-' is used in a way that is not consistent with its Greek origins (meta- meaning beyond). Better names might have been endogenomics for the study of environmental samples taken from inside a host organism, and exogenomics for the study of samples taken from the outside (endo- and exo- meaning 'inside' and 'outside' in Greek, respectively). A similar situation might have occurred when looking for a name to describe the search for life elsewhere in the universe: the term exobiology was gradually replaced by astrobiology (Gargaud et al., 2011) – possibly because it had to rhyme with astronauts!

The suffix -some (from 'soma', meaning 'body' in Greek) has been employed in neologisms across the life sciences in recent decades, with varying degrees of success (Table 1). Likewise, the suffix -ome (from '-oma', meaning an undefined set in Greek) has been much used (think biome and genome) in recent times. To exemplify the linguistic richness of the Greek language, we explored the use of Greek prepositions to convey additional meaning within genomics. Epigenome (Murrell et al., 2005) is an excellent example of a scientific term in which a Greek preposition ('epi'-, meaning 'on top of') is combined with the suffix -genome to make a word that is precise and logically consistent. Other (less well known) examples include antigenome (which is used in immunology; Sette et al., 2016), metagenome (Streit and Schmitz, 2004), progenome (Ferreira et al., 2004), and hypergenome (Sgaramella, 2013). We then went on to create new words of this kind (Table 2) that, we feel, remain true to their etymological roots while, at the same time, being potentially useful to the scientific community. (The term pangenome (Tettelin et al., 2005), meaning the full complement of genes in a clade, is also very useful although, strictly speaking, 'pan-' is not a preposition).

It is often forgotten that some of humankind's greatest achievements in science, engineering, literature, philosophy, arts and architecture were communicated in Greek, not only in the ancient world but also more recently: the Greek language greatly contributed to the development of the Renaissance, to the French and American Revolutions, and to modern science. Scholars who spoke and wrote in Greek include Newton, Leibniz, Goethe and Wittgenstein, and Greek lives on (alongside Latin) in the taxonomic names devised by Linnaeus, Darwin and others. Perhaps we can still learn something from them, and from scholars in other fields, empowered by the availability of automated translation, online dictionaries and etymology tools. We hope that this contribution will encourage scientists to think about the terminology used in modern science, technology and medicine (Wulff, 2004), and to be more careful when seeking to introduce new words and phrases into our vocabulary.

The supplementary files for this paper and other related information is available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5493133.v2. Etymology of the select terms of Greek origin: http://troodos.biol.ucy.ac.cy/Etymology.html.

1. 1. Askitopoulou H
   2. Ramoutsaki IA
   3. Konsolaki E

   (2000)

   Analgesia and anesthesia: etymology and literary history of related Greek words

   Anesthesia & Analgesia 91:486.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Banay GL

   (1948)

   An introduction to medical terminology I. Greek and Latin derivations

   Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 36:1.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Danchin A

   (2010)

   Les langues de la découverte scientifique

   L'Archicube 9:48.

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Ferreira R
   2. Pontes FJ
   3. de Barros Neto B
   4. Farias PM

   (2004) Do older taxa have older proteins?

   Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 59:454–458.

   https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2004-5-629

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. Book

   1. Flood WE

   (1960)

   Scientific Words: Their Structure and Meaning

   London: Oldbourne.

   • Google Scholar
6. Book

   1. Gargaud M
   2. López-García P
   3. Martin H

   (2011)

   Origins and Evolution of Life: An Astrobiological Perspective

   Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Jackson DM

   (1961)

   Hellenomania-hellenophobia

   Lancet 2:541.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. Website

   1. Jarvis WT

   (1996) Misuse of the term 'allopathy'

   Accessed January 30, 2019.

   https://www.ncahf.org/articles/a-b/allopathy.html
9. 1. Lewis KN

   (2004)

   The language of modern medicine: it's all Greek to me

   The American Surgeon 70:91.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Montgomery S

    (2004) Of towers, walls, and fields: perspectives on language in science

    Science 303:1333–1335.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095204

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Murrell A
    2. Rakyan VK
    3. Beck S

    (2005) From genome to epigenome

    Human Molecular Genetics 14:R3–R10.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. Book

    1. Newman D
    2. Karimi S
    3. Cavedon L

    (2009) Using topic models to interpret MEDLINE's medical subject headings

    In: Nicholson A, Li X, editors. AI 2009: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Melbourne: Springer. pp. 270–279.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10439-8_28

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Nidditch PH

    (1983) The first stage of the idea of mathematics: Pythagoreans, Plato, Aristotle

    Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8:3–34.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1983.tb00458.x

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Ramoutsaki I
    2. Ramoutsakis I
    3. Bouros D

    (2002) Pneumonology or Pneumology?

    Chest 121:1385–1387.

    https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.121.5.1385

    • Google Scholar
15. Book

    1. Russo L

    (2004) The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn

    Berlin: Springer.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18904-3

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Seringhaus MR
    2. Cayting PD
    3. Gerstein MB

    (2008) Uncovering trends in gene naming

    Genome Biology 9:401.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-401

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Sette A
    2. Schenkelberg TR
    3. Koff WC

    (2016) Deciphering the human antigenome

    Expert Review of Vaccines 15:167–171.

    https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.2016.1112743

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Sgaramella V

    (2013) The hypergenome in inheritance and development

    Cytogenetic and Genome Research 139:215.

    https://doi.org/10.1159/000348326

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Silverman A

    (1992)

    Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy

    Plato's Cratylus: The naming of nature and the nature of naming, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Snell B

    (1960)

    The forging of a language for science in ancient Greece

    The Classical Journal 56:50–60.

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Steffanides GF

    (1965) The role of greek and latin in science

    The American Biology Teacher 27:785–789.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/4441190

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Streit WR
    2. Schmitz RA

    (2004) Metagenomics--the key to the uncultured microbes

    Current Opinion in Microbiology 7:492–498.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2004.08.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. Website

    1. Tamis A

    (2016) The importance of learning the Greek language

    Accessed January 30, 2019.

    https://au.greekreporter.com/2016/02/04/the-importance-of-learning-the-greek-language/
24. 1. Tettelin H
    2. Masignani V
    3. Cieslewicz MJ
    4. Donati C
    5. Medini D
    6. Ward NL
    7. Angiuoli SV
    8. Crabtree J
    9. Jones AL
    10. Durkin AS
    11. Deboy RT
    12. Davidsen TM
    13. Mora M
    14. Scarselli M
    15. Margarit y Ros I
    16. Peterson JD
    17. Hauser CR
    18. Sundaram JP
    19. Nelson WC
    20. Madupu R
    21. Brinkac LM
    22. Dodson RJ
    23. Rosovitz MJ
    24. Sullivan SA
    25. Daugherty SC
    26. Haft DH
    27. Selengut J
    28. Gwinn ML
    29. Zhou L
    30. Zafar N
    31. Khouri H
    32. Radune D
    33. Dimitrov G
    34. Watkins K
    35. O'Connor KJ
    36. Smith S
    37. Utterback TR
    38. White O
    39. Rubens CE
    40. Grandi G
    41. Madoff LC
    42. Kasper DL
    43. Telford JL
    44. Wessels MR
    45. Rappuoli R
    46. Fraser CM

    (2005) Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial "pan-genome"

    PNAS 102:13950–13955.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506758102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Trüper HG

    (1999) How to name a prokaryote?

    FEMS Microbiology Reviews 23:231–249.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(99)00005-4

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Welch GR

    (2009) Physiology, physiomics, and biophysics: a matter of words

    Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 100:4–17.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2009.08.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Wulff HR

    (2004) The language of medicine

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 97:187–188.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680409700412

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Ioannis Iliopoulos

   Ioannis Iliopoulos is in the Division of Basic Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   iliopj@med.uoc.gr

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   Additional information

   Corresponding author

2. Sophia Ananiadou

   Sophia Ananiadou is in the School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Antoine Danchin

   Antoine Danchin is in the Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France, and the School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, SAR Hong Kong, China

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6350-5001

4. John PA Ioannidis

   John PA Ioannidis is in the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Peter D Katsikis

   Peter D Katsikis is in the Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Validation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7690-5218

6. Christos A Ouzounis

   Christos A Ouzounis is in the Biological Computation & Process Lab, Chemical Process & Energy Resources Institute, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Thessalonica, Greece.

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   ouzounis@certh.gr

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   Additional information

   Corresponding author

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0086-8657

7. Vasilis J Promponas

   Vasilis J Promponas is in the Bioinformatics Research Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   vprobon@ucy.ac.cy

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   Additional information

   Corresponding author

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3352-4831

• 4,510

  views

• 299

  downloads

• 6

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.