Abstract

A founding paradigm in virology is that the spatial unit of the viral replication cycle is an individual cell. Multipartite viruses have a segmented genome where each segment is encapsidated separately. In this situation the viral genome is not recapitulated in a single virus particle but in the viral population. How multipartite viruses manage to efficiently infect individual cells with all segments, thus with the whole genome information, is a long-standing but perhaps deceptive mystery. By localizing and quantifying the genome segments of a nanovirus in host plant tissues we show that they rarely co-occur within individual cells. We further demonstrate that distinct segments accumulate independently in different cells and that the viral system is functional through complementation across cells. Our observation deviates from the classical conceptual framework in virology and opens an alternative possibility (at least for nanoviruses) where the infection can operate at a level above the individual cell level, defining a viral multicellular way of life.

Data availability

All data are available in the manuscript and in Supplemental Information.Raw data of all quantified green and red fluorescence within individual cells of infected plants are provided as a separate EXCEL supplementary file: Table S4.To allow repeat/reproduce all correlation tests, the 508 raw/unprocessed images (.lsm format) used for preparing all figures and for fluorescence quantification in individual cells have been deposited in the public repository figshare. They can be accessed at the DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5981968

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anne Sicard

    UMR BGPI, INRA, Centre Occitanie Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Elodie Pirolles

    UMR BGPI, INRA, Centre Occitanie Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Romain Gallet

    UMR BGPI, INRA, Centre Occitanie Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marie-Stéphanie Vernerey

    UMR BGPI, INRA, Centre Occitanie Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Michel Yvon

    UMR BGPI, INRA, Centre Occitanie Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Cica Urbino

    UMR BGPI, INRA, Centre Occitanie Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Michel Peterschmitt

    UMR BGPI, INRA, Centre Occitanie Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Serafin Gutierrez

    UMR BGPI, INRA, Centre Occitanie Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Yannis Michalakis

    MIVEGEC (CNRS/IRD/UM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1929-0848
  10. Stéphane Blanc

    UMR BGPI, INRA, Centre Occitanie Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    For correspondence
    stephane.blanc@inra.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3412-0989

Funding

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique

  • Anne Sicard
  • Elodie Pirolles
  • Romain Gallet
  • Marie-Stéphanie Vernerey
  • Michel Yvon
  • Serafin Gutierrez
  • Stéphane Blanc

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Elodie Pirolles
  • Yannis Michalakis

Institut de Recherche pour le developpement

  • Yannis Michalakis

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE02-0014)

  • Anne Sicard
  • Elodie Pirolles
  • Romain Gallet
  • Marie-Stéphanie Vernerey
  • Michel Yvon
  • Yannis Michalakis
  • Stéphane Blanc

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Fernando García-Arenal, Technical University of Madrid, Spain

Version history

  1. Received: November 13, 2018
  2. Accepted: February 26, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 12, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 12, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Sicard et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 18,823
    views
  • 1,513
    downloads
  • 50
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anne Sicard
  2. Elodie Pirolles
  3. Romain Gallet
  4. Marie-Stéphanie Vernerey
  5. Michel Yvon
  6. Cica Urbino
  7. Michel Peterschmitt
  8. Serafin Gutierrez
  9. Yannis Michalakis
  10. Stéphane Blanc
(2019)
A multicellular way of life for a multipartite virus
eLife 8:e43599.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43599

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43599

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Alexander D Cook, Mark Carrington, Matthew K Higgins
    Research Article

    African trypanosomes replicate within infected mammals where they are exposed to the complement system. This system centres around complement C3, which is present in a soluble form in serum but becomes covalently deposited onto the surfaces of pathogens after proteolytic cleavage to C3b. Membrane-associated C3b triggers different complement-mediated effectors which promote pathogen clearance. To counter complement-mediated clearance, African trypanosomes have a cell surface receptor, ISG65, which binds to C3b and which decreases the rate of trypanosome clearance in an infection model. However, the mechanism by which ISG65 reduces C3b function has not been determined. We reveal through cryogenic electron microscopy that ISG65 has two distinct binding sites for C3b, only one of which is available in C3 and C3d. We show that ISG65 does not block the formation of C3b or the function of the C3 convertase which catalyses the surface deposition of C3b. However, we show that ISG65 forms a specific conjugate with C3b, perhaps acting as a decoy. ISG65 also occludes the binding sites for complement receptors 2 and 3, which may disrupt recruitment of immune cells, including B cells, phagocytes, and granulocytes. This suggests that ISG65 protects trypanosomes by combining multiple approaches to dampen the complement cascade.

    1. Medicine
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Yi-Shin Chang, Kai Huang ... David L Perkins
    Research Article

    Background:

    End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients experience immune compromise characterized by complex alterations of both innate and adaptive immunity, and results in higher susceptibility to infection and lower response to vaccination. This immune compromise, coupled with greater risk of exposure to infectious disease at hemodialysis (HD) centers, underscores the need for examination of the immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines.

    Methods:

    The immune response to the COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was assessed in 20 HD patients and cohort-matched controls. RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed longitudinally before and after each vaccination dose for a total of six time points per subject. Anti-spike antibody levels were quantified prior to the first vaccination dose (V1D0) and 7 d after the second dose (V2D7) using anti-spike IgG titers and antibody neutralization assays. Anti-spike IgG titers were additionally quantified 6 mo after initial vaccination. Clinical history and lab values in HD patients were obtained to identify predictors of vaccination response.

    Results:

    Transcriptomic analyses demonstrated differing time courses of immune responses, with prolonged myeloid cell activity in HD at 1 wk after the first vaccination dose. HD also demonstrated decreased metabolic activity and decreased antigen presentation compared to controls after the second vaccination dose. Anti-spike IgG titers and neutralizing function were substantially elevated in both controls and HD at V2D7, with a small but significant reduction in titers in HD groups (p<0.05). Anti-spike IgG remained elevated above baseline at 6 mo in both subject groups. Anti-spike IgG titers at V2D7 were highly predictive of 6-month titer levels. Transcriptomic biomarkers after the second vaccination dose and clinical biomarkers including ferritin levels were found to be predictive of antibody development.

    Conclusions:

    Overall, we demonstrate differing time courses of immune responses to the BTN162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in maintenance HD subjects comparable to healthy controls and identify transcriptomic and clinical predictors of anti-spike IgG titers in HD. Analyzing vaccination as an in vivo perturbation, our results warrant further characterization of the immune dysregulation of ESRD.

    Funding:

    F30HD102093, F30HL151182, T32HL144909, R01HL138628. This research has been funded by the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) award UL1TR002003.