Hierarchical stem cell topography splits growth and homeostatic functions in the fish gill

  1. Julian Stolper
  2. Elizabeth Mayela Ambrosio
  3. Diana-Patricia Danciu
  4. Lorena Buono
  5. David A Elliott
  6. Kiyoshi Naruse
  7. Juan R Martínez-Morales
  8. Anna Marciniak-Czochra
  9. Lazaro Centanin  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, Germany
  2. Heidelberg University, Germany
  3. Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Spain
  4. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Australia
  5. National Institute for Basic Biology, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Japan

Abstract

While lower vertebrates contain adult stem cells (aSCs) that maintain homeostasis and drive un-exhaustive organismal growth, mammalian aSCs display mainly the homeostatic function. Here we use lineage analysis in the fish gill to address aSCs and report separate stem cell populations for homeostasis and growth. These aSCs are fate-restricted during the entire post-embryonic life and even during re-generation paradigms. We use chimeric animals to demonstrate that p53 mediates growth coordination among fate-restricted aSCs, suggesting a hierarchical organisation among lineages in composite organs like the fish gill. Homeostatic and growth aSCs are clonal but differ in their topology; modifications in tissue architecture can convert the homeostatic zone into a growth zone, indicating a leading role for the physical niche defining stem cell output. We hypothesise that physical niches are main players to restrict aSCs to a homeostatic function in animals with fixed adult size.

Data availability

All data analysed for this study is included in the manuscript and supporting files. Raw sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE130939

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Julian Stolper

    Animal Physiology and Development, Centre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Elizabeth Mayela Ambrosio

    Animal Physiology and Development, Centre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7227-7744
  3. Diana-Patricia Danciu

    Institute of Applied Mathematics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8683-3956
  4. Lorena Buono

    Gene Regulation and Morphogenesis, Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David A Elliott

    Cell Biology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1052-7407
  6. Kiyoshi Naruse

    Laboratory of Bioresources, National Institute for Basic Biology, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Juan R Martínez-Morales

    Gene Regulation and Morphogenesis, Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4650-4293
  8. Anna Marciniak-Czochra

    Institute of Applied Mathematics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5831-6505
  9. Lazaro Centanin

    Animal Physiology and Development, Centre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    For correspondence
    lazaro.centanin@cos.uni-heidelberg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3889-4524

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB873/A11)

  • Lazaro Centanin

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB873/B08)

  • Anna Marciniak-Czochra

University of Melbourne (Melbourne Research Fellowship / Graduate Student Fellowship)

  • Julian Stolper

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experimental procedures with fish were performed in accordance with the German animal welfare law and approved by the local government (Tierschutzgesetz {section sign}11, Abs. 1, Nr. 1, husbandry permit number AZ 35-9185.64/BH; line generation permit number AZ 35-9185.81/G-145-15), and with the approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the National Institute for Basic Biology, Japan.

Copyright

© 2019, Stolper et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,891
    views
  • 262
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Julian Stolper
  2. Elizabeth Mayela Ambrosio
  3. Diana-Patricia Danciu
  4. Lorena Buono
  5. David A Elliott
  6. Kiyoshi Naruse
  7. Juan R Martínez-Morales
  8. Anna Marciniak-Czochra
  9. Lazaro Centanin
(2019)
Hierarchical stem cell topography splits growth and homeostatic functions in the fish gill
eLife 8:e43747.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43747

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43747

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Jake Turley, Isaac V Chenchiah ... Helen Weavers
    Tools and Resources

    Cell division is fundamental to all healthy tissue growth, as well as being rate-limiting in the tissue repair response to wounding and during cancer progression. However, the role that cell divisions play in tissue growth is a collective one, requiring the integration of many individual cell division events. It is particularly difficult to accurately detect and quantify multiple features of large numbers of cell divisions (including their spatio-temporal synchronicity and orientation) over extended periods of time. It would thus be advantageous to perform such analyses in an automated fashion, which can naturally be enabled using deep learning. Hence, we develop a pipeline of deep learning models that accurately identify dividing cells in time-lapse movies of epithelial tissues in vivo. Our pipeline also determines their axis of division orientation, as well as their shape changes before and after division. This strategy enables us to analyse the dynamic profile of cell divisions within the Drosophila pupal wing epithelium, both as it undergoes developmental morphogenesis and as it repairs following laser wounding. We show that the division axis is biased according to lines of tissue tension and that wounding triggers a synchronised (but not oriented) burst of cell divisions back from the leading edge.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology
    Leif Benner, Savannah Muron ... Brian Oliver
    Research Article

    Differentiation of female germline stem cells into a mature oocyte includes the expression of RNAs and proteins that drive early embryonic development in Drosophila. We have little insight into what activates the expression of these maternal factors. One candidate is the zinc-finger protein OVO. OVO is required for female germline viability and has been shown to positively regulate its own expression, as well as a downstream target, ovarian tumor, by binding to the transcriptional start site (TSS). To find additional OVO targets in the female germline and further elucidate OVO’s role in oocyte development, we performed ChIP-seq to determine genome-wide OVO occupancy, as well as RNA-seq comparing hypomorphic and wild type rescue ovo alleles. OVO preferentially binds in close proximity to target TSSs genome-wide, is associated with open chromatin, transcriptionally active histone marks, and OVO-dependent expression. Motif enrichment analysis on OVO ChIP peaks identified a 5’-TAACNGT-3’ OVO DNA binding motif spatially enriched near TSSs. However, the OVO DNA binding motif does not exhibit precise motif spacing relative to the TSS characteristic of RNA polymerase II complex binding core promoter elements. Integrated genomics analysis showed that 525 genes that are bound and increase in expression downstream of OVO are known to be essential maternally expressed genes. These include genes involved in anterior/posterior/germ plasm specification (bcd, exu, swa, osk, nos, aub, pgc, gcl), egg activation (png, plu, gnu, wisp, C(3)g, mtrm), translational regulation (cup, orb, bru1, me31B), and vitelline membrane formation (fs(1)N, fs(1)M3, clos). This suggests that OVO is a master transcriptional regulator of oocyte development and is responsible for the expression of structural components of the egg as well as maternally provided RNAs that are required for early embryonic development.