Functional evaluation of transposable elements as enhancers in mouse embryonic and trophoblast stem cells
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are thought to have helped establish gene regulatory networks. Both the embryonic and extraembryonic lineages of the early mouse embryo have seemingly co-opted TEs as enhancers, but there is little evidence that they play significant roles in gene regulation. Here we tested a set of long terminal repeat TE families for roles as enhancers in mouse embryonic and trophoblast stem cells. Epigenomic and transcriptomic data suggested that a large number of TEs helped to establish tissue-specific gene expression programmes. Genetic editing of individual TEs confirmed a subset of these regulatory relationships. However, a wider survey via CRISPR interference of RLTR13D6 elements in embryonic stem cells revealed that only a minority play significant roles in gene regulation. Our results suggest that a subset of TEs are important for gene regulation in early mouse development, and highlight the importance of functional experiments when evaluating gene regulatory roles of TEs.
Data availability
Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE122856.
-
A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genomeNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE49847.
-
Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity GenesNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE44288.
-
EPOP interacts with Elongin BC and USP7 to modulate the chromatin landscapeNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE90045.
-
A draft map of cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genomeNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE29184.
-
Control of Embryonic Stem Cell State by Mediator and CohesinNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE22557.
-
Rodent trophoblast epigenomeNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE42207.
-
Competition between DNA methylation and transcription factors determines binding of NRF1NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE67867.
-
The landscape of accessible chromatin in mammalian pre-implantation embryosNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE66390.
-
Epigenetic restriction of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages mirrors the somatic transition to cancerNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE84236.
-
Allele-specific ATAC-seqNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE71156.
-
Site-specific silencing of regulatory elements as a mechanism of X-inactivationNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE39406.
-
Transcriptional regulation of trophoblast cell fateEBI European Nucleotide Archive, PRJNA298763.
-
The developmental dynamics and disease potential of random monoallelic gene expressionNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE54016.
-
Promoter Capture Hi-C of mouse ESC and TSCEBI ArrayExpress, E-MTAB-6585.
-
Multi-scale 3D genome rewiring during mouse neural developmentNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE96107.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Wellcome (Sir Henry Dale Fellowship 101225/Z/13/Z)
- Miguel R Branco
The Medical College of Saint Bartholomew's Hospital Trust (Donald Hunter Studentship)
- Christopher D Todd
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R505997/1)
- Darren Taylor
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Copyright
© 2019, Todd et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 9,284
- views
-
- 1,289
- downloads
-
- 113
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
- Evolutionary Biology
Gene regulation is essential for life and controlled by regulatory DNA. Mutations can modify the activity of regulatory DNA, and also create new regulatory DNA, a process called regulatory emergence. Non-regulatory and regulatory DNA contain motifs to which transcription factors may bind. In prokaryotes, gene expression requires a stretch of DNA called a promoter, which contains two motifs called –10 and –35 boxes. However, these motifs may occur in both promoters and non-promoter DNA in multiple copies. They have been implicated in some studies to improve promoter activity, and in others to repress it. Here, we ask whether the presence of such motifs in different genetic sequences influences promoter evolution and emergence. To understand whether and how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution, we start from 50 ‘promoter islands’, DNA sequences enriched with –10 and –35 boxes. We mutagenize these starting ‘parent’ sequences, and measure gene expression driven by 240,000 of the resulting mutants. We find that the probability that mutations create an active promoter varies more than 200-fold, and is not correlated with the number of promoter motifs. For parent sequences without promoter activity, mutations created over 1500 new –10 and –35 boxes at unique positions in the library, but only ~0.3% of these resulted in de-novo promoter activity. Only ~13% of all –10 and –35 boxes contribute to de-novo promoter activity. For parent sequences with promoter activity, mutations created new –10 and –35 boxes in 11 specific positions that partially overlap with preexisting ones to modulate expression. We also find that –10 and –35 boxes do not repress promoter activity. Overall, our work demonstrates how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution. It has implications for predicting and understanding regulatory evolution, de novo genes, and phenotypic evolution.
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
- Developmental Biology
The male-specific lethal complex (MSL), which consists of five proteins and two non-coding roX RNAs, is involved in the transcriptional enhancement of X-linked genes to compensate for the sex chromosome monosomy in Drosophila XY males compared with XX females. The MSL1 and MSL2 proteins form the heterotetrameric core of the MSL complex and are critical for the specific recruitment of the complex to the high-affinity ‘entry’ sites (HAS) on the X chromosome. In this study, we demonstrated that the N-terminal region of MSL1 is critical for stability and functions of MSL1. Amino acid deletions and substitutions in the N-terminal region of MSL1 strongly affect both the interaction with roX2 RNA and the MSL complex binding to HAS on the X chromosome. In particular, substitution of the conserved N-terminal amino-acids 3–7 in MSL1 (MSL1GS) affects male viability similar to the inactivation of genes encoding roX RNAs. In addition, MSL1GS binds to promoters such as MSL1WT but does not co-bind with MSL2 and MSL3 to X chromosomal HAS. However, overexpression of MSL2 partially restores the dosage compensation. Thus, the interaction of MSL1 with roX RNA is critical for the efficient assembly of the MSL complex on HAS of the male X chromosome.