1. Cell Biology
  2. Immunology and Inflammation

Autophagy regulates inflammatory programmed cell death via turnover of RHIM-domain proteins

  1. Junghyun Lim
  2. Hyunjoo Park
  3. Jason Heisler
  4. Timurs Maculins
  5. Merone Roose-Girma
  6. Min Xu
  7. Brent Mckenzie
  8. Menno van Lookeren Campagne
  9. Kim Newton
  10. Aditya Murthy  Is a corresponding author
  1. Genentech, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Junghyun Lim
  2. Hyunjoo Park
  3. Jason Heisler
  4. Timurs Maculins
  5. Merone Roose-Girma
  6. Min Xu
  7. Brent Mckenzie
  8. Menno van Lookeren Campagne
  9. Kim Newton
  10. Aditya Murthy
(2019)
Autophagy regulates inflammatory programmed cell death via turnover of RHIM-domain proteins
eLife 8:e44452.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

RIPK1, RIPK3, ZBP1 and TRIF, the four mammalian proteins harboring RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) domains, are key components of inflammatory signaling and programmed cell death. RHIM-domain protein activation is mediated by their oligomerization; however, mechanisms that promote a return to homeostasis remain unknown. Here we show that autophagy is critical for the turnover of all RHIM-domain proteins. Macrophages lacking the autophagy gene Atg16l1accumulated highly insoluble forms of RIPK1, RIPK3, TRIF and ZBP1. Defective autophagy enhanced necroptosis by Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands. TNF-mediated necroptosis was mediated by RIPK1 kinase activity, whereas TLR3- or TLR4-mediated death was dependent on TRIF and RIPK3. Unexpectedly, combined deletion of Atg16l1 and Zbp1 accelerated LPS-mediated necroptosis and sepsis in mice. Thus, ZBP1 drives necroptosis in the absence of the RIPK1-RHIM, but suppresses this process when multiple RHIM-domain containing proteins accumulate. These findings identify autophagy as a central regulator of innate inflammation governed by RHIM-domain proteins.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.001

Introduction

Programmed cell death plays a central role in dictating tolerogenic or immuno-stimulatory responses. To leverage these pathways therapeutically, it is critical to understand how immune-suppressive versus inflammatory modes of cell death (e.g. necroptosis and pyroptosis) are regulated. RHIM-domain containing proteins have emerged as central nodes in inflammatory signaling mediated by cytokines or microbial antigens (also known as microbe-associated molecular patterns/MAMPs) (de Almagro and Vucic, 2015; Kajava et al., 2014; Pasparakis and Vandenabeele, 2015). Receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) kinase activity drives caspase 8-dependent apoptosis as well as pro-inflammatory necroptosis dependent on RIPK3 and its substrate mixed lineage kinase domain like (MLKL) (Cho et al., 2009; He et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2012). Additionally, the cytosolic adaptor Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain-containing adaptor protein inducing interferon−β (TRIF) and innate sensor Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1) can directly interact with RIPK1 and/or RIPK3 via their RHIM domains, thereby stabilizing downstream signaling (He et al., 2011; Kaiser et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2016; Newton et al., 2016; Thapa et al., 2016). While the role of these proteins in inflammation and cell death have been elucidated via genetic deletion, mechanisms which drive a return to homeostasis have remained poorly described (Cuchet-Lourenço et al., 2018; Ito et al., 2016; Mocarski et al., 2014; Ofengeim et al., 2017; Weinlich et al., 2017). RHIM-dependent oligomerization of TRIF, RIPK1, RIPK3 and ZBP1 is required for their function, but this also results in the generation of amyloid-like structures which require regulated turnover to prevent signal amplification (Kaiser et al., 2013; Li et al., 2012; Rebsamen et al., 2009).

Selective autophagy targets the autophagic machinery to specific cargo via autophagy receptors. Forms of selective autophagy have been identified in the turnover of organelles, cytosolic pathogens and protein aggregates, ultimately driving their turnover via lysosomal degradation (Anding and Baehrecke, 2017; Khaminets et al., 2016; Levine et al., 2011; Mizushima, 2007). Putative links between autophagy and TNF-mediated necroptosis of epithelial cells have emerged, but contradictory observations in primary versus transformed cells question how autophagy impacts necroptosis in these models (Goodall et al., 2016; Matsuzawa-Ishimoto et al., 2017). In the current study, we investigated the role of autophagy in innate immunity driven by macrophage activation. We found that autophagy is critical for the turnover of highly insoluble complexes containing TRIF, RIPK1, RIPK3 or ZBP1. Defective autophagy enhanced cytokine production and necroptosis driven by activators of RHIM-domain proteins. Unexpectedly, we observed that ZBP1 dampens necroptosis in a context-specific manner, since deletion of Zbp1 in an autophagy deficient background exacerbated necroptosis driven by TRIF. Thus, we identify autophagy as an upstream regulator of RHIM-domain proteins and reveal a non-canonical, immunosuppressive function of ZBP1 upon defective autophagy.

Results

Defective autophagy enhances RIPK1-dependent and independent forms of macrophage death

We first asked whether TNF or TLR ligands promote cell death in autophagy-deficient macrophages by deleting Atg16l1, a core gene in the autophagy pathway. Stimulation with TNF or TLR ligands does not significantly induce death of wild-type macrophages, with the exception of TLR3 which can drive caspase-8 mediated apoptosis via TRIF (Kaiser et al., 2013; Gentle et al., 2017; Kawasaki and Kawai, 2014). However, combining inflammatory stimuli with caspase-inhibitors are established methods to study inflammatory cell death via necroptosis in vitro and in vivo (de Almagro and Vucic, 2015; Pasparakis and Vandenabeele, 2015; Weinlich et al., 2017). Atg16l1 deficient bone marrow-derived macrophages (Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs) did not exhibit increased sensitivity to TNF alone, but they were more sensitive than wild-type (Atg16l1-WT) BMDMs to necroptotic stimulus of TNF plus pancaspase inhibitor zVAD-fmk (Figure 1A). Blocking the kinase activity of RIPK1 with Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) reduced death in both Atg16l1-WT and Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs (Figure 1A), consistent with active RIPK1 engaging RIPK3 downstream of TNFR1 (Newton et al., 2014). Death induced by TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR7/8 or TLR9 ligands plus zVAD-fmk was also enhanced by Atg16l1 deficiency (Figure 1B; Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). While Nec-1 suppressed necroptosis by TLR2, TLR7/8 and TLR9 ligands in both genotypes, it was less effective at preventing TLR3- or TLR4-mediated death in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs compared with Atg16l1-WT BMDMs (Figure 1B; Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). IL-1β release by Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs was also elevated upon LPS-mediated necroptosis independent of RIPK1 inhibition (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). The modest effect of Nec-1 in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs may stem from it blocking necroptosis due to autocrine TNF production, which was elevated upon Atg16l1 deletion (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C), but not death due to other mechanisms activating RIPK3.

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Defective autophagy enhances RIPK1-dependent and independent necroptosis.

(A, B) Cell death assayed by Propidium Iodide (PI) staining and live-cell imaging for 12–16 hr (n = 5). BMDMs from mice of the indicated genotypes were treated with combinations of TNF/zVAD/Nec-1 (A) or PolyI:C/zVAD/Nec-1 and LPS/zVAD/Nec-1 (B). (C) Immunoblots confirming deletion of autophagy genes in BMDMs of indicated genotypes using RNP electroporation. NTC = non targeting control gRNA. (D, E) Cell death assayed under combinations of PolyI:C/zVAD/Nec-1 (D) or LPS/zVAD/Nec-1 (E) treatment (n = 4). Data in (A, B) are representative of four independent experiments; (C–E) are representative of two independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Bar graphs depict mean.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.002
Figure 1—source data 1

Defective autophagy enhances RIPK1-dependent and independent necroptosis.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.005

Core autophagy genes can contribute to autophagy-independent functions in innate immunity (Codogno et al., 2011; Fletcher et al., 2018; Heckmann et al., 2017). Conclusive proof of autophagy in suppressing necroptosis therefore requires a genetic approach assessing multiple autophagy-related genes. We established a non-viral gene editing protocol in primary murine macrophages by comparing CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP; schematic in Figure 1—figure supplement 2A). Efficient gene knockdown was achieved in monocyte- and bone marrow-derived macrophages (Figure 1—figure supplement 2B, eGFP deletion; Figure 1—figure supplement 2C,D, Ptprc/CD45 deletion). We used this method in wild-type (WT) BMDMs to delete canonical autophagy genes Atg14l, Rb1cc1 (encoding FIP200) and Atg16l1, as well as Rubcn (encoding Rubicon), the principal gene associated with LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) (Heckmann et al., 2017) (Figure 1C). Deletion of Atg14l and Rb1cc1 significantly enhanced PolyI:C/zVAD- or LPS/zVAD-induced necroptosis, whereas Rubcn deletion resulted in cell death levels comparable to Atg16l1-WT controls (Figure 1D,E). As with loss of Atg16l1, Atg14l and Rb1cc1-deficient BMDMs maintained elevated levels of cell death upon Nec-1 treatment (Figure 1D,E). These results demonstrate that canonical autophagy suppresses TLR3/4-induced necroptosis in BMDMs and uncover a RIPK1 kinase-independent mode of cell death by TLR3/4 activation when autophagy is perturbed.

TRIF and RIPK1 drive necroptosis in Atg16l1-deficient macrophages

To characterize mode of cell death in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs, we performed CRISPR-mediated deletion of necroptosis mediators Ripk3 and Mlkl as well as Gsdmd (Gasdermin d), the final executor of pyroptosis (Kayagaki et al., 2015; Sarhan et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2015). Deletion of Ripk3 and Mlkl but not Gsdmd prevented LPS/zVAD- and TNF/zVAD-induced death in both Atg16l1-WT and Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs, confirming that macrophage death was due to necroptosis (Figure 2A,B; Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). Recently, Gsdmd- and caspase-1-independent secondary pyroptosis mediated by Nlrp3 and Pycard (encoding ASC) was described in murine bone-marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) (Schneider et al., 2017). However, neither Nlrp3 nor Pycard knockdown prevented RIPK1 kinase-independent cell death in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B,C). Therefore, secondary pyroptosis does not appear to contribute to the death of Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs treated with LPS/zVAD or PolyI:C/zVAD. As expected, knockdown of Ticam1 (encoding TRIF) in Atg16l1-WT or Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs also decreased necroptosis induced by PolyI:C/zVAD or LPS/zVAD, although additional inhibition of RIPK1 provided a more complete rescue of cell death (Figure 2C–E). TLR3 only signals via TRIF (reviewed in Kawasaki and Kawai, 2014), so the added protection offered by Nec-1 to wild-type cells is consistent with incomplete knockdown of Ticam1 (Figure 2C).

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
RIPK3, MLKL and TRIF are required for RIPK1-independent necroptosis in Atg16l1-deficient BMDMs.

(A-E) Immunoblot (A, C) and cell death assays (B, D, E) of BMDMs from mice of indicated genotypes treated with combinations of LPS/zVAD/Nec-1 following CRISPR-mediated deletion of RIPK3, MLKL or GSDMD (A, B) (n = 4) or TRIF (C–E) (n = 6). Cell death assayed by PI staining and live-cell imaging for 12–16 hr. Data in (A, B) are representative of three independent experiments; (C, D, E) are representative of four independent experiments. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Bar graphs depict mean. NTC = non targeting gRNA.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.008
Figure 2—source data 1

RIPK3, MLKL and TRIF are required for RIPK1-independent necroptosis in Atg16l1-deficient BMDMs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.010

TNF and type I interferons are proposed to license necroptosis in murine macrophages (Sarhan et al., 2019; Siegmund et al., 2016), so we tested whether pharmacological blockade of these cytokines would rescue necroptosis in Atg16l1-deficient BMDMs. Cells were pre-treated for 36 hr with a control antibody (anti-Ragweed), TNFR2-Fc to block TNF, or anti-IFNAR1 to block Interferon-α Receptor 1, and then a necroptosis stimulus was applied. TNFR2-Fc attenuated necroptosis of Atg16l1-WT BMDMs comparably to Nec-1, especially with TLR2 or TLR9 ligands or TNF itself (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A,E,F), but also with TLR3, TLR4 or TLR7 ligands (Figure 2—figure supplement 2B,C,D). In contrast, TNFR2-Fc failed to inhibit necroptosis in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs treated with TLR2, TLR7 or TLR9 ligands (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A,D,E), despite inhibiting necroptosis induced by TLR3 or TLR4 ligands or TNF comparably to Nec-1 (TNFR2-Fc, Figure 2—figure supplement 2B, C, F). Thus, while TNF contributes to enhanced necroptosis of Atg16l1-deficient BMDMs, activation of RIPK1 contributes more to this phenotype, perhaps indicating the involvement of multiple death receptors.

Consistent with the results of McComb et al. (2014), pharmacological blockade of IFNAR1 prevented TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, or TLR9-induced necroptosis in Atg16l1-WT BMDMs (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A,B,C,E). IFNAR1 blockade also decreased TLR3- or TLR4-induced necroptosis of Atg16l1-deficient BMDMs more than Nec-1 (Figure 2—figure supplement 2B,C). However, it only provided modest protection to Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs treated with TLR2, TLR7, or TLR9 ligands or TNF (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A,D,E,F). Accordingly, phosphorylation of STAT1, which is associated with Type I interferon signaling, was increased in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs following LPS/zVAD treatment (Figure 2—figure supplement 2G). These data indicate that signaling by Type I interferons contributes to enhanced necroptosis of Atg16l1-deficient BMDMs, particularly with ligands that activate TRIF.

Loss of autophagy results in accumulation of active forms of TRIF, RIPK1 and RIPK3 during necroptosis

We asked whether loss of Atg16l1 caused TRIF, RIPK1, or RIPK3 to accumulate in necroptotic BMDMs, as this would provide direct biochemical evidence that autophagy promotes their turnover. TRIF appeared to be monomeric in untreated BMDMs of both genotypes, running as a single band in the detergent (NP-40) soluble fraction below the 100-kDa mark in an SDS-PAGE gel (Figure 3A,B). LPS was sufficient to elicit a smear of NP40-insoluble, slower migrating TRIF species that was far more prominent in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs than in Atg16l1-WT BMDMs (Figure 3B). CRISPR-knockdown of Ticam1 (encoding TRIF) in Atg16l1-cKO cells confirmed that the high-MW species were TRIF (Figure 3B, Atg16l1-cKO, Ticam1-gRNA sample). High-MW species of autophosphorylated RIPK1 (p-RIPK1, Ser166/Thr169) as well as total RIPK1 largely accumulated in the NP-40 insoluble fraction after treatment with LPS plus zVAD; these were more abundant in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs than in Atg16l1-WT BMDMs (Figure 3C,D). Slower migrating species of both autophosphorylated RIPK3 (Thr231/Ser232) and total RIPK3 in the insoluble fraction after treatment with LPS plus zVAD were also elevated in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs when compared with Atg16l1-WT BMDMs (Figure 3E,F). Knockdown of Ticam1 decreased the amount of autophosphorylated RIPK3 and autophosphorylated RIPK1 in Atg16l1-cKO cells (Figure 3D,F). Loss of Atg16l1 did not appear to affect the abundance of monomeric TRIF, RIPK1, or RIPK3 in the detergent soluble fraction (Figure 3A,C,E), suggesting that autophagic turnover specifically regulates levels of activated/modified forms of TRIF, RIPK1 and RIPK3. Consistent with reduced autophagic turnover of RHIM proteins enhancing TLR4-induced necroptosis, Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs treated with LPS plus zVAD contained more MLKL phosphorylated at Ser345, a marker of necroptosis (Sun et al., 2012; Cai et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2014; Dondelinger et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014), when compared to their wild-type counterparts (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A).

Figure 3
Download asset Open asset
Loss of Atg16l1 drives accumulation of detergent insoluble, high molecular weight TRIF, RIPK1, RIPK3 and enhances RIPK1/RIPK3 phosphorylation.

(A, B) Immunoblots of TRIF in Atg16l1-WT and Atg16l1-cKO BMDM lysates following 4 hr of treatment with indicated combinations of LPS/zVAD/Nec-1 and enrichment of NP-40 soluble (A) or insoluble (B) fractions. (C, D) immunoblots for autophosphorylated RIPK1 (Ser166/Thr169, p-RIPK1) and total RIPK1 in Atg16l1-WT and Atg16l1-cKO BMDM lysates following 4 hr of treatment with indicated combinations LPS/zVAD/Nec-1 and enrichment of NP-40 soluble (C) or insoluble (D) fractions. (E, F) immunoblot assay for autophosphorylated RIPK3 (Thr231/Ser232, p-RIPK3) and total RIPK3 in Atg16l1-WT and Atg16l1-cKO BMDM lysates following 4 hr of treatment with indicated combinations of LPS/zVAD/Nec-1 and enrichment of NP-40 soluble (E) or insoluble (F) fractions. Representative data shown from three independent experiments. In all immunoblots, CRISPR-mediated TRIF deletion was performed in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs followed by LPS/zVAD treatment as a negative control. *=non specific bands (n.s.).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.014

Measuring the kinetics of cell death revealed that LPS/zVAD-induced necroptosis killed more than 80% of Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs within 3 hr of treatment, compared to approximately 50% of Atg16l1-WT BMDMs (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). Interestingly, Atg16l1-deficient BMDMs were more sensitive than Atg16l1-WT BMDMs to TLR3 engagement alone without zVAD (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C), consistent with TLR3 and TRIF having the capacity to assemble a death-inducing signaling complex that activates caspase-8 (Zinngrebe et al., 2016). We analyzed TRIF, RIPK1 and RIPK3 in the detergent-insoluble fraction in the first 6 hr after treatment with LPS/zVAD, and found that high-MW forms of TRIF accumulated transiently and with similar kinetics in both genotypes, peaking at 1 hr, and to a greater extent in the absence of Atg16l1 (Figure 4B). Accumulation of autophosphorylated, high-MW RIPK1 and RIPK3 peaked at 2 hr after LPS/zVAD treatment in both genotypes, with greater accumulation in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs (Figure 4C,D). Autophosphorylated RIPK1 and RIPK3 were also ubiquitinated with Met1- or Lys63-linked chains, with greater abundance in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs (Figure 4E). Indeed, accumulation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates is a hallmark of defective autophagy (Kwon and Ciechanover, 2017; Dikic, 2017).

Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Overabundance of TRIF, phosphorylated and ubiquitinated RIPK1 and RIPK3 coincides with accelerated necroptosis of Atg16l1 deficient BMDMs.

(A) Kinetic measurement of cell death over 18 hr of LPS/zVAD treatment (n = 5). (B) Immunoblot of TRIF in NP-40 insoluble fractions of BMDM lysates over 6 hr of LPS/zVAD treatment. (C, D) Immunoblots of autophosphorylated and total RIPK1 (C), RIPK3 (D) in NP-40 insoluble fractions of BMDM lysates treated as in (B). (E) Immunoblots of autophosphorylated RIPK1, RIPK3 and ubiquitin in BMDM lysates following immunoprecipitation of M1 or K63-ubiquitinated proteins after 4 hr of LPS/zVAD treatment. Data in (A) are representative of four independent experiments; (B–D) are representative of three independent experiments; (E) are representative of three independent experiments. *=P < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.015
Figure 4—source data 1

Overabundance of TRIF, phosphorylated and ubiquitinated RIPK1 and RIPK3 coincides with accelerated necroptosis of ATG16L deficient BMDMs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.018

To confirm that accumulation of modified forms of TRIF, RIPK1 and RIPK3 occurred due to defective lysosomal turnover via autophagy, pharmacological inhibition of lysosomal function was performed in WT BMDMs during necroptosis. Consistent with our genetic models, treatment of WT BMDMs with Bafilomycin A1, an inhibitor lysosomal vacuolar H-ATPases, resulted in accumulation of high-MW forms of TRIF and RIPK1 in detergent insoluble fractions during LPS/zVAD-mediated necroptosis over 6 hr (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A–C). In contrast, basal turnover of low-MW TRIF, RIPK1, and RIPK3 was not perturbed in a reproducible manner by Bafilomycin A1. For comparison, inhibition of proteasomal degradation with MG-132 caused a very subtle increase in low-MW TRIF and RIPK1, whereas RIPK3 appeared unaffected Figure 4—figure supplement 2D–F). Collectively, these data indicate that lysosomal turnover via autophagy is critical for preventing the accumulation of active TRIF, RIPK1 and RIPK3, and its loss exacerbates necroptotic signaling.

The autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 prevents TRIF-mediated necroptosis

Having demonstrated a role for core autophagy genes in macrophage necroptosis (Figure 1), we analyzed autophagic flux in WT BMDMs during LPS-mediated necroptosis. LC3, a critical component of the mature autophagosome membrane that receives autophagic cargo, is lipidated during the process of autophagy. Additionally, selective autophagy receptors which can potentially associate with cytosolic substrates are trafficked to autophagosomes as a consequence of autophagic flux (Anding and Baehrecke, 2017; Dikic, 2017). Treatment with LPS/zVAD in the presence of Bafilomycin A1 to halt autophagic flux revealed accumulation of lipidated LC3B (LC3-II) in WT BMDMs (Figure 4—figure supplement 2G). Levels of the autophagy receptors SQSTM1/p62, TAX1BP1 and CALCOCO1 were elevated upon Bafilomycin A1 treatment, especially in the detergent-insoluble fraction (Figure 4—figure supplement 2G,H). These data suggest that autophagic flux was ongoing during necroptosis and that autophagy receptors accumulated in the same subcellular compartment as active TRIF, RIPK1 and RIPK3. We and others have observed that the selective autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 suppresses TRIF abundance and TRIF-dependent IFNβ production in BMDMs (Samie et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2017). These findings are consistent with our unbiased proteomics-based identification of SQSTM1/p62, TAX1BP1 and CALCOCO1 as candidate selective autophagy receptors in BMDMs during TLR4 activation (Samie et al., 2018). Immunoblotting revealed accumulation of SQSTM1/p62, TAX1BP1 and CALCOCO1 with varying kinetics after treatment with LPS/zVAD, and loss of Atg16l1 further increased the levels of these receptors in the detergent-insoluble fraction (Figure 5A,B). We utilized CRISPR-mediated knockdown of these autophagy receptors in WT BMDMs to assess their role in necroptosis induced by ligands that engage TRIF (Figure 5C). Loss of Tax1bp1 enhanced BMDM death by either PolyI:C/zVAD or LPS/zVAD treatment. Necroptosis in both settings was only partially blocked by Nec-1. In contrast, knockdown of Sqstm1 or Calcoco1 did not increase TLR3- or TLR4-induced necroptosis in BMDMs (Figure 5D). Thus, the autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 suppresses BMDM necroptosis downstream of TRIF.

Figure 5
Download asset Open asset
The autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 protects against necroptosis by TLR3 or TLR4 ligands.

(A, B) Immunoblots of indicated autophagy receptors in total (A) or NP-40 insoluble fractions (B) of BMDM lysates over 6 hr of LPS/zVAD treatment. (C) Immunoblots confirming CRISPR-mediated deletion of indicated autophagy receptor genes in wild-type BMDMs. (D) Cell death assayed by PI staining and live-cell imaging for 12–16 hr following treatment with indicated ligands. Data in (A, B) are representative of three independent experiment; (C, D) are representative of four independent experiments. **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001. Bar graphs depict mean. NTC = non targeting control gRNA.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.021
Figure 5—source data 1

The autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 protects against necroptosis by TLR3 or TLR4 ligands.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.022

Accumulation of ZBP1 protects against necroptosis in Atg16l1-deficient macrophages

We recently identified the RHIM-domain containing protein ZBP1 as one of the most highly accumulated proteins in Atg16l1-deficient macrophages (Samie et al., 2018). Loss of Atg16l1 resulted in basal accumulation of ZBP1 as shown by a cycloheximide-chase assay (Figure 6A). In contrast to TRIF, RIPK1 and RIPK3, basal turnover of ZBP1 was attenuated by lysosomal inhibition, because treatment with Bafilomycin A1, but not MG132, resulted in ZBP1 accumulation in WT BMDMs (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A). ZBP1 also accumulated during LPS/zVAD-induced necroptosis, and this was enhanced by Atg16l1 deletion (Figure 6—figure supplement 1B). No high-MW forms of ZBP1 were detected using currently available reagents. The role of the Zα1/Zα2- or RHIM-domains of ZBP1 in its accumulation will need to be addressed in future studies.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Elevated ZBP1 in Atg16l1-deficient BMDMs suppresses TRIF-mediated necroptosis.

(A) ZBP1 turnover in Atg16l1-WT and Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs following cycloheximide (CHX) treatment for indicated time points. Representative immunoblot (top), ZBP1 quantification by densitometry (bottom) normalized to ZBP1 band intensity in WT samples at 0 hr. (B, C) immunoblot (B) and cell death (C) assays of BMDMs from mice of indicated genotypes treated with combinations of LPS/zVAD/Nec-1 following CRISPR-mediated deletion of Zbp1, Ticam1 or both (n = 4). (D, E) cell death assayed in Atg16l1-WT or Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs following CRISPR-mediated Zbp1 deletion and a dose titration of LPS in the presence of 20 μM zVAD and/or 30 μM Nec-1 (n = 4). Dot-plots depict mean ±S.D. (F–H) immunoblots depicting accumulation of TRIF (F), autophosphorylated and total RIPK1 (G), autophosphorylated and total RIPK3 (H) in NP-40 insoluble lysates of BMDMs lacking both Atg16l1 and Zbp1 following induction of necroptosis via LPS/zVAD for 3 hr. Top panels represent short exposures; middle panels represent long exposures. *=non specific band. Data (A) are representative of four independent experiments, densitometry is pooled from four independent experiments. Data in (B, C) are representative of three independent experiments; (D–H) are representative of two independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Bar graphs depict mean. NTC = non targeting control gRNA.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.023
Figure 6—source data 1

Elevated ZBP1 in ATG16L1 deficient BMDMs suppresses TRIF-mediated necroptosis.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.025

ZBP1 has been shown to promote cell death upon accumulation of endogenous or viral nucleic acids (Thapa et al., 2016; Kesavardhana et al., 2017; Kuriakose et al., 2016; Maelfait et al., 2017), or genetic deletion of RIPK1-RHIM (Lin et al., 2016; Newton et al., 2016). Thus, we hypothesized that elevated ZBP1 might engage RIPK3 and contribute to enhanced necroptosis in Atg16l1-deficient BMDMs. However, CRISPR-mediated deletion of Zbp1 in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs (Figure 6B) further enhanced LPS/zVAD-induced necroptosis, and this death was prevented by deletion of Ticam1 but not by Nec-1 (Figure 6C; Figure 6—figure supplement 1C). Therefore, contrary to expectations, ZBP1 appears to suppress TRIF-mediated necroptosis (Figure 6C). Notably, loss of Zbp1 did not impact the death of autophagy-sufficient BMDMs, suggesting that levels of ZBP1 must cross a certain threshold before suppressing TRIF-dependent necroptosis. To more thoroughly characterize the sensitization conferred by Zbp1 loss, we measured cell death after performing a dose-titration of LPS in the presence of 20 μM zVAD. CRISPR-mediated deletion of Zbp1 alone did not impact cell death at any dose of LPS (Figure 6D), but combined with defective autophagy, Zbp1 deletion sensitized cells to necroptosis at low doses of LPS, even in the presence of Nec-1 (Figure 6E). Thus, overabundant ZBP1 can antagonize TRIF-mediated necroptosis in Atg16l1-deficient macrophages. We confirmed our CRISPR-based observations by generating conditional-knockout mice lacking Atg16l1 (Atg16l1-cKO; Zbp1-WT) or Atg16l1 and Zbp1 (Atg16l1-cKO; Zbp1-cKO) in myeloid cells. Consistent with our earlier results, Zbp1 deletion accelerated LPS/zVAD-mediated necroptosis of Atg16l1-deficient macrophages (Figure 6—figure supplement 1D). ZBP1 deficiency did not affect the accumulation of TRIF in the detergent insoluble fraction of Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs treated with LPS/zVAD (Figure 6F), arguing that ZBP1 interferes with signaling events further downstream. Indeed, compared to Atg16l1-cKO BMBMs, BMDMs lacking both Atg16l1 and Zbp1 contained more high MW species of autophosphorylated RIPK1 (Figure 6G) and autophosphorylated RIPK3 (Figure 6H) after treatment with LPS/zVAD.

Combined deletion of Atg16l1 and Zbp1 in myeloid cells accelerates LPS-mediated sepsis

Beyond cellular necroptosis, myeloid-specific loss of Atg16l1 sensitizes mice to LPS-mediated sepsis in vivo (Samie et al., 2018). Since Zbp1 deletion enhanced TRIF-mediated necroptosis in Atg16l1-cKO BMDMs ex vivo, we asked whether loss of Atg16l1 and Zbp1 in myeloid cells would further exacerbate LPS-mediated sepsis. Intraperitoneal administration of LPS (10 mg per kg body weight) reproduced the previously observed sensitization of Atg16l1-cKO mice. Combined loss of Atg16l1 and Zbp1 significantly accelerated morbidity, with double-knockout mice succumbing to LPS-driven mortality by 14 hr. Loss of Zbp1 alone did not impact morbidity (Figure 7A; Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). Atg16l1 deficiency in myeloid cells exacerbated LPS-induced IL-1β and TNF in the serum, and the amount of IL-1β was yet higher in Atg16l1-cKO; Zbp1-cKO double-knockout mice (Figure 7B). Together, these results demonstrate that: 1) autophagy regulates ZBP1 abundance in macrophages, 2) elevated ZBP1 suppresses necroptosis when autophagy is perturbed, and 3) loss of both Atg16l1 and Zbp1 in myeloid cells accelerates LPS-mediated inflammation, enhancing morbidity in vivo.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Combined loss of myeloid-specific Atg16l1 and Zbp1 accelerates LPS-mediated sepsis in mice.

(A) Kaplan-Meier survival plots for mice following challenge with 10 mg/kg LPS administered intraperitoneally. Statistical analysis Figure 7—figure supplement 1A was performed using log-rank test (Figure 7—figure supplement 1; Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). (B) Serum cytokine measurements of IL-1β and TNFα performed by ELISA following 4 hr of intraperitoneal LPS administration at 10 mg/kg. Data in A are representative of two independent experiments. Data in B are pooled from two independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.027
Figure 7—source data 1

Accelerated morbidity conferred by double deficiency of ATG16L1 and ZBP1 in myeloid cells following LPS-mediated sepsis in mice.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452.029

Discussion

Macrophages represent primary cellular sensors of the innate immune system. During an inflammatory response, these phagocytes are armed to either propagate or resolve inflammation via antigen uptake and presentation, cytokine production, or induction of programmed cell death. Here, we show that defective autophagy in macrophages leads to an accumulation of modified RIPK1, RIPK3, and TRIF in response to pro-inflammatory signals, precipitating inflammation and necroptosis in a stimulus-dependent manner (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B,C). While RIPK1, RIPK3 and TRIF are well-established signaling factors required for necroptosis, our understanding of ZBP1 in this context is less developed. Recent studies have expanded on cytosolic nucleic-acid sensing by ZBP1 (Thapa et al., 2016; Kesavardhana et al., 2017; Kuriakose et al., 2016; Maelfait et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2018). ZBP1 was also shown to drive RIPK3-mediated necroptosis when the RIPK1-RHIM domain was mutated in vivo (Lin et al., 2016; Newton et al., 2016). However, its role in other forms of innate signaling is not known. Using an optimized protocol for CRISPR-mediated gene editing in primary macrophages, we revealed context-specific roles of TRIF and ZBP1 in regulating necroptosis and inflammatory cytokine production (Figure 7—figure supplement 1C). Specifically, we noted that TRIF can promote RIPK1 kinase-independent, RIPK3-dependent necroptosis when its accumulation is not checked by autophagy. TRIF can engage RIPK3 directly without the need for RIPK1 (Kaiser et al., 2013; Newton et al., 2016), so a scaffolding role for RIPK1 is unlikely. This notion cannot be confirmed genetically because RIPK1-deficiency alone triggers macrophage death (Newton et al., 2016). ZBP1 contains multiple RHIM-domains that support formation of amyloid-like structures (Li et al., 2012; Rebsamen et al., 2009). Accumulation of ZBP1 induced by defective autophagy may perturb optimal TRIF- or RIPK3- signaling via RHIM-mediated interference. Conclusive evidence for this possibility requires the mutation of ZBP1-RHIM domains in autophagy-deficient cells.

In mammalian cells, RHIM-dependent stacking of RIPK1 and RIPK3 has been described as a key feature of the necrosome (Li et al., 2012). RHIM-dependent accumulation of TRIF is also acknowledged as a pre-requisite for TRIF-mediated inflammatory signaling (Gentle et al., 2017). Biophysical characteristics of RHIM-domain protein complexes include a highly insoluble nature and resistance to denaturation/degradation (Fowler et al., 2007; Kleino et al., 2017; Lamour et al., 2017). Ubiquitination of cytosolic proteins is an established mechanism of substrate-identification by selective autophagy, and TRIF, RIPK1 and RIPK3 are ubiquitinated during inflammatory signaling (Yang et al., 2017; Choi et al., 2018; de Almagro et al., 2017). Although ubiquitinated RIPK1, and RIPK3 were more abundant after LPS/zVAD-induced necroptosis when autophagy was compromised, further investigation is needed to define the components of the selective autophagy machinery that drive the turnover of RHIM-domain proteins, and to determine whether ubiquitination is a critical step in this process.

Necroptosis is acknowledged as a potent pro-inflammatory mode of cell death, but there is an incomplete understanding of its role in normal tissue homeostasis and anti-microbial immunity. Genome-wide association (GWA) and functional studies have revealed that defects in autophagy promote inflammatory diseases such as Crohn’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus and neurodegeneration (Levine et al., 2011; Mizushima, 2007; Matsuzawa-Ishimoto et al., 2017; Samie et al., 2018). Our findings provide a potential link between defective autophagy and necroptotic signaling, with autophagy promoting the turnover of RHIM-containing proteins.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type
(species) or
resource		DesignationSource or
reference		IdentifiersAdditional
information
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Atg16l1loxP/loxPPMID: 24553140Dr. Aditya Murthy (Genentech, Inc)
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Zbp1loxP/loxPNewton et al., 2016Dr. Kim Newton (Genentech, Inc)
Commercial assay or kitMouse monocyte isolation kitMiltenyi BiotecCat#: 130-100-629
Peptide, recombinant proteinCas9 V3IDTCat#: 108105810 μg per reaction
Peptide, recombinant proteinmurine TNFαPeprotechCat#: 315-01A50 ng/ml
Peptide, recombinant proteinPam3CSK4InvivogenCat#: tlrl-pms1 μg/ml
Peptide, recombinant proteinPolyI:C (LMW)InvivogenCat#: tlrl-picw10 μg/ml
Peptide, recombinant proteinLPS-EB ultrapure (E. coli O111:B4)InvivogenCat#: tlrl-3pelps100 ng/ml
Peptide, recombinant proteinR848 (Resiquimod)InvivogenCat#: tlrl-r8481 μg/ml
Peptide, recombinant proteinCpG-ODN 1826InvivogenCat#: tlrl-18265 μM
Peptide, recombinant proteinzVAD-fmkPromegaCat#: G723220 μM
Chemical compound, drugNecrostatin-1Enzo Life SciencesCat#: BML-AP309-010030 μM
Chemical compound, drugBafilomycin A1SigmaCat#: B1793100 nM
Chemical compound, drugMG132SigmaCat#: M74492 μM
Peptide, recombinant proteinFcR-BlockBD biosciencesCat#: 5331441
Chemical compound, drugFixable viability dye efluor780InvitrogenCat#: 65–0865
Antibodyanti-CD62L PerCP Cy5.5
Rat monoclonal		BD biosciencesCat#: 560513
RRID: AB_10611578		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-CCR2 APCR and D SystemsCat#: FAB5538A
RRID: AB_10645617		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-F4/80 efluor450
Rat monoclonal		eBioscienceCat#: 48-4801-82
RRID: AB_1548747		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-CSF1R BV711
Rat monoclonal		BiolegendCat#: 135515
RRID: AB_2562679		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-Ly6G BUV395
Rat monoclonal		BD biosciencesCat#: 565964
RRID: AB_2739417		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-CD11b BUV737
Rat monoclonal		BD biosciencesCat#: 564443
RRID: AB_2738811		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-MHCII (IA/IE) PE
Rat monoclonal		eBioscienceCat#: 12-5322-81
RRID: AB_465930		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-Ly6C-PECy7
Rat monoclonal		eBioscienceCat#: 25-5932-82
RRID: AB_2573503		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-CD45 FITC
Rat monoclonal		eBioscienceCat#: 11-0451-82
RRID: AB_465050		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-F4/80 BV421
Rat monoclonal		BiolegendCat#: 123131
RRID: AB_10901171		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-CD11b BUV395
Rat monoclonal		BD biosciencesCat#: 563553
RRID: AB_2738276		Flow cytometry
Antibodyanti-ATG16L1
Mouse monoclonal		MBL internationalCat#: M150-3
RRID: AB_1278758		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-ATG14L
Rabbit polyclonal		MBL internationalCat#: PD026
RRID: AB_1953054		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-FIP200
Rabbit monoclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 12436
RRID: AB_2797913		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-Rubicon
Mouse monoclonal		MBL internationalCat#: M170-3
RRID: AB_10598340		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-TRIF
Host: Rat		Genentech, IncCat#: 1.3.5Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-MLKL
Host: Rabbit		Genentech, IncCat#: 1G12Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-p-MLKL
Rabbit monoclonal		AbcamCat#: ab196436
RRID: AB_2687465		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-RIPK1
Mouse monoclonal		BD biosciencesCat#: 610459
RRID: AB_397832		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-p- RIPK1
Host: Rabbit		Genentech, IncCat#: GNE175.DP.B1Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-RIPK3
Rabbit polyclonal		Novus BiologicalsCat#: NBP1-77299
RRID: AB_11040928		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-p-RIPK3
Host: Rabbit		Genentech, IncCat#: GEN-135-35-9Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-GSDMD
Host: Rat		Genentech, IncCat#: GN20-13Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-LC3B
Rabbit polyclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 2775
RRID: AB_915950		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-CALCOCO1 Rabbit polyclonalProteintechCat#: 19843–1-AP
RRID: AB_10637265		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-TAX1BP1
Rabbit monoclonal		AbcamCat#: ab176572Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-p62
Guinea pig polyclonal		Progen biotechnicCat#: gp62-c
RRID: AB_2687531		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-NLRP3
Rabbit monoclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 15101
RRID: AB_2722591		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-ASC
Rabbit monoclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 67824
RRID: AB_2799736		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-STAT1
Rabbit monoclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 14995
RRID: AB_2716280		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-p- STAT1
Rabbit monoclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 7649
RRID: AB_10950970		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-M1-polyubiquitin linkage specific antibodyGenentech, IncN/AImmunoprecipitation
Antibodyanti-K63-polyubiquitin linkage specific antibodyGenentech, IncN/AImmunoprecipitation
AntibodyAnti-Ubiquitin
Mouse monoclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 3936
RRID: AB_331292		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-beta ActinCell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 3700
RRID: AB_2242334		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-rabbit IgG HRP
Goat polyclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 7074
RRID: AB_2099233		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-mouse IgG HRP
Horse polyclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 7076
RRID: AB_330924		Immunoblot
Antibodyanti-rat IgG HRP
Goat polyclonal		Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 7077
RRID: AB_10694715		Immunoblot
AntibodyAnti-RagweedGenentech, IncN/AInhibition
AntibodyAnti-mIFNAR1
Mouse monoclonal		Leinco TechnologiesCat#: I-401
RRID: AB_2737538		Inhibition
AntibodymTNFR2-Fc
Mouse Fc		Genentech, IncN/AInhibition
Tools (software)Image JImmunoblot densitometry
Tools (software)Graphpad Prism 7GraphpadData visualization and statistics

Mice

Myeloid-specific deletion of Atg16l1 was achieved by crossing Lyz2-Cre + mice with Atg16l1loxP/loxP mice (described in 45). Conditional targeting of the Zbp1 locus was generated in C57BL/6NTac ES cells (Taconic) by introduction of loxP-sites flanking the ATG-containing exon 1, spanning the Zbp1 5’UTR and exon one corresponding to NCBI37/mm9 chr2:173,043,537–173,045,687 (described in 12). A 3xFLAG-tag was inserted in-frame with the ATG. Addition of the 3xFLAG-tag did not compromise ZBP1 function, since it failed to rescue the previously described lethality of Ripk1-RHIM mutant mice (Guo et al., 2018) (Supplementary file 1). Myeloid-specific deletion of Zbp1 was achieved by crossing Lyz2-Cre + mice with Zbp1loxP/loxP mice. Combined deletion of Atg16l1 and Zbp1 was generated by crossing the above two strains of mice. eGFP-reporter mice were obtained from Jackson labs (strain 57BL/6-Tg(CAG-EGFP)1Osb/J, Stock No: 003291). None of the in vivo experiments were randomized. No statistical method was used to pre-determine group sample size, and investigators were not blinded to group allocations or study outcomes.

LPS-driven sepsis

Request a detailed protocol

Intraperitoneal administration of LPS (E. coli O111:B4, Sigma L2630) was performed at 10 mg/kg dissolved in a maximum of 200 μL sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Mice were monitored for morbidity and body temperature every 4 hr for the first 14 hr, followed by monitoring at 24 and 48 hr. Blood was obtained at 4 hr post LPS-administration for serum cytokine analysis. Experiments were performed using age- and sex-matched cohorts from a single colony. All protocols were approved by the Genentech Institutional Animal Care and use Committee; all studies were executed by following relevant ethical regulations detailed in animal use protocols (internal protocol 18–1823).

Cell culture

View detailed protocol

Murine monocytes were obtained from femoral bone marrow by negative selection using a monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). Monocyte-derived macrophages were cultured in macrophage medium [high glucose Dulbecco’s Minimum Essential Media (DMEM) + 10% FBS+GlutaMAX (Gibco) +Pen/Strep (Gibco) supplemented with 50 ng/ml recombinant murine macrophage-colony stimulating factor (rmM-CSF, Genentech)]. Bone marrow-derived macrophages were generated by culture of total femoral bone marrow in macrophage medium on 15-cm non-TC treated plates for 5 days (Petri dish, VWR). Fresh medium was added on day 3 without removal of original media. On day 5, macrophages were gently scraped from dishes, counted and re-plated on TC treated plates of the desired format for downstream assays. After overnight culture in macrophage medium, assays were performed on day 6 BMDMs. CRISPR-edited BMDMs were treated on day 10 to permit complete protein loss of targeted genes. BMDMs were stimulated with 50 ng/ml murine TNFα (Peprotech), 1 μg/ml Pam3CSK4, 10 μg/ml poly(I:C) LMW, 100 ng/ml ultra-pure LPS unless otherwise stated (LPS, E. coli 0111:B4), 1 μg/ml R848 or 5 μM CpG-ODN 1826 (all from Invivogen). zVAD-fmk was added at 20 μM (Promega). Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) was added at 30 μM (Enzo Life Science). DMSO was added at 0.1% as vehicle control (Sigma). For cell death assays, BMDMs were plated at 2 × 104 cells/well in flat-bottom 96-well plates. The following day, cells were stimulated as indicated to induce necroptosis. BMDM viability was assessed by propidium iodide (PI, Invitrogen) staining using live-cell imaging, measuring PI-positive cells per mm2 (Incucyte systems, Essen Biosciences). Percent cell death was calculated by dividing PI-positive cells per mm2 with total plated cells per mm2. Total cell plated cells were enumerated by independently plating BMDMs and staining with a nuclear dye fluorescing in the same channel as PI (Nuclear-ID Red, Enzo Life Science) or addition of 0.1% Triton X-100 in the presence of PI. Time points between 12 and 16 hr were used to compare cell death unless otherwise stated. ZBP1 turnover measured by cycloheximide-chase assays was performed with 100 μg/ml CHX in DMSO for the indicated time points (Sigma). ZBP1 degradation assays in WT BMDMs were performed using 100 nM Bafilomycin A1 (Sigma) or 2 μM MG132 (Sigma) for the indicated time points.

Gene editing

Request a detailed protocol

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of genes was performed by electroporation of Cas9 RNP in monocytes and BMDMs. Briefly, 5 × 106 primary monocytes from the bone marrow or day five cultured BMDMs were electroporated with recombinant Cas9 (IDT) complexed with gene-specific guide RNAs (Supplementary file 2). Briefly, locus-specific crRNAs were annealed with tracrRNAs at a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio at 95°C for 5 min followed by complexing with recombinant Cas9 at a 3 µL:1 µL gRNA:Cas9 ratio per guide RNA to generate the RNP complex. two guide RNAs were combined per gene. Cells were resuspended in 20 µL nucleofector solution P3 and RNP complex added. This mixture was aliquoted into 16-well nucleofector strips (Lonza) and electroporated using program CM-137 (4D-Nucleofector, Lonza). Following electroporation, cells were grown in non-tissue culture treated dishes (VWR) for an additional 5 days in macrophage media. On day 5, cells were scraped from dishes and re-plated as required for functional assays in tissue-culture treated multi-well plates.

Flow cytometry

Request a detailed protocol

Monocyte-derived macrophages or BMDMs were harvested and washed in cold PBS. Cells were incubated in Fc-block reagent (BD biosciences) and fixable viability dye eFluor 780 (Invitrogen) for 15 min at 4°C in cold PBS. Monocyte-derived macrophages were washed once and stained with the following antibodies: anti-CD62L PerCp-Cy5.5 (BD biosciences), anti-CCR2 APC (R and D Systems), anti-F4/80 efluor450 (eBioscience), anti-CSF1R BV711 (Biolegend), anti-Ly6G BUV395 (BD biosciences), anti-CD11b BUV737 (BD biosciences), anti-MHCII(I-A/I-E) PE (eBioscience) and anti-Ly6C PE-Cy7 (eBioscience). BMDMs were washed once and stained with the following antibodies: anti-CD45 FITC (eBioscience), anti-F4/80 BV421 (Biolegend), anti-CD11b BUV395 (BD biosciences). Stained cells were analyzed on by flow cytometry using a BD FACS CANTO instrument. Loss of eGFP or CD45 was assessed by gating on live F4/80 + macrophages using FlowJo X.

ELISA

Request a detailed protocol

BMDM cell culture medium or murine serum was analyzed for measurement of cytokines IL-1β and TNFα (eBioscience) by ELISA following manufacturer’s protocols.

Immunoblotting

Request a detailed protocol

To assay CRISPR-mediated gene deletions, cell pellets were lysed in RIPA buffer +protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche). Supernatants were obtained after high speed centrifugation and protein concentration measured using the BCA assay (Thermo Fisher). To perform detergent soluble and insoluble fractionation, cell pellets were lysed in 1% NP-40 lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA, protease and phosphatase inhibitors). Lysates were flash frozen on dry-ice, thawed on ice and vortexed for 10 s followed by centrifugation at 1000 g for 10 min to remove nuclear pellets. Supernatants were centrifuged at 15000 rpm (or highest speed) for 15 min in a refrigerated table-top centrifuge. Resultant supernatants were collected as NP-40 soluble fractions. NP-40 insoluble pellets were resuspended in 1% NP-40 lysis buffer supplemented with 1% SDS. The suspension was homogenized by passing through a 26-gauge needle, and protein quantification performed using BCA assay. To assess ubiquitination, cells were lysed under denaturing conditions with lysis buffer (9 M urea and 20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0) containing 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM beta-glycerolphosphate and incubated for 20 min with vigorous shaking at 900 rpm at room temperature. Following incubation, cell lysates were centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm. Lysates were then diluted two times with buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0) containing Roche protease inhibitor cocktail, 100 µM PR-619 (SI9619, Life Sensors) and 100 µM 1,10-phenanthroline (SI9649, Life Sensors) and used for immunoprecipitation with ubiquitin chain-specific antibodies and protein-A/G beads overnight at 4°C as previously described in Goncharov et al. (2018). SDS-PAGE was performed using a 4–12% gradient Bis-Tris gel (Novex), followed by protein transfer onto PVDF membranes and antibody incubation. Immunoblots were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (western lightning-plus ECL, Perkin Elmer). Antibodies used: anti-Atg16l1 (MBL international), anti-Atg14l (MBL international), anti-FIP200 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Rubicon (MBL), anti-TRIF (Genentech), anti-MLKL (Genentech), anti-RIPK1 (BD Biosciences), anti-pSer345 MLKL (Abcam), anti-pSer166/Thr169 RIPK1 (Genentech), anti-RIPK3 (Novus Biologicals), anti-pThr231/Ser232 RIPK3 (Genentech), anti-GSDMD (Genentech,), anti-LC3B (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Calcoco1 (Proteintech), anti-Tax1bp1 (Abcam), Sqstm1/p62 (Progen biotechnic), anti-NLRP3 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ASC (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-STAT1 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-pTyr701 STAT1 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-M1 polyubiquitin linkage-specific antibody (Genentech), anti-K63 polyubiquitin linkage-specific antibody (Genentech), anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-rat-HRP Ig (Cell Signaling Technology). ImageJ was used to quantify immunoblot density.

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Pairwise statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired Student’s two-sided t-test to determine if the values in two sets of data differ. Correction for multiple-comparisons was performed using the Holm-Sidak method with α = 0.05. Scatterplot bars and connected dot plots present means of data. Analysis of kinetic (time) or LPS dose-response datasets were performed using two-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison testing. Line graphs and associated data points represent means of data; error bars represent standard deviation from mean. For LPS-mediated sepsis studies, a log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to assess significance of the differences between indicated groups in their survival. GraphPad Prism seven was used for data analysis and representation.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Junghyun Lim

    Department of Cancer Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare

  2. Hyunjoo Park

    Department of Translational Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare

  3. Jason Heisler

    Department of Translational Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare

  4. Timurs Maculins

    Department of Cancer Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Validation, Investigation, Writing—review and editing
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare

  5. Merone Roose-Girma

    Department of Molecular Biology, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare

  6. Min Xu

    Department of Translational Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Resources, Supervision, Methodology, Project administration
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare

  7. Brent Mckenzie

    Department of Translational Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Resources, Supervision, Project administration
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare

  8. Menno van Lookeren Campagne

    Department of Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Supervision, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare

  9. Kim Newton

    Department of Physiological Chemistry, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Resources, Supervision, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare

  10. Aditya Murthy

    Department of Cancer Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing
    For correspondence
    murthy.aditya@gene.com
    Competing interests
    Affiliated with Genentech. No other competing interests to declare
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6130-9568

Funding

Genentech

  • Aditya Murthy

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank K Cherry, T Scholl, B Torres and W Ortiz for animal husbandry, K Wickliffe, K Rajasekaran, K Heger and E Freund for technical assistance, and T Yi, M Albert, S Turley and I Mellman for critical review of this work.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All protocols were approved by the Genentech Institutional Animal Care and use Committee; all studies were executed by following relevant ethical regulations detailed in animal use protocols.(internal protocol 18-1823).

Copyright

© 2019, Lim et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,753
    views
  • 726
    downloads
  • 97
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Citations by DOI

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Junghyun Lim
  2. Hyunjoo Park
  3. Jason Heisler
  4. Timurs Maculins
  5. Merone Roose-Girma
  6. Min Xu
  7. Brent Mckenzie
  8. Menno van Lookeren Campagne
  9. Kim Newton
  10. Aditya Murthy
(2019)
Autophagy regulates inflammatory programmed cell death via turnover of RHIM-domain proteins
eLife 8:e44452.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44452

Categories and tags

Research organism