Aurora A depletion reveals centrosome-independent polarization mechanism in C. elegans

  1. Kerstin Klinkert
  2. Nicolas Levernier
  3. Peter Gross
  4. Christian Gentili
  5. Lukas von Tobel
  6. Marie Pierron
  7. Coralie Busso
  8. Sarah Herrman
  9. Stephan W Grill
  10. Karsten Kruse
  11. Pierre Gönczy  Is a corresponding author
  1. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland
  2. University of Geneva, Switzerland
  3. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

Abstract

How living systems break symmetry in an organized manner is a fundamental question in biology. In wild type Caenorhabditis elegans zygotes, symmetry breaking during anterior-posterior axis specification is guided by centrosomes, resulting in anterior-directed cortical flows and a single posterior PAR-2 domain. We uncover that C. elegans zygotes depleted of the Aurora A kinase AIR-1 or lacking centrosomes entirely usually establish two posterior PAR-2 domains, one at each pole. We demonstrate that AIR-1 prevents symmetry breaking early in the cell cycle, whereas centrosomal AIR-1 instructs polarity initiation thereafter. Using triangular microfabricated chambers, we establish that bipolarity of air-1(RNAi) embryos occurs effectively in a cell-shape and curvature-dependent manner. Furthermore, we develop an integrated physical description of symmetry breaking, wherein local PAR-2-dependent weakening of the actin cortex, together with mutual inhibition of anterior and posterior PAR proteins, provides a mechanism for spontaneous symmetry breaking without centrosomes.

Data availability

All data is available in the manuscript or the supplementary materials.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kerstin Klinkert

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nicolas Levernier

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Peter Gross

    Biotechnology Center (BIOTEC), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Christian Gentili

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lukas von Tobel

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Marie Pierron

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Coralie Busso

    Swiss Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sarah Herrman

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Stephan W Grill

    Biotechnology Center (BIOTEC), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Karsten Kruse

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Pierre Gönczy

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    pierre.gonczy@epfl.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6305-6883

Funding

European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 81-2017)

  • Kerstin Klinkert

European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 1426-2016)

  • Marie Pierron

Fondation Bettencourt Schueller

  • Nicolas Levernier

Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_155942)

  • Pierre Gönczy

Swiss National Science Foundation (205321_175996)

  • Karsten Kruse

H2020 European Research Council (281903)

  • Stephan W Grill

H2020 European Research Council (742712)

  • Stephan W Grill

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Klinkert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,579
    views
  • 549
    downloads
  • 62
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kerstin Klinkert
  2. Nicolas Levernier
  3. Peter Gross
  4. Christian Gentili
  5. Lukas von Tobel
  6. Marie Pierron
  7. Coralie Busso
  8. Sarah Herrman
  9. Stephan W Grill
  10. Karsten Kruse
  11. Pierre Gönczy
(2019)
Aurora A depletion reveals centrosome-independent polarization mechanism in C. elegans
eLife 8:e44552.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44552

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44552

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Yan Song, Linda J Fothergill ... Gene W Yeo
    Research Article

    Dynamic interactions between gut mucosal cells and the external environment are essential to maintain gut homeostasis. Enterochromaffin (EC) cells transduce both chemical and mechanical signals and produce 5-hydroxytryptamine to mediate disparate physiological responses. However, the molecular and cellular basis for functional diversity of ECs remains to be adequately defined. Here, we integrated single-cell transcriptomics with spatial image analysis to identify 14 EC clusters that are topographically organized along the gut. Subtypes predicted to be sensitive to the chemical environment and mechanical forces were identified that express distinct transcription factors and hormones. A Piezo2+ population in the distal colon was endowed with a distinctive neuronal signature. Using a combination of genetic, chemogenetic, and pharmacological approaches, we demonstrated Piezo2+ ECs are required for normal colon motility. Our study constructs a molecular map for ECs and offers a framework for deconvoluting EC cells with pleiotropic functions.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sarah Y Coomson, Salil A Lachke
    Insight

    A study in mice reveals key interactions between proteins involved in fibroblast growth factor signaling and how they contribute to distinct stages of eye lens development.