Aurora A depletion reveals centrosome-independent polarization mechanism in C. elegans

  1. Kerstin Klinkert
  2. Nicolas Levernier
  3. Peter Gross
  4. Christian Gentili
  5. Lukas von Tobel
  6. Marie Pierron
  7. Coralie Busso
  8. Sarah Herrman
  9. Stephan W Grill
  10. Karsten Kruse
  11. Pierre Gönczy  Is a corresponding author
  1. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland
  2. University of Geneva, Switzerland
  3. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

Abstract

How living systems break symmetry in an organized manner is a fundamental question in biology. In wild type Caenorhabditis elegans zygotes, symmetry breaking during anterior-posterior axis specification is guided by centrosomes, resulting in anterior-directed cortical flows and a single posterior PAR-2 domain. We uncover that C. elegans zygotes depleted of the Aurora A kinase AIR-1 or lacking centrosomes entirely usually establish two posterior PAR-2 domains, one at each pole. We demonstrate that AIR-1 prevents symmetry breaking early in the cell cycle, whereas centrosomal AIR-1 instructs polarity initiation thereafter. Using triangular microfabricated chambers, we establish that bipolarity of air-1(RNAi) embryos occurs effectively in a cell-shape and curvature-dependent manner. Furthermore, we develop an integrated physical description of symmetry breaking, wherein local PAR-2-dependent weakening of the actin cortex, together with mutual inhibition of anterior and posterior PAR proteins, provides a mechanism for spontaneous symmetry breaking without centrosomes.

Data availability

All data is available in the manuscript or the supplementary materials.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kerstin Klinkert

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nicolas Levernier

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Peter Gross

    Biotechnology Center (BIOTEC), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Christian Gentili

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lukas von Tobel

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Marie Pierron

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Coralie Busso

    Swiss Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sarah Herrman

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Stephan W Grill

    Biotechnology Center (BIOTEC), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Karsten Kruse

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Pierre Gönczy

    Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    pierre.gonczy@epfl.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6305-6883

Funding

European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 81-2017)

  • Kerstin Klinkert

European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 1426-2016)

  • Marie Pierron

Fondation Bettencourt Schueller

  • Nicolas Levernier

Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_155942)

  • Pierre Gönczy

Swiss National Science Foundation (205321_175996)

  • Karsten Kruse

H2020 European Research Council (281903)

  • Stephan W Grill

H2020 European Research Council (742712)

  • Stephan W Grill

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Klinkert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,595
    views
  • 553
    downloads
  • 66
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kerstin Klinkert
  2. Nicolas Levernier
  3. Peter Gross
  4. Christian Gentili
  5. Lukas von Tobel
  6. Marie Pierron
  7. Coralie Busso
  8. Sarah Herrman
  9. Stephan W Grill
  10. Karsten Kruse
  11. Pierre Gönczy
(2019)
Aurora A depletion reveals centrosome-independent polarization mechanism in C. elegans
eLife 8:e44552.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44552

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44552

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Peipei Xu, Rui Zhang ... Wenxiang Meng
    Research Article

    The reorientation of the Golgi apparatus is crucial for cell migration and is regulated by multipolarity signals. A number of non-centrosomal microtubules anchor at the surface of the Golgi apparatus and play a vital role in the Golgi reorientation, but how the Golgi are regulated by polarity signals remains unclear. Calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated protein 2 (CAMSAP2) is a protein that anchors microtubules to the Golgi, a cellular organelle. Our research indicates that CAMSAP2 is dynamically localized at the Golgi during its reorientation processing. Further research shows that CAMSAP2 is potentially regulated by a polarity signaling molecule called MARK2, which interacts with CAMSAP2. We used mass spectrometry to find that MARK2 phosphorylates CAMSAP2 at serine-835, which affects its interaction with the Golgi-associated protein USO1 but not with CG-NAP or CLASPs. This interaction is critical for anchoring microtubules to the Golgi during cell migration, altering microtubule polarity distribution, and aiding Golgi reorientation. Our study reveals an important signaling pathway in Golgi reorientation during cell migration, which can provide insights for research in cancer cell migration, immune response, and targeted drug development.

    1. Cell Biology
    Sakshi Shambhavi, Sudipta Mondal ... Rajan Sankaranarayanan
    Research Article

    Diacylglycerols (DAGs) are used for metabolic purposes and are tightly regulated secondary lipid messengers in eukaryotes. DAG subspecies with different fatty-acyl chains are proposed to be involved in the activation of distinct PKC isoforms, resulting in diverse physiological outcomes. However, the molecular players and the regulatory origin for fine-tuning the PKC pathway are unknown. Here, we show that Dip2, a conserved DAG regulator across Fungi and Animalia, has emerged as a modulator of PKC signalling in yeast. Dip2 maintains the level of a specific DAG subpopulation, required for the activation of PKC-mediated cell wall integrity pathway. Interestingly, the canonical DAG-metabolism pathways, being promiscuous, are decoupled from PKC signalling. We demonstrate that these DAG subspecies are sourced from a phosphatidylinositol pool generated by the acyl-chain remodelling pathway. Furthermore, we provide insights into the intimate coevolutionary relationship between the regulator (Dip2) and the effector (PKC) of DAG-based signalling. Hence, our study underscores the establishment of Dip2-PKC axis about 1.2 billion years ago in Opisthokonta, which marks the rooting of the first specific DAG-based signalling module of eukaryotes.