Functional and anatomical specificity in a higher olfactory centre

  1. Shahar Frechter  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alexander Shakeel Bates
  3. Sina Tootoonian
  4. Michael-John Dolan
  5. James D Manton
  6. Arian Rokkum Jamasb
  7. Johannes Kohl
  8. Davi Bock
  9. Gregory SXE Jefferis  Is a corresponding author
  1. MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom
  2. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  3. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  4. Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States

Abstract

Most sensory systems are organized into parallel neuronal pathways that process distinct aspects of incoming stimuli. In the insect olfactory system, second order projection neurons target both the mushroom body, required for learning, and the lateral horn (LH), proposed to mediate innate olfactory behavior. Mushroom body neurons form a sparse olfactory population code, which is not stereotyped across animals. In contrast, odor coding in the LH remains poorly understood. We combine genetic driver lines, anatomical and functional criteria to show that the Drosophila LH has ~1400 neurons and >165 cell types. Genetically labeled LHNs have stereotyped odor responses across animals and on average respond to three times more odors than single projection neurons. LHNs are better odor categorizers than projection neurons, likely due to stereotyped pooling of related inputs. Our results reveal some of the principles by which a higher processing area can extract innate behavioral significance from sensory stimuli.

Data availability

Digital skeletons for neuronal morphology and summary electrophysiological data have been provided as supplemental zip files. An interactive version of these data is available as online supplement linked from the paper. Full source data and source code are available on GitHub.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shahar Frechter

    Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    frechter@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0431-5849
  2. Alexander Shakeel Bates

    Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1195-0445
  3. Sina Tootoonian

    Neurophysiology of Behaviour Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michael-John Dolan

    Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9666-3682
  5. James D Manton

    Neurobiology Divison, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9260-3156
  6. Arian Rokkum Jamasb

    Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6727-7579
  7. Johannes Kohl

    Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Davi Bock

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8218-7926
  9. Gregory SXE Jefferis

    Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    jefferis@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0587-9355

Funding

European Commission (ERC CoG 649111)

  • Shahar Frechter
  • Alexander Shakeel Bates
  • Sina Tootoonian
  • Michael-John Dolan
  • James D Manton
  • Gregory SXE Jefferis

Medical Research Council (U105188491)

  • Shahar Frechter
  • Alexander Shakeel Bates
  • Michael-John Dolan
  • James D Manton
  • Johannes Kohl
  • Gregory SXE Jefferis

Wellcome (203261/Z/16/Z)

  • Arian Rokkum Jamasb
  • Davi Bock
  • Gregory SXE Jefferis

European Commission (ERC StG 211089)

  • Shahar Frechter
  • Alexander Shakeel Bates
  • Sina Tootoonian
  • Michael-John Dolan
  • James D Manton
  • Gregory SXE Jefferis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Frechter et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,925
    views
  • 703
    downloads
  • 77
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shahar Frechter
  2. Alexander Shakeel Bates
  3. Sina Tootoonian
  4. Michael-John Dolan
  5. James D Manton
  6. Arian Rokkum Jamasb
  7. Johannes Kohl
  8. Davi Bock
  9. Gregory SXE Jefferis
(2019)
Functional and anatomical specificity in a higher olfactory centre
eLife 8:e44590.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44590

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44590

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Johanna M Kobler, Ilona C Grunwald Kadow
    Insight

    A combination of genetic, anatomical and physiological techniques has revealed that the lateral horn, a region of the brain involved in olfaction in flies, has many more types of neurons than expected.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Luis Sánchez-Guardado, Peyman Callejas Razavi ... Carlos Lois
    Research Article

    The assembly and maintenance of neural circuits is crucial for proper brain function. Although the assembly of brain circuits has been extensively studied, much less is understood about the mechanisms controlling their maintenance as animals mature. In the olfactory system, the axons of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) expressing the same odor receptor converge into discrete synaptic structures of the olfactory bulb (OB) called glomeruli, forming a stereotypic odor map. The OB projection neurons, called mitral and tufted cells (M/Ts), have a single dendrite that branches into a single glomerulus, where they make synapses with OSNs. We used a genetic method to progressively eliminate the vast majority of M/T cells in early postnatal mice, and observed that the assembly of the OB bulb circuits proceeded normally. However, as the animals became adults the apical dendrite of remaining M/Ts grew multiple branches that innervated several glomeruli, and OSNs expressing single odor receptors projected their axons into multiple glomeruli, disrupting the olfactory sensory map. Moreover, ablating the M/Ts in adult animals also resulted in similar structural changes in the projections of remaining M/Ts and axons from OSNs. Interestingly, the ability of these mice to detect odors was relatively preserved despite only having 1–5% of projection neurons transmitting odorant information to the brain, and having highly disrupted circuits in the OB. These results indicate that a reduced number of projection neurons does not affect the normal assembly of the olfactory circuit, but induces structural instability of the olfactory circuitry of adult animals.