Autophagy: COPII vesicles and the expansion of the phagophore
When a cell is starving, it can recycle cytoplasmic elements that are dispensable or faulty to obtain the amino acids and nutrients it needs to survive. This process, known as autophagy, is orchestrated by more than 40 different proteins (Mizushima et al., 2011). It starts with the formation of the phagophore, a flat membrane-bound structure that expands and engulfs the components destined for digestion. Although the membrane of many organelles – including the Golgi apparatus – can be the source of the phagophore, the structure appears to largely emerge from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). It has recently also become clear that the early expansion of the phagophore requires vesicles coated with a protein complex called COPII, hereafter referred to as COPII vesicles (reviewed in van Leeuwen et al., 2018).
Cells with plenty of nutrients grow by producing proteins, and COPII vesicles are essential in this process. They bud from ER exit sites and transport newly synthesized proteins to the Golgi and many other membrane compartments. An array of molecules works together on the membrane at the ER exit sites to form these vesicles. Indeed, the transmembrane ER protein Sec12 and the small GTPase Sar1 help to recruit the Sec23/Sec24 complex that will create the inner coat of the vesicle, while another complex, Sec13/31, will then form the outer coat (Gomez-Navarro and Miller, 2016). However, while starving cells require COPII vesicles for autophagy, cells deprived of nutrients reduce their protein secretion (Jeong et al., 2018; Zacharogianni et al., 2014): in this context, how can these vesicles be specifically generated to help expand the phagophore?
Several complementary models have been put forward to explain how this could be possible. Some propose that once the COPII vesicles have formed at the ER exit sites, they are redirected away from the Golgi and towards the nascent phagophore (Rao et al., 2016; Tan et al., 2013; Davis et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2015). Another model suggests that in starving mammalian cells, instead of being redirected, COPII vesicles bud from a different place altogether. Indeed, during starvation, COPII vesicles emerge from a membrane between the ER and the Golgi, the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC). Autophagy activates an enzyme, the kinase ULK1, which drives this change by helping to relocate the COPII protein Sec12 to the ERGIC (Ge et al., 2017). Once the vesicles have budded from this structure, they go on to expand the phagophore (Ge et al., 2015). Now, in eLife, Michele Pagano and colleagues at New York University School of Medicine, IBioBA in Buenos Aires and other institutes in the United States and Argentina – including Yeon-Tae Jeong as first author – report results that support and expand this last model (Jeong et al., 2018).
Combining state-of-the-art biochemistry with imaging, Jeong et al. show that COPII vesicles do indeed bud from the ERGIC during autophagy. But the experiments also reveal that the inner coat of these vesicles is different. When cells are growing, an enzyme known as FBXW5 tags Sec23B for destruction, and the protein is then degraded slowly, but constantly. Under these conditions, the remaining Sec23B proteins may bind Sec24 and help form COPII vesicles destined for secretion, but this is likely a small contribution.
The study by Jeong et al. further reveals that when starvation activates ULK1, the enzyme then phosphorylates Sec23B to produce Sec23B-P, which is impervious to FBXW5; Sec23B-P starts to accumulate and bind to Sec24A and Sec24B – but not Sec24C or Sec24D. The Sec23B-P/Sec24AB complex then relocates to the ERGIC (possibly as a direct consequence of the phosphorylation of Sec23B), and it forms COPII vesicles specifically destined to fuel the growth of the phagophore. The beauty of these experiments is thus to show that certain COPII subunits have a clear, dedicated role during autophagy, with Sec23B-P/Sec24AB playing a key part in forming the vesicles required in this process (Figure 1). It remains to be examined whether Sec23B-P/Sec24AB also helps transport proteins to the Golgi under starvation conditions, when general secretion is reduced and the complex is efficiently brought to the ERGIC. While it is likely that the complex is specific to autophagy, this would need to be further investigated.
The work by Jeong et al. also helps to better grasp how ULK1 controls the use of COPII proteins during autophagy: the kinase helps to relocate the machinery from ER exit sites to the ERGIC, while also tweaking the nature of the vesicles’ inner coat to fuel the early expansion of the phagophore. These results add to work at Berkeley, which showed how ULK1 participates in bringing Sec12 to the ERGIC, initiating the formation of COPII vesicles (Ge et al., 2015; Ge et al., 2017). In yeast, ULK1 also contributes to the recruitment of a protein that, once activated, will direct COPII vesicles to the phagophore assembly site (Wang et al., 2013). Next, it will be interesting to learn how the enzyme acts on other components of the ER exit sites – including Sec16, a ULK1 substrate during periods of growth (Joo et al., 2016).
References
-
Protein sorting at the ER-Golgi interfaceThe Journal of Cell Biology 215:769–778.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201610031
-
The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formationAnnual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 27:107–132.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154005
-
The Atg1-kinase complex tethers Atg9-vesicles to initiate autophagyNature Communications 7:10338.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10338
-
Modulation of the secretory pathway by amino-acid starvationThe Journal of Cell Biology 217:2261–2271.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201802003
-
Ypt1/Rab1 regulates Hrr25/CK1δ kinase activity in ER-Golgi traffic and macroautophagyThe Journal of Cell Biology 210:273–285.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201408075
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2019, Rabouille
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,159
- views
-
- 265
- downloads
-
- 6
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
Aggregation of mutant forms of Huntingtin is the underlying feature of neurodegeneration observed in Huntington’s disorder. In addition to neurons, cellular processes in non-neuronal cell types are also shown to be affected. Cells expressing neurodegeneration–associated mutant proteins show altered uptake of ligands, suggestive of impaired endocytosis, in a manner as yet unknown. Using live cell imaging, we show that clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is affected in Drosophila hemocytes and mammalian cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. This is also accompanied by alterations in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton resulting in increased cellular stiffness. Further, we find that Huntingtin aggregates sequester actin and actin-modifying proteins. Overexpression of Hip1 or Arp3 (actin-interacting proteins) could restore CME and cellular stiffness in cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. Neurodegeneration driven by pathogenic Huntingtin was also rescued upon overexpression of either Hip1 or Arp3 in Drosophila. Examination of other pathogenic aggregates revealed that TDP-43 also displayed defective CME, altered actin organization and increased stiffness, similar to pathogenic Huntingtin. Together, our results point to an intimate connection between dysfunctional CME, actin misorganization and increased cellular stiffness caused by alteration in the local intracellular environment by pathogenic aggregates.
-
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
How cells regulate the size of their organelles remains a fundamental question in cell biology. Cilia, with their simple structure and surface localization, provide an ideal model for investigating organelle size control. However, most studies on cilia length regulation are primarily performed on several single-celled organisms. In contrast, the mechanism of length regulation in cilia across diverse cell types within multicellular organisms remains a mystery. Similar to humans, zebrafish contain diverse types of cilia with variable lengths. Taking advantage of the transparency of zebrafish embryos, we conducted a comprehensive investigation into intraflagellar transport (IFT), an essential process for ciliogenesis. By generating a transgenic line carrying Ift88-GFP transgene, we observed IFT in multiple types of cilia with varying lengths. Remarkably, cilia exhibited variable IFT speeds in different cell types, with longer cilia exhibiting faster IFT speeds. This increased IFT speed in longer cilia is likely not due to changes in common factors that regulate IFT, such as motor selection, BBSome proteins, or tubulin modification. Interestingly, longer cilia in the ear cristae tend to form larger IFT compared to shorter spinal cord cilia. Reducing the size of IFT particles by knocking down Ift88 slowed IFT speed and resulted in the formation of shorter cilia. Our study proposes an intriguing model of cilia length regulation via controlling IFT speed through the modulation of the size of the IFT complex. This discovery may provide further insights into our understanding of how organelle size is regulated in higher vertebrates.