'Palaeoshellomics' reveals the use of freshwater mother-of-pearl in prehistory

  1. Jorune Sakalauskaite
  2. Søren Andersen
  3. Paolo Biagi
  4. Maria A Borrello
  5. Théophile Cocquerez
  6. André Carlo Colonese
  7. Federica Dal Bello
  8. Alberto Girod
  9. Marion Heumüller
  10. Hannah Koon
  11. Giorgia Mandili
  12. Claudio Medana
  13. Kirsty E H Penkman
  14. Laurent Plasseraud
  15. Helmut Schlichtherle
  16. Sheila Taylor
  17. Caroline Tokarski
  18. Jérôme Thomas
  19. Julie Wilson
  20. Frédéric Marin
  21. Beatrice Demarchi  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Turin, Italy
  2. Moesgaard Museum, Denmark
  3. University of Ca' Foscari, Italy
  4. Independent Researcher, Switzerland
  5. University of Burgundy-Franche-Comté, France
  6. University of York, United Kingdom
  7. Italian Malacological Society, Switzerland
  8. Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Germany
  9. University of Bradford, United Kingdom
  10. Landesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Germany
  11. University of Lille, France

Abstract

The extensive use of mollusc shell as a versatile raw material is testament to its importance in prehistoric times. The consistent choice of certain species for different purposes, including the making of ornaments, is a direct representation of how humans viewed and exploited their environment. The necessary taxonomic information, however, is often impossible to obtain from objects that are small, heavily worked or degraded. Here we propose a novel biogeochemical approach to track the biological origin of prehistoric mollusc shell. We conducted an in-depth study of archaeological ornaments using microstructural, geochemical and biomolecular analyses, including 'palaeoshellomics', the first application of palaeoproteomics to mollusc shells (and indeed to any invertebrate calcified tissue). We reveal the consistent use of locally-sourced freshwater mother-of-pearl for the standardized manufacture of 'double-buttons'. This craft is found throughout Europe between 4200 - 3800 BCE, highlighting the ornament-makers' profound knowledge of the biogeosphere and the existence of cross-cultural traditions.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 4 and 5. All the mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with the data set identifier PXD011985

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jorune Sakalauskaite

    Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8029-8120
  2. Søren Andersen

    Moesgaard Museum, Højbjerg, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Paolo Biagi

    Department of Asian and North African Studies, University of Ca' Foscari, Venice, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Maria A Borrello

    Independent Researcher, Genève, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Théophile Cocquerez

    UMR CNRS 6282 Biogeosciences, University of Burgundy-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. André Carlo Colonese

    Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Federica Dal Bello

    Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0726-3025
  8. Alberto Girod

    Italian Malacological Society, Sorengo, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marion Heumüller

    Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Hanover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hannah Koon

    School of Archaeological and Forensic Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Giorgia Mandili

    Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Claudio Medana

    Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Kirsty E H Penkman

    Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6226-9799
  14. Laurent Plasseraud

    Institute of Molecular Chemistry, ICMUB UMR CNRS 6302, University of Burgundy-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Helmut Schlichtherle

    Landesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Sheila Taylor

    Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Caroline Tokarski

    Miniaturisation pour la Synthèse, l'Analyse and la Protéomique (MSAP), USR CNRS 3290, University of Lille, Lille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Jérôme Thomas

    UMR CNRS 6282 Biogeosciences, University of Burgundy-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1602-4416
  19. Julie Wilson

    Department of Mathematics, University of York, York, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Frédéric Marin

    UMR CNRS 6282 Biogeosciences, University of Burgundy-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Beatrice Demarchi

    Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
    For correspondence
    beatrice@palaeo.eu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8398-4409

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (Young Researchers)

  • Beatrice Demarchi

European Commission (PERG-GA-2010-268429)

  • Kirsty E H Penkman
  • Beatrice Demarchi

Leverhulme Trust

  • Kirsty E H Penkman

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Théophile Cocquerez
  • Laurent Plasseraud
  • Caroline Tokarski
  • Jérôme Thomas
  • Frédéric Marin

PHC Galilée programme, Italo-French University

  • Jorune Sakalauskaite
  • Frédéric Marin
  • Beatrice Demarchi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jessica C. Thompson, Yale University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: January 30, 2019
  2. Accepted: April 20, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 7, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 30, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Sakalauskaite et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,603
    views
  • 478
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jorune Sakalauskaite
  2. Søren Andersen
  3. Paolo Biagi
  4. Maria A Borrello
  5. Théophile Cocquerez
  6. André Carlo Colonese
  7. Federica Dal Bello
  8. Alberto Girod
  9. Marion Heumüller
  10. Hannah Koon
  11. Giorgia Mandili
  12. Claudio Medana
  13. Kirsty E H Penkman
  14. Laurent Plasseraud
  15. Helmut Schlichtherle
  16. Sheila Taylor
  17. Caroline Tokarski
  18. Jérôme Thomas
  19. Julie Wilson
  20. Frédéric Marin
  21. Beatrice Demarchi
(2019)
'Palaeoshellomics' reveals the use of freshwater mother-of-pearl in prehistory
eLife 8:e45644.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45644

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45644

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.