An engineered monomer binding-protein for α-synuclein efficiently inhibits the proliferation of amyloid fibrils

  1. Emil Dandanell Agerschou
  2. Patrick Flagmeier
  3. Theodora Saridaki
  4. Céline Galvagnion
  5. Daniel Komnig
  6. Laetitia Heid
  7. Vibha Prasad
  8. Hamed Shaykhalishahi
  9. Dieter Willbold
  10. Christopher M Dobson
  11. Aaron Voigt
  12. Björn Falkenburger  Is a corresponding author
  13. Wolfgang Hoyer  Is a corresponding author
  14. Alexander K Buell  Is a corresponding author
  1. Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
  2. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  3. RWTH Aachen University, Germany
  4. Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

Abstract

Removing or preventing the formation of α-synuclein aggregates is a plausible strategy against Parkinson's disease. To this end we have engineered the β-wrapin AS69 to bind monomeric α-synuclein with high affinity. In cultured cells, AS69 reduced the self-interaction of α-synuclein and the formation of visible α-synuclein aggregates. In flies, AS69 reduced α-synuclein aggregates and the locomotor deficit resulting from α-synuclein expression in neuronal cells. In biophysical experiments in vitro, AS69 highly sub-stoichiometrically inhibited both primary and autocatalytic secondary nucleation processes, even in the presence of a large excess of monomer. We present evidence that the AS69-α-synuclein complex, rather than the free AS69, is the inhibitory species responsible for sub-stoichiometric inhibition of secondary nucleation. These results represent a new paradigm that high affinity monomer binders can lead to strongly sub-stoichiometric inhibition of nucleation processes.

Data availability

- Numerical data represented in the graphs for cell culture and fly experiments will be made publicly available on osf.io as we did for previous publications.- The numerical data for the biophysical experiments will be made publicly available within the same repository on osf.io.- The raw images of the gels used in the publication will be made publicly available.All data have been deposited on osf.io ( https://osf.io/6n2gs/?view_only=7eb7024d8ecb460a817cd0ed35978339 ) and will be made available in the event of publication

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Emil Dandanell Agerschou

    Institute of Physical Biology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Patrick Flagmeier

    Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1204-5340
  3. Theodora Saridaki

    Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Céline Galvagnion

    Institute of Physical Biology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Daniel Komnig

    Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6312-5236
  6. Laetitia Heid

    Institute of Physical Biology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Vibha Prasad

    Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Hamed Shaykhalishahi

    Institute of Physical Biology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dieter Willbold

    Institute of Physical Biology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0065-7366
  10. Christopher M Dobson

    Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Aaron Voigt

    Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0428-7462
  12. Björn Falkenburger

    Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
    For correspondence
    bfalkenburger@ukaachen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Wolfgang Hoyer

    Institute of Physical Biology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    For correspondence
    wolfgang.hoyer@hhu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Alexander K Buell

    Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
    For correspondence
    alebu@dtu.dk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1161-3622

Funding

Leverhulme Trust

  • Alexander K Buell

Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds

  • Patrick Flagmeier

Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes

  • Patrick Flagmeier

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

  • Céline Galvagnion

Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Foundation

  • Alexander K Buell

H2020 European Research Council (MCSA grant agreement No 706551)

  • Céline Galvagnion

Novo Nordisk Foundation

  • Alexander K Buell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Agerschou et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,406
    views
  • 839
    downloads
  • 54
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Emil Dandanell Agerschou
  2. Patrick Flagmeier
  3. Theodora Saridaki
  4. Céline Galvagnion
  5. Daniel Komnig
  6. Laetitia Heid
  7. Vibha Prasad
  8. Hamed Shaykhalishahi
  9. Dieter Willbold
  10. Christopher M Dobson
  11. Aaron Voigt
  12. Björn Falkenburger
  13. Wolfgang Hoyer
  14. Alexander K Buell
(2019)
An engineered monomer binding-protein for α-synuclein efficiently inhibits the proliferation of amyloid fibrils
eLife 8:e46112.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46112

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46112

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Marine Schimel, Ta-Chu Kao, Guillaume Hennequin
    Research Article

    During delayed ballistic reaches, motor areas consistently display movement-specific activity patterns prior to movement onset. It is unclear why these patterns arise: while they have been proposed to seed an initial neural state from which the movement unfolds, recent experiments have uncovered the presence and necessity of ongoing inputs during movement, which may lessen the need for careful initialization. Here, we modeled the motor cortex as an input-driven dynamical system, and we asked what the optimal way to control this system to perform fast delayed reaches is. We find that delay-period inputs consistently arise in an optimally controlled model of M1. By studying a variety of network architectures, we could dissect and predict the situations in which it is beneficial for a network to prepare. Finally, we show that optimal input-driven control of neural dynamics gives rise to multiple phases of preparation during reach sequences, providing a novel explanation for experimentally observed features of monkey M1 activity in double reaching.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jing Jun Wong, Alessandro Bongioanni ... Bolton KH Chau
    Research Article

    Humans make irrational decisions in the presence of irrelevant distractor options. There is little consensus on whether decision making is facilitated or impaired by the presence of a highly rewarding distractor, or whether the distractor effect operates at the level of options’ component attributes rather than at the level of their overall value. To reconcile different claims, we argue that it is important to consider the diversity of people’s styles of decision making and whether choice attributes are combined in an additive or multiplicative way. Employing a multi-laboratory dataset investigating the same experimental paradigm, we demonstrated that people used a mix of both approaches and the extent to which approach was used varied across individuals. Critically, we identified that this variability was correlated with the distractor effect during decision making. Individuals who tended to use a multiplicative approach to compute value, showed a positive distractor effect. In contrast, a negative distractor effect (divisive normalisation) was prominent in individuals tending towards an additive approach. Findings suggest that the distractor effect is related to how value is constructed, which in turn may be influenced by task and subject specificities. This concurs with recent behavioural and neuroscience findings that multiple distractor effects co-exist.