Family history of Alzheimer's disease alters cognition and is modified by medical and genetic factors

  1. Joshua S Talboom
  2. Asta K Håberg
  3. Matthew D De Both
  4. Marcus A Naymik
  5. Isabelle Schrauwen
  6. Candace R Lewis
  7. Stacy F Bertinelli
  8. Callie Hammersland
  9. Mason A Fritz
  10. Amanda J Myers
  11. Meredith Hay
  12. Carol A Barnes
  13. Elizabeth Glisky
  14. Lee Ryan
  15. Matthew J Huentelman  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Translational Genomics Research Institute, United States
  2. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
  3. University of Miami, United States
  4. Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, United States

Abstract

In humans, a first-degree family history of dementia (FH) is a well-documented risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the influence of FH on cognition across the lifespan is poorly understood. To address this issue, we developed an internet-based paired-associates learning (PAL) task and tested 59,571 participants between the ages of 18-85. FH was associated with lower PAL performance in both sexes under 65 years old. Modifiers of this effect of FH on PAL performance included age, sex, education, and diabetes. The Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele was also associated with lower PAL scores in FH positive individuals. Here we show, FH is associated with reduced PAL performance four decades before the typical onset of AD; additionally, several heritable and non-heritable modifiers of this effect were identified.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are freely available at Dryad (https://datadryad.org) doi:10.5061/dryad.2867k2m.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Joshua S Talboom

    The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4327-4103
  2. Asta K Håberg

    Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Matthew D De Both

    The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marcus A Naymik

    The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Isabelle Schrauwen

    The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Candace R Lewis

    The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Stacy F Bertinelli

    The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Callie Hammersland

    The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Mason A Fritz

    The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Amanda J Myers

    Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Meredith Hay

    Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Carol A Barnes

    Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Elizabeth Glisky

    Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Lee Ryan

    Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, Phoenix, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Matthew J Huentelman

    The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, United States
    For correspondence
    mhuentelman@tgen.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7390-9918

Funding

Mueller Family Charitable Trust

  • Matthew J Huentelman

Arizona DHS in support of the Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium

  • Matthew J Huentelman

Flinn Foundation

  • Matthew J Huentelman

National Institutes of Health (R01- AG041232)

  • Amanda J Myers

National Institutes of Health (R01-AG049465-05)

  • Carol A Barnes

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: For all participants, informed consent, and consent to publish was obtained before study participation. This protocol and consent were approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB, protocol #20111988).

Copyright

© 2019, Talboom et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,941
    views
  • 627
    downloads
  • 26
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Joshua S Talboom
  2. Asta K Håberg
  3. Matthew D De Both
  4. Marcus A Naymik
  5. Isabelle Schrauwen
  6. Candace R Lewis
  7. Stacy F Bertinelli
  8. Callie Hammersland
  9. Mason A Fritz
  10. Amanda J Myers
  11. Meredith Hay
  12. Carol A Barnes
  13. Elizabeth Glisky
  14. Lee Ryan
  15. Matthew J Huentelman
(2019)
Family history of Alzheimer's disease alters cognition and is modified by medical and genetic factors
eLife 8:e46179.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46179

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46179

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Emily M Adamic, Adam R Teed ... Sahib Khalsa
    Research Article

    Interactions between top-down attention and bottom-up visceral inputs are assumed to produce conscious perceptions of interoceptive states, and while each process has been independently associated with aberrant interoceptive symptomatology in psychiatric disorders, the neural substrates of this interface are unknown. We conducted a preregistered functional neuroimaging study of 46 individuals with anxiety, depression, and/or eating disorders (ADE) and 46 propensity-matched healthy comparisons (HC), comparing their neural activity across two interoceptive tasks differentially recruiting top-down or bottom-up processing within the same scan session. During an interoceptive attention task, top-down attention was voluntarily directed towards cardiorespiratory or visual signals. In contrast, during an interoceptive perturbation task, intravenous infusions of isoproterenol (a peripherally-acting beta-adrenergic receptor agonist) were administered in a double-blinded and placebo-controlled fashion to drive bottom-up cardiorespiratory sensations. Across both tasks, neural activation converged upon the insular cortex, localizing within the granular and ventral dysgranular subregions bilaterally. However, contrasting hemispheric differences emerged, with the ADE group exhibiting (relative to HCs) an asymmetric pattern of overlap in the left insula, with increased or decreased proportions of co-activated voxels within the left or right dysgranular insula, respectively. The ADE group also showed less agranular anterior insula activation during periods of bodily uncertainty (i.e. when anticipating possible isoproterenol-induced changes that never arrived). Finally, post-task changes in insula functional connectivity were associated with anxiety and depression severity. These findings confirm the dysgranular mid-insula as a key cortical interface where attention and prediction meet real-time bodily inputs, especially during heightened awareness of interoceptive states. Furthermore, the dysgranular mid-insula may indeed be a ‘locus of disruption’ for psychiatric disorders.

    1. Medicine
    Yanling Huang, Haocong Mo ... Geyang Xu
    Research Article

    Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a gut-derived hormone secreted by intestinal L cells and vital for postprandial glycemic control. As open-type enteroendocrine cells, whether L cells can sense mechanical stimuli caused by chyme and thus regulate GLP-1 synthesis and secretion is unexplored. Molecular biology techniques revealed the expression of Piezo1 in intestinal L cells. Its level varied in different energy status and correlates with blood glucose and GLP-1 levels. Mice with L cell-specific loss of Piezo1 (Piezo1 IntL-CKO) exhibited impaired glucose tolerance, increased body weight, reduced GLP-1 production and decreased CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway under normal chow diet or high-fat diet. Activation of the intestinal Piezo1 by its agonist Yoda1 or intestinal bead implantation increased the synthesis and secretion of GLP-1, thus alleviated glucose intolerance in diet-induced-diabetic mice. Overexpression of Piezo1, Yoda1 treatment or stretching stimulated GLP-1 production and CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway, which could be abolished by knockdown or blockage of Piezo1 in primary cultured mouse L cells and STC-1 cells. These experimental results suggest a previously unknown regulatory mechanism for GLP-1 production in L cells, which could offer new insights into diabetes treatments.