Spinal motor neurons (MNs) innervating the limb are contained within the lateral motor columns (LMCs), which are produced specifically at brachial and lumbar levels of the spinal cord. LMC neurons are subsequently divided into two populations, lateral LMC (LMCl) neurons that innervate the dorsal part of the limb and medial LMC (LMCm) neurons that innervate the ventral part of the limb (Landmesser, 1978; Hollyday, 1980a; Hollyday, 1980b; Tosney and Landmesser, 1985b; Tosney and Landmesser, 1985a; Sockanathan et al., 2003; Ji et al., 2006). The molecular mechanism of how morphogenetic signaling molecules cooperate with transcription factors to define MN subtype specification has been extensively studied (Shirasaki and Pfaff, 2002; Lee and Pfaff, 2001). Retinoic acid (RA) is essential for the diversification of MN subtype and MN columnar organization. At brachial level, within the LMCs, RA is synthesized in subpopulations of MNs expressing the RA-synthesizing enzyme, RALDH2, and specifies migrating MN precursor cells into the LMCl neurons (Vermot et al., 2005; Sockanathan et al., 2003). However, it remains poorly understood whether other signaling molecules also contribute to the specification and/or maintenance of LMC and other MN columns.

Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling is a highly conserved pathway that is essential in directing cell proliferation and patterning during early embryogenesis (Ingham et al., 2011; Briscoe and Thérond, 2013). In spinal neuron development, Shh, released from the notochord and floor plate, leads to the generation of distinct classes of progenitor domains including MN progenitor (pMN) within the ventral side of spinal cord (Lee and Pfaff, 2001). In Shh-responsive cells, protein kinase A (PKA) plays crucial roles in fate specification and proliferation by modulating the activity of Shh signaling (Kotani, 2012; Asaoka, 2012). In the absence of Shh, PKA phosphorylates Gli transcription factors, promoting the production of repressor forms of Gli and thus repressing the Shh target gene expression, while Shh antagonizes this action of PKA (Pan et al., 2009). As both decreased and increased activity of PKA results in abnormal cell proliferation and cell fate specification, the basal level of PKA activity should be precisely controlled spatiotemporally to ensure its proper action (Kotani, 2012). PKA activation occurs upon binding of cyclic AMP (cAMP) to its regulatory subunits (PKAR), causing the release of its catalytic subunits (PKAC) (Taylor et al., 1990). Shh is able to induce phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-kinase)-dependent AKT phosphorylation in cell lines such as LIGHT cells and HUVEC cells (Kanda et al., 2003; Riobó et al., 2006). Interestingly, PI3-kinase-dependent AKT activation further potentiates Shh signaling in the neuronal fate specification (Riobó et al., 2006). It was suggested that AKT might target proteins that modulate PKA kinase activity or the interaction between PKA and Gli (Riobó et al., 2006), but the identity of such proteins remain unknown.

During MN development, two LIM-homeodomain (LIM-HD) transcription factors, Islet-1 (Isl1) and LIM homeobox-3 (Lhx3) act as essential players in MN fate specification (Pfaff et al., 1996; Sharma et al., 1998; Tanabe et al., 1998; Thaler et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2013) by forming a hexameric complex, named the Isl1-Lhx3 complex, which consists of two Isl1:Lhx3 dimers and a nuclear LIM interactor (NLI) dimer (Lee et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2013). Genome-wide analyses of the Isl1-Lhx3 complex binding sites from chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) datasets (Lee et al., 2013; Mazzoni et al., 2013) combined with MN transcriptome analyses (Lee et al., 2012; Mazzoni et al., 2013) identified many novel signaling pathways and regulators that are directly regulated by the Isl1-Lhx3 complex. Studies of individual target genes of the Isl1-Lhx3 complex in MN specification uncovered critical effector genes in MN specification such as genes involved in cholinergic neuronal identity determination (Cho et al., 2014), miR-218 as a downstream effector of Isl1-Lhx3 complex (Thiebes et al., 2015) and STAM1 as an endosomal sorting machinery necessary for ventral motor axon projection (Nam and Lee, 2016).

ARHGAP36, a putative Rho GTPase-activating protein, was identified from a genome-scale cDNA overexpression screen as a positive regulator of the Shh pathway (Rack et al., 2014). Overexpression of ARHGAP36 recapitulates Shh signaling transduction and these effects are independent of Smo and require kinesin family member 3a (Kif3a) and intraflagellar transport protein 88 (Ift88) (Rack et al., 2014). Recently, ARHGAP36 has emerged as a potent antagonist of PKA signaling. ARHGAP36 interacts with PKAC and inhibits PKAC catalytic activity as a PKA pseudosubstrate inhibitor (Eccles et al., 2016). It also targets PKAC for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis by the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) pathway (Eccles et al., 2016). Moreover, ARHGAP36 interaction with Patched1 leads to the removal of centrosomal ARHGAP36 with ciliary Patched1 and the accumulation of centrosomal PKA that phosphorylates Inversin and this Patched1-ARHGAP36-PKA-Inversin axis determines the ciliary translocation of Smoothened and consequent hedgehog pathway activation (Zhang et al., 2019). Although recent studies in cultured cells suggest that ARHGAP36 regulates Shh activity through inhibiting PKA kinase activity, it remains unexplored whether ARHGAP36 functions as a key modulator of Shh signaling pathway in vivo.

Here we report that Shh expression is induced in postmitotic MNs at brachial and lumbar levels but not at thoracic level at later stages of development when motor columnar identities are established. Shh is required for proper LMC formation as the knock-down of Shh in the developing chick spinal cord and the deletion of Shh in the developing MNs of mouse embryos result in reduction of FoxP1⁺ LMC. We further show that ARHGAP36 is a critical MN-enriched Shh transduction component and Arhgap36 is a direct target gene of Isl1-Lhx3 complex during MN generation. The action of ARHGAP36 is to promote Gli-dependent transactivation partly through inhibition of PKA activity. Moreover, AKT, known as an inhibitor of PKA activity, interacts with ARHGAP36 and stabilizes ARHGAP36 protein, which further enforces suppression of PKA activity by ARHGAP36. Consistently, blocking AKT activity reduces the protein level of ARHGAP36 and hinders the efficiency of in vitro MN differentiation from mouse ESCs. Consistently, deletion of Arhgap36 gene in mouse results in defects in LMC formation at brachial level, which might be caused by dysregulation of Shh signaling pathway. Our results define a new regulatory axis of Shh-AKT-ARHGAP36-PKA in LMC specification, in which ARHGAP36 functions as an essential effector of Shh and AKT in repressing PKA activity.

While the role of Shh signaling pathway to induce ventral progenitor domains in the spinal cord has been relatively well characterized (Persson et al., 2002; Jessell, 2000), its role in LMC specification has not been studied. In this report, we discovered a novel role of Shh in inducing LMC specification, which involves coordination of multiple signaling pathways by ARHGAP36, a key modulator of Shh signaling pathway. First, we discovered that Shh is expressed in MNs at brachial and lumbar levels of the spinal cord where LMC neurons are specified and is required for proper LMC formation in developing chick and mouse spinal cord (Figures 1–3). Second, we identified ARHGAP36, along with Shh, as a protein highly expressed in the LMC regions of differentiating MNs (Figure 5C). Third, ARHGAP36 modulates the activity of PKA, an inhibitor of Shh pathway, thereby enhancing the activity of Gli-dependent transcription in the spinal cord (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Fourth, ARHGAP36 levels seem to be tightly regulated by AKT during MN generation, as shown by the increase of ARHGAP36 protein levels by WT AKT and a constitutively active form of AKT and a decrease in ARHGAP36 levels by a dominant negative form of AKT and AKT inhibitor (Figure 7 and Figure 7—figure supplements 1–2). Fifth, deletion of Arhgap36 in mouse results in specific reduction of FoxP1⁺ LMC MNs in the developing mouse embryonic spinal cord (Figure 8), which is similar to what was observed in Shh knock-down chick spinal cord and Shh-cKO mouse spinal cord (Figures 2 and 3). Taken together, our results reveal a regulatory axis consisting of Shh-AKT-ARHGAP36-PKA, which plays crucial roles in modulating the activity of Shh signaling in a spatiotemporal manner for LMC specification.

Once MN progenitors, produced in the pMN progenitor domain of the ventral neural tube in response to the morphogen Shh, give birth to MNs (Jessell, 2000), MNs are further organized into distinct motor columns that are responsible for innervating each target muscle along the rostral-caudal neural tube (Dasen and Jessell, 2009; Stifani, 2014). MMC neurons innervate dorsal epaxial muscles, whereas HMC neurons project to the ventral hypaxial muscles. The LMC neurons innervate limb muscles and PGC neurons innervate sympathetic ganglia (Stifani, 2014; Dasen and Jessell, 2009). Motor column specific transcription factors and morphogenetic signaling molecules collaborate to define MN subtype specification (Shirasaki and Pfaff, 2002; Lee and Pfaff, 2001). RA is essential for the diversification of MN subtype and MN columnar organization. Also Hox genes, which encode a family of transcription factors, determine MN subtypes and there is a clear relationship between Hox protein expression and motor columnar specification. Moreover, FoxP1 has been shown to function as a critical Hox cofactor in regulating MN subtype diversity especially for specification of both the LMC and PGC neurons (Rousso et al., 2008; Pfaff, 2008; Dasen et al., 2008; Arber, 2008). It has been shown that abnormal expression of Hox proteins within postmitotic MNs result in subtype switching (Jung et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2008; Dasen et al., 2005; Lin and Carpenter, 2003). The spatiotemporal expression of these HD factors together with extrinsic signaling suggest that MN subtype identity remains plastic even after they exit the cell cycle and it should be tightly regulated to generate proper MN columnar subtypes. It is intriguing that two prominent extrinsic cues, RA and Shh, participate in LMC specification. Future studies should be directed at elucidating whether Shh pathway involving ARHGAP36 integrates with RA and Hox genes in LMC specification.

Because LMC and PGC neurons do not express Lhx3, it is not clear whether ARHGAP36 induced by the Isl1-Lhx3 complex at earlier stages of MN development (Figure 5) persists in LMC and PGC neurons or another mechanism independently induces the expression of ARHGAP36 in these specific motor columns at later stages. Because Shh stabilizes ARHGAP36 through AKT activation (Figure 7) and Shh is only expressed in LMC neurons at later developmental stages (Figure 1), Shh may be responsible for the continuous existence of ARHGAP36 at least in LMC neurons via its ability to stabilize ARHGAP36 protein. It is also possible that Hox and its cofactor Pbx may additionally upregulate the expression of ARHGAP36 at later stages of MN columnar specification (Hanley et al., 2016).

We found that there was no obvious defect in the general MN formation in Arhgap36 knockout mouse embryonic spinal cord at early stages, suggesting that its function is not necessary for the initial MN differentiation. This conclusion is supported by the lack of Shh expression in early born MNs and with our notion that Shh agonist is likely needed for the activity of ARHGAP36 (Figure 6—figure supplement 2) as well as our finding that overexpression of AKT shows specific effect only on FoxP1⁺ LMC neurons (Figure 7). Because ARHGAP36 is also expressed in early born MNs, however, ARHGAP36 may also have a critical role in initial MN generation. This action of ARHGAP36 may have a redundant functional homologue, given no deficits were observed in early MN generation in Arhgap36 knockout mouse embryonic spinal cord. Furthermore, there was no obvious defect even in the LMC formation in male mutant spinal cord at later stages. Based on the amino acid sequence of ARHGAP36, it is predicted to be a Rho GAP family member, but it lacks the ‘arginine finger’ motif for Rho GTPase activity (Rittinger et al., 1997), suggesting that the catalytic GAP domain is not required for Gli activation. Arhgap6 is the closest homolog of Arhgap36, which does not affect Shh activation (Rack et al., 2014). It will be interesting to further investigate whether another functional homologue to ARHGAP36 controls initial MN generation as well as LMC formation particularly in male embryos. At E12.5, we observed that LMCm (Isl1⁺/FoxP1⁺) neurons are increased, whereas LMCl (Lhx1⁺/FoxP1⁺) neurons are decreased in Arhgap36 mutant spinal cord (Figure 8—figure supplement 1). But later on, the number of FoxP1⁺ LMC neurons decreased significantly in Arhgap36 deficient mouse embryonic spinal cord. These results suggest that the increased early born LMCm neurons in the Arhgap36 mutant spinal cord somehow adopt other cell fates or degenerate. These possibilities need to be further investigated in the future. Later born LMCl neurons have to migrate through earlier born LMCs (Sockanathan et al., 2003; Maden, 2006) but it is not known whether early born LMCm neurons can change their fate into LMCl neurons by receiving signals such as RA and Shh from the neighboring cells. It will be interesting to further investigate whether early born LMCm neurons affect LMCl neuron specification through Shh signaling pathway and its modulator ARHGAP36.

In the developing central nervous system, a number of differentiated cells degenerate during development (Buss et al., 2006; Oppenheim, 1991). Initially overproduced MNs undergo cell death by competing for a limited amount of neurotropic factors when they arrive at the target muscles (Yamamoto and Henderson, 1999). LMC neuronal axons navigate through a very long distance to their final destinations by integrating intrinsic factors and extrinsic pro- and anti-apoptotic signals. Based on the well-known function of AKT in cell survival, we speculate that ARHGAP36 proteins stabilized by AKT may also function to maintain the proper number of differentiated LMC neurons by blocking their apoptosis. Indeed, we observed an increase in cell death with a reduction of FoxP1⁺ LMC neurons in Arhgap36 KO mouse (Figure 8—figure supplement 1D), suggesting that ARHGAP36 may function as an essential downstream effector of AKT-directed cell survival.

It remains to be further investigated how ARHGAP36 affects the FoxP1⁺ LMC cell fate specification. It has been shown that FoxP1 expression is regulated by PI3K/AKT/p70S6K signaling cascade in breast cancer (Halacli and Dogan, 2015). These results further support our proposal that the expression of FoxP1 in LMC neurons is likely regulated by activated AKT in collaboration with ARHGAP36. Furthermore, ARHGAP36 is up-regulated in medulloblastoma where Shh pathway is aberrantly activated (Rack et al., 2014), suggesting that similar mechanisms may be applied to tumorigenesis. Therefore, it will be interesting to further study the function of ARHGAP36 in Shh-dependent tumorigenesis, for instance using the cerebellar granule neuron progenitors (GNPs) from Arhgap36^-/- mice.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

1. 1. Lee S
   2. Shen R
   3. Cho HH
   4. Kwon RJ
   5. Seo SY
   6. Lee JW
   7. Lee SK

   (2013) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus

   ID GSE50993. STAT3 promotes motor neuron differentiation by collaborating with motor neuron-specific LIM complex.

   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE50993
2. 1. Mazzoni EO
   2. Mahony S
   3. Closser M
   4. Morrison CA
   5. Nedelec S
   6. Williams DJ
   7. An D
   8. Gifford DK
   9. Wichterle H

   (2013) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus

   ID GSE31456. Synergistic binding of transcription factors to cell-specific enhancers programs motor neuron identity.

   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE31456

1. 1. Arber S

   (2008) FoxP1: conducting the hox symphony in spinal motor neurons

   Nature Neuroscience 11:1122–1124.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1008-1122

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Asaoka Y

   (2012) Phosphorylation of Gli by cAMP-dependent protein kinase

   Vitamins and Hormones 88:293–307.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394622-5.00013-4

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Bitgood MJ
   2. McMahon AP

   (1995) Hedgehog and Bmp genes are coexpressed at many diverse sites of cell-cell interaction in the mouse embryo

   Developmental Biology 172:126–138.

   https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1995.0010

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Briscoe J
   2. Thérond PP

   (2013) The mechanisms of hedgehog signalling and its roles in development and disease

   Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 14:416–429.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3598

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Buss RR
   2. Sun W
   3. Oppenheim RW

   (2006) Adaptive roles of programmed cell death during nervous system development

   Annual Review of Neuroscience 29:1–35.

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112800

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Cho HH
   2. Cargnin F
   3. Kim Y
   4. Lee B
   5. Kwon RJ
   6. Nam H
   7. Shen R
   8. Barnes AP
   9. Lee JW
   10. Lee S
   11. Lee SK

   (2014) Isl1 directly controls a cholinergic neuronal identity in the developing forebrain and spinal cord by forming cell type-specific complexes

   PLOS Genetics 10:e1004280.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004280

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Dasen JS
   2. Tice BC
   3. Brenner-Morton S
   4. Jessell TM

   (2005) A hox regulatory network establishes motor neuron pool identity and target-muscle connectivity

   Cell 123:477–491.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.009

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Dasen JS
   2. De Camilli A
   3. Wang B
   4. Tucker PW
   5. Jessell TM

   (2008) Hox repertoires for motor neuron diversity and connectivity gated by a single accessory factor, FoxP1

   Cell 134:304–316.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.019

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Dasen JS
   2. Jessell TM

   (2009) Hox networks and the origins of motor neuron diversity

   Current Topics in Developmental Biology 88:169–200.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(09)88006-X

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Dessaud E
    2. Yang LL
    3. Hill K
    4. Cox B
    5. Ulloa F
    6. Ribeiro A
    7. Mynett A
    8. Novitch BG
    9. Briscoe J

    (2007) Interpretation of the sonic hedgehog morphogen gradient by a temporal adaptation mechanism

    Nature 450:717–720.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06347

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Eccles RL
    2. Czajkowski MT
    3. Barth C
    4. Müller PM
    5. McShane E
    6. Grunwald S
    7. Beaudette P
    8. Mecklenburg N
    9. Volkmer R
    10. Zühlke K
    11. Dittmar G
    12. Selbach M
    13. Hammes A
    14. Daumke O
    15. Klussmann E
    16. Urbé S
    17. Rocks O

    (2016) Bimodal antagonism of PKA signalling by ARHGAP36

    Nature Communications 7:12963.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12963

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Grewal SS
    2. Fass DM
    3. Yao H
    4. Ellig CL
    5. Goodman RH
    6. Stork PJ

    (2000) Calcium and cAMP signals differentially regulate cAMP-responsive element-binding protein function via a Rap1-extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 275:34433–34441.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M004728200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Halacli SO
    2. Dogan AL

    (2015) FOXP1 regulation via the PI3K/Akt/p70S6K signaling pathway in breast Cancer cells

    Oncology Letters 9:1482–1488.

    https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.2885

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Hanley O
    2. Zewdu R
    3. Cohen LJ
    4. Jung H
    5. Lacombe J
    6. Philippidou P
    7. Lee DH
    8. Selleri L
    9. Dasen JS

    (2016) Parallel Pbx-Dependent pathways govern the coalescence and fate of motor columns

    Neuron 91:1005–1020.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.043

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Harfe BD
    2. Scherz PJ
    3. Nissim S
    4. Tian H
    5. McMahon AP
    6. Tabin CJ

    (2004) Evidence for an expansion-based temporal Shh gradient in specifying vertebrate digit identities

    Cell 118:517–528.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.024

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Harrison KA
    2. Thaler J
    3. Pfaff SL
    4. Gu H
    5. Kehrl JH

    (1999) Pancreas dorsal lobe agenesis and abnormal islets of Langerhans in Hlxb9-deficient mice

    Nature Genetics 23:71–75.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/12674

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Hollyday M

    (1980a) Motoneuron histogenesis and the development of limb innervation

    Current Topics in Developmental Biology 15 Pt 1:181–215.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(08)60120-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Hollyday M

    (1980b) Organization of motor pools in the chick lumbar lateral motor column

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 194:143–170.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901940108

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Iacovino M
    2. Bosnakovski D
    3. Fey H
    4. Rux D
    5. Bajwa G
    6. Mahen E
    7. Mitanoska A
    8. Xu Z
    9. Kyba M

    (2011) Inducible cassette exchange: a rapid and efficient system enabling conditional gene expression in embryonic stem and primary cells

    Stem Cells 29:1580–1588.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.715

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Ingham PW
    2. Nakano Y
    3. Seger C

    (2011) Mechanisms and functions of hedgehog signalling across the metazoa

    Nature Reviews Genetics 12:393–406.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2984

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Itou J
    2. Kawakami H
    3. Quach T
    4. Osterwalder M
    5. Evans SM
    6. Zeller R
    7. Kawakami Y

    (2012) Islet1 regulates establishment of the posterior hindlimb field upstream of the Hand2-Shh morphoregulatory gene network in mouse embryos

    Development 139:1620–1629.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.073056

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Iyer GH
    2. Garrod S
    3. Woods VL
    4. Taylor SS

    (2005) Catalytic independent functions of a protein kinase as revealed by a kinase-dead mutant: study of the Lys72His mutant of cAMP-dependent kinase

    Journal of Molecular Biology 351:1110–1122.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Jessell TM

    (2000) Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: inductive signals and transcriptional codes

    Nature Reviews Genetics 1:20–29.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/35049541

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Ji SJ
    2. Zhuang B
    3. Falco C
    4. Schneider A
    5. Schuster-Gossler K
    6. Gossler A
    7. Sockanathan S

    (2006) Mesodermal and neuronal retinoids regulate the induction and maintenance of limb innervating spinal motor neurons

    Developmental Biology 297:249–261.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Jinek M
    2. Chylinski K
    3. Fonfara I
    4. Hauer M
    5. Doudna JA
    6. Charpentier E

    (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity

    Science 337:816–821.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Jung H
    2. Lacombe J
    3. Mazzoni EO
    4. Liem KF
    5. Grinstein J
    6. Mahony S
    7. Mukhopadhyay D
    8. Gifford DK
    9. Young RA
    10. Anderson KV
    11. Wichterle H
    12. Dasen JS

    (2010) Global control of motor neuron topography mediated by the repressive actions of a single hox gene

    Neuron 67:781–796.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Kanda S
    2. Mochizuki Y
    3. Suematsu T
    4. Miyata Y
    5. Nomata K
    6. Kanetake H

    (2003) Sonic hedgehog induces capillary morphogenesis by endothelial cells through phosphoinositide 3-kinase

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:8244–8249.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M210635200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Kotani T

    (2012) Protein kinase A activity and hedgehog signaling pathway

    Vitamins and Hormones 88:273–291.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394622-5.00012-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Landmesser L

    (1978) The distribution of motoneurones supplying chick hind limb muscles

    The Journal of Physiology 284:371–389.

    https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012545

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Lee SK
    2. Jurata LW
    3. Funahashi J
    4. Ruiz EC
    5. Pfaff SL

    (2004) Analysis of embryonic motoneuron gene regulation: derepression of general activators function in concert with enhancer factors

    Development 131:3295–3306.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01179

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Lee S
    2. Lee B
    3. Joshi K
    4. Pfaff SL
    5. Lee JW
    6. Lee SK

    (2008) A regulatory network to segregate the identity of neuronal subtypes

    Developmental Cell 14:877–889.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.021

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Lee S
    2. Cuvillier JM
    3. Lee B
    4. Shen R
    5. Lee JW
    6. Lee SK

    (2012) Fusion protein Isl1-Lhx3 specifies motor neuron fate by inducing motor neuron genes and concomitantly suppressing the interneuron programs

    PNAS 109:3383–3388.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114515109

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Lee S
    2. Shen R
    3. Cho HH
    4. Kwon RJ
    5. Seo SY
    6. Lee JW
    7. Lee SK

    (2013) STAT3 promotes motor neuron differentiation by collaborating with motor neuron-specific LIM complex

    PNAS 110:11445–11450.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302676110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Lee SK
    2. Pfaff SL

    (2001) Transcriptional networks regulating neuronal identity in the developing spinal cord

    Nature Neuroscience 4:1183–1191.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn750

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Lee SK
    2. Pfaff SL

    (2003) Synchronization of neurogenesis and motor neuron specification by direct coupling of bHLH and homeodomain transcription factors

    Neuron 38:731–745.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00296-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Lewis PM
    2. Dunn MP
    3. McMahon JA
    4. Logan M
    5. Martin JF
    6. St-Jacques B
    7. McMahon AP

    (2001) Cholesterol modification of sonic hedgehog is required for long-range signaling activity and effective modulation of signaling by Ptc1

    Cell 105:599–612.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00369-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Lin AW
    2. Carpenter EM

    (2003) Hoxa10 and Hoxd10 coordinately regulate lumbar motor neuron patterning

    Journal of Neurobiology 56:328–337.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.10239

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Maden M

    (2006) Retinoids and spinal cord development

    Journal of Neurobiology 66:726–738.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.20248

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Mali RS
    2. Peng GH
    3. Zhang X
    4. Dang L
    5. Chen S
    6. Mitton KP

    (2008) FIZ1 is part of the regulatory protein complex on active photoreceptor-specific gene promoters in vivo

    BMC Molecular Biology 9:87.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-9-87

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Martí E
    2. Bovolenta P

    (2002) Sonic hedgehog in CNS development: one signal, multiple outputs

    Trends in Neurosciences 25:89–96.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02062-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Mazzoni EO
    2. Mahony S
    3. Closser M
    4. Morrison CA
    5. Nedelec S
    6. Williams DJ
    7. An D
    8. Gifford DK
    9. Wichterle H

    (2013) Synergistic binding of transcription factors to cell-specific enhancers programs motor neuron identity

    Nature Neuroscience 16:1219–1227.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3467

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Nam H
    2. Lee S

    (2016) Identification of STAM1 as a novel effector of ventral projection of spinal motor neurons

    Development 143:2334–2343.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.135848

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Nichols M
    2. Weih F
    3. Schmid W
    4. DeVack C
    5. Kowenz-Leutz E
    6. Luckow B
    7. Boshart M
    8. Schütz G

    (1992) Phosphorylation of CREB affects its binding to high and low affinity sites: implications for cAMP induced gene transcription

    The EMBO Journal 11:3337–3346.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05412.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Oppenheim RW

    (1991) Cell death during development of the nervous system

    Annual Review of Neuroscience 14:453–501.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.14.030191.002321

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Oppenheim RW
    2. Homma S
    3. Marti E
    4. Prevette D
    5. Wang S
    6. Yaginuma H
    7. McMahon AP

    (1999) Modulation of early but not later stages of programmed cell death in embryonic avian spinal cord by sonic hedgehog

    Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 13:348–361.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/mcne.1999.0755

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Pan Y
    2. Wang C
    3. Wang B

    (2009) Phosphorylation of Gli2 by protein kinase A is required for Gli2 processing and degradation and the sonic Hedgehog-regulated mouse development

    Developmental Biology 326:177–189.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.11.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Persson M
    2. Stamataki D
    3. te Welscher P
    4. Andersson E
    5. Böse J
    6. Rüther U
    7. Ericson J
    8. Briscoe J

    (2002) Dorsal-ventral patterning of the spinal cord requires Gli3 transcriptional repressor activity

    Genes & Development 16:2865–2878.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.243402

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Peviani M
    2. Tortarolo M
    3. Battaglia E
    4. Piva R
    5. Bendotti C

    (2014) Specific induction of Akt3 in spinal cord motor neurons is neuroprotective in a mouse model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Molecular Neurobiology 49:136–148.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-013-8507-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Pfaff SL
    2. Mendelsohn M
    3. Stewart CL
    4. Edlund T
    5. Jessell TM

    (1996) Requirement for LIM homeobox gene Isl1 in motor neuron generation reveals a motor neuron-dependent step in interneuron differentiation

    Cell 84:309–320.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80985-X

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Pfaff SL

    (2008) Developmental neuroscience: hox and fox

    Nature 455:295–297.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/455295a

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Rack PG
    2. Ni J
    3. Payumo AY
    4. Nguyen V
    5. Crapster JA
    6. Hovestadt V
    7. Kool M
    8. Jones DT
    9. Mich JK
    10. Firestone AJ
    11. Pfister SM
    12. Cho YJ
    13. Chen JK

    (2014) Arhgap36-dependent activation of Gli transcription factors

    PNAS 111:11061–11066.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322362111

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Ran FA
    2. Hsu PD
    3. Wright J
    4. Agarwala V
    5. Scott DA
    6. Zhang F

    (2013) Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system

    Nature Protocols 8:2281–2308.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.143

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Riobó NA
    2. Lu K
    3. Ai X
    4. Haines GM
    5. Emerson CP

    (2006) Phosphoinositide 3-kinase and Akt are essential for sonic hedgehog signaling

    PNAS 103:4505–4510.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504337103

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Rittinger K
    2. Walker PA
    3. Eccleston JF
    4. Nurmahomed K
    5. Owen D
    6. Laue E
    7. Gamblin SJ
    8. Smerdon SJ

    (1997) Crystal structure of a small G protein in complex with the GTPase-activating protein rhoGAP

    Nature 388:693–697.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/41805

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Rousso DL
    2. Gaber ZB
    3. Wellik D
    4. Morrisey EE
    5. Novitch BG

    (2008) Coordinated actions of the forkhead protein Foxp1 and hox proteins in the columnar organization of spinal motor neurons

    Neuron 59:226–240.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.025

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Sagner A
    2. Gaber ZB
    3. Delile J
    4. Kong JH
    5. Rousso DL
    6. Pearson CA
    7. Weicksel SE
    8. Melchionda M
    9. Mousavy Gharavy SN
    10. Briscoe J
    11. Novitch BG

    (2018) Olig2 and hes regulatory dynamics during motor neuron differentiation revealed by single cell transcriptomics

    PLOS Biology 16:e2003127.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003127

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Sharma K
    2. Sheng HZ
    3. Lettieri K
    4. Li H
    5. Karavanov A
    6. Potter S
    7. Westphal H
    8. Pfaff SL

    (1998) LIM homeodomain factors Lhx3 and Lhx4 assign subtype identities for motor neurons

    Cell 95:817–828.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81704-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Shirasaki R
    2. Pfaff SL

    (2002) Transcriptional codes and the control of neuronal identity

    Annual Review of Neuroscience 25:251–281.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142916

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Sockanathan S
    2. Perlmann T
    3. Jessell TM

    (2003) Retinoid receptor signaling in postmitotic motor neurons regulates rostrocaudal positional identity and axonal projection pattern

    Neuron 40:97–111.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00532-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Stifani N

    (2014) Motor neurons and the generation of spinal motor neuron diversity

    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 8:293.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00293

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Tanabe Y
    2. William C
    3. Jessell TM

    (1998) Specification of motor neuron identity by the MNR2 homeodomain protein

    Cell 95:67–80.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81783-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Taylor SS
    2. Buechler JA
    3. Yonemoto W

    (1990) cAMP-dependent protein kinase: framework for a diverse family of regulatory enzymes

    Annual Review of Biochemistry 59:971–1005.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.004543

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Thaler J
    2. Harrison K
    3. Sharma K
    4. Lettieri K
    5. Kehrl J
    6. Pfaff SL

    (1999) Active suppression of interneuron programs within developing motor neurons revealed by analysis of homeodomain factor HB9

    Neuron 23:675–687.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80027-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Thaler JP
    2. Lee SK
    3. Jurata LW
    4. Gill GN
    5. Pfaff SL

    (2002) LIM factor Lhx3 contributes to the specification of motor neuron and interneuron identity through cell-type-specific protein-protein interactions

    Cell 110:237–249.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00823-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Thiebes KP
    2. Nam H
    3. Cambronne XA
    4. Shen R
    5. Glasgow SM
    6. Cho HH
    7. Kwon JS
    8. Goodman RH
    9. Lee JW
    10. Lee S
    11. Lee SK

    (2015) miR-218 is essential to establish motor neuron fate as a downstream effector of Isl1-Lhx3

    Nature Communications 6:7718.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8718

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Tosney KW
    2. Landmesser LT

    (1985a) Development of the major pathways for neurite outgrowth in the chick hindlimb

    Developmental Biology 109:193–214.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(85)90360-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Tosney KW
    2. Landmesser LT

    (1985b) Growth cone morphology and trajectory in the lumbosacral region of the chick embryo

    The Journal of Neuroscience 5:2345–2358.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-09-02345.1985

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Tsuchida T
    2. Ensini M
    3. Morton SB
    4. Baldassare M
    5. Edlund T
    6. Jessell TM
    7. Pfaff SL

    (1994) Topographic organization of embryonic motor neurons defined by expression of LIM homeobox genes

    Cell 79:957–970.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90027-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Vermot J
    2. Schuhbaur B
    3. Le Mouellic H
    4. McCaffery P
    5. Garnier JM
    6. Hentsch D
    7. Brûlet P
    8. Niederreither K
    9. Chambon P
    10. Dollé P
    11. Le Roux I

    (2005) Retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 and Hoxc8 are required in the murine brachial spinal cord for the specification of Lim1+ motoneurons and the correct distribution of Islet1+ motoneurons

    Development 132:1611–1621.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01718

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Wichterle H
    2. Lieberam I
    3. Porter JA
    4. Jessell TM

    (2002) Directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells into motor neurons

    Cell 110:385–397.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00835-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Wu Y
    2. Wang G
    3. Scott SA
    4. Capecchi MR

    (2008) Hoxc10 and Hoxd10 regulate mouse columnar, divisional and motor pool identity of lumbar motoneurons

    Development 135:171–182.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.009225

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Xue Y
    2. Zhou F
    3. Zhu M
    4. Ahmed K
    5. Chen G
    6. Yao X

    (2005) For phosphorylation sites prediction

    Nucleic Acids Research 33:W184–W187.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki393

    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Yamamoto Y
    2. Henderson CE

    (1999) Patterns of programmed cell death in populations of developing spinal motoneurons in chicken, mouse, and rat

    Developmental Biology 214:60–71.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1999.9413

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Yang L
    2. Cai CL
    3. Lin L
    4. Qyang Y
    5. Chung C
    6. Monteiro RM
    7. Mummery CL
    8. Fishman GI
    9. Cogen A
    10. Evans S

    (2006) Isl1Cre reveals a common Bmp pathway in heart and limb development

    Development 133:1575–1585.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02322

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Yang H
    2. Wang H
    3. Jaenisch R

    (2014) Generating genetically modified mice using CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering

    Nature Protocols 9:1956–1968.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.134

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Yu F
    2. Sugawara T
    3. Maier CM
    4. Hsieh LB
    5. Chan PH

    (2005) Akt/Bad signaling and motor neuron survival after spinal cord injury

    Neurobiology of Disease 20:491–499.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2005.04.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Zhang B
    2. Zhuang T
    3. Lin Q
    4. Yang B
    5. Xu X
    6. Xin G
    7. Zhu S
    8. Wang G
    9. Yu B
    10. Zhang T
    11. Jiang Q
    12. Zhang C

    (2019) Patched1–ArhGAP36–PKA–Inversin axis determines the ciliary translocation of Smoothened for Sonic Hedgehog pathway activation

    PNAS 116:874–879.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804042116

    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Zhong H
    2. SuYang H
    3. Erdjument-Bromage H
    4. Tempst P
    5. Ghosh S

    (1997) The transcriptional activity of NF-kappaB is regulated by the IkappaB-associated PKAc subunit through a cyclic AMP-independent mechanism

    Cell 89:413–424.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80222-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Heejin Nam

   College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing—original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

2. Shin Jeon

   1. College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
   2. Neuroscience Section, Papé Family Pediatric Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science Uiversity, Portland, United States

   Contribution

   Resources, Validation, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Hyejin An

   College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing—review and editing, Generated new images with Shh KD experiment for the revision and counted cell numbers for quantification

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Jaeyoung Yoo

   College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing—review and editing, Generated new images for early stage Arhgap36 KO embryos for the revision and counted cell numbers for quantification

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Hyo-Jong Lee

   College of Pharmacy and Inje Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Inje University, Gyungnam, Republic of Korea

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing—review and editing, Generated new images of Shh-cKO embryos with BrdU incorporation, Ki67, MN columnar marker stainings for the revision and counted cell numbers for quantification

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4826-7954

6. Soo-Kyung Lee

   1. Neuroscience Section, Papé Family Pediatric Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science Uiversity, Portland, United States
   2. Vollum Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1745-256X

7. Seunghee Lee

   College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   leeseung@snu.ac.kr

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5483-0016

• 1,951

  views

• 243

  downloads

• 11

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.