Classical conditioning drives learned reward prediction signals in climbing fibers across the lateral cerebellum
- Duke University School of Medicine, United States
Abstract
Classical models of cerebellar learning posit that climbing fibers operate according to a supervised learning rule to instruct changes in motor output by signaling the occurrence of movement errors. However, cerebellar output is also associated with non-motor behaviors, and recently with modulating reward association pathways in the VTA. To test how the cerebellum processes reward related signals in the same type of classical conditioning behavior typically studied to evaluate reward processing in the VTA and striatum, we have used calcium imaging to visualize instructional signals carried by climbing fibers across the lateral cerebellum in mice before and after learning. We find distinct climbing fiber responses in three lateral cerebellar regions that can each signal reward prediction. These instructional signals are well suited to guide cerebellar learning based on reward expectation and enable a cerebellar contribution to reward driven behaviors, suggesting a broad role for the lateral cerebellum in reward-based learning.
Data availability
Datasets supporting the findings of this study are ~50 GB per experiment, and are therefore available through a request to the corresponding author. Processed data have been provided for each figure, and analysis code has been place in GitHub (https://github.com/Glickfeld-And-Hull-Laboratories/Heffley_Hull_2019_eLife).
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5R01NS096289)
- Court Hull
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F31NS103425)
- William Heffley
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures using animals were carried out with the approval of the Duke University Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #A010-19-01).
Copyright
© 2019, Heffley & Hull
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,129
- views
-
- 806
- downloads
-
- 105
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Classical conditioning drives learned reward prediction signals in climbing fibers across the lateral cerebellum
eLife 8:e46764.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46764
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
New studies examine how the different sub-structures in the cerebellum are organized to receive information during complex behavioral tasks
-
- Neuroscience
Phantom perceptions like tinnitus occur without any identifiable environmental or bodily source. The mechanisms and key drivers behind tinnitus are poorly understood. The dominant framework, suggesting that tinnitus results from neural hyperactivity in the auditory pathway following hearing damage, has been difficult to investigate in humans and has reached explanatory limits. As a result, researchers have tried to explain perceptual and potential neural aberrations in tinnitus within a more parsimonious predictive-coding framework. In two independent magnetoencephalography studies, participants passively listened to sequences of pure tones with varying levels of regularity (i.e. predictability) ranging from random to ordered. Aside from being a replication of the first study, the pre-registered second study, including 80 participants, ensured rigorous matching of hearing status, as well as age, sex, and hearing loss, between individuals with and without tinnitus. Despite some changes in the details of the paradigm, both studies equivalently reveal a group difference in neural representation, based on multivariate pattern analysis, of upcoming stimuli before their onset. These data strongly suggest that individuals with tinnitus engage anticipatory auditory predictions differently to controls. While the observation of different predictive processes is robust and replicable, the precise neurocognitive mechanism underlying it calls for further, ideally longitudinal, studies to establish its role as a potential contributor to, and/or consequence of, tinnitus.
