Modular organization of cerebellar climbing fiber inputs during goal-directed behavior

  1. Shinichiro Tsutsumi  Is a corresponding author
  2. Naoki Hidaka
  3. Yoshikazu Isomura
  4. Masanori Matsuzaki
  5. Kenji Sakimura
  6. Masanobu Kano  Is a corresponding author
  7. Kazuo Kitamura  Is a corresponding author
  1. The University of Tokyo, Japan
  2. Tamagawa University, Japan
  3. Niigata University, Japan
  4. University of Yamanashi, Japan

Abstract

The cerebellum has a parasagittal modular architecture characterized by precisely organized climbing fiber (CF) projections congruent with alternating aldolase C/zebrin II expression. However, behavioral relevance of CF inputs to individual modules remains poorly understood. Here, we used two-photon calcium imaging in the cerebellar hemisphere Crus II in mice performing an auditory go/no-go task to investigate the functional differences in CF inputs to modules. CF signals in medial modules show anticipatory decreases, early increases, secondary increases, and reward-related increases or decreases, which represent quick motor initiation, go cues, fast motor behavior, and positive reward outcomes. CF signals in lateral modules show early increases and reward-related decreases, which represent no-go and/or go cues and positive reward outcomes. The boundaries of CF functions broadly correspond to those of aldolase C patterning. These results indicate that spatially segregated CF inputs in different modules play distinct roles for execution of goal-directed behavior.

Data availability

Data analysed for all the figures are included in the manuscript and source data files. The Aldoc-tdTomato mouse line will be available at RIKEN Bio Resource Center.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shinichiro Tsutsumi

    Department of Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    For correspondence
    stsutsumi@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Naoki Hidaka

    Department of Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yoshikazu Isomura

    Brain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Masanori Matsuzaki

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3872-4322
  5. Kenji Sakimura

    Department of Cellular Neurobiology, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Masanobu Kano

    Department of Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    For correspondence
    mkano-tky@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Kazuo Kitamura

    Department of Neurophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
    For correspondence
    kitamurak@yamanashi.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8956-4122

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23115504)

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25115705)

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25290003)

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H01426)

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H03543)

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H06313)

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21220006)

  • Masanobu Kano

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25000015)

  • Masanobu Kano

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H04012)

  • Masanobu Kano

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (Comprehensive Brain Science Network)

  • Kenji Sakimura
  • Masanobu Kano
  • Kazuo Kitamura

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (Brain Information Dynamics)

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (The Strategic Research Programme for Brain Sciences)

  • Masanobu Kano

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Brain/MINDS)

  • Masanobu Kano
  • Kazuo Kitamura

Takeda Science Foundation

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Uehara Memorial Foundation

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25560432)

  • Kazuo Kitamura

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25113705)

  • Kazuo Kitamura

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were approved by the Animal Experiment Committees of the University of Tokyo (#P08-015) and University of Yamanashi (#A27-1).

Copyright

© 2019, Tsutsumi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,389
    views
  • 512
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shinichiro Tsutsumi
  2. Naoki Hidaka
  3. Yoshikazu Isomura
  4. Masanori Matsuzaki
  5. Kenji Sakimura
  6. Masanobu Kano
  7. Kazuo Kitamura
(2019)
Modular organization of cerebellar climbing fiber inputs during goal-directed behavior
eLife 8:e47021.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47021

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47021

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhujun Shao, Mengya Zhang, Qing Yu
    Research Article

    When holding visual information temporarily in working memory (WM), the neural representation of the memorandum is distributed across various cortical regions, including visual and frontal cortices. However, the role of stimulus representation in visual and frontal cortices during WM has been controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that stimulus representation persists in the frontal cortex to facilitate flexible control demands in WM. During functional MRI, participants flexibly switched between simple WM maintenance of visual stimulus or more complex rule-based categorization of maintained stimulus on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results demonstrated enhanced stimulus representation in the frontal cortex that tracked demands for active WM control and enhanced stimulus representation in the visual cortex that tracked demands for precise WM maintenance. This differential frontal stimulus representation traded off with the newly-generated category representation with varying control demands. Simulation using multi-module recurrent neural networks replicated human neural patterns when stimulus information was preserved for network readout. Altogether, these findings help reconcile the long-standing debate in WM research, and provide empirical and computational evidence that flexible stimulus representation in the frontal cortex during WM serves as a potential neural coding scheme to accommodate the ever-changing environment.

    1. Neuroscience
    Franziska Auer, Katherine Nardone ... David Schoppik
    Research Article

    Cerebellar dysfunction leads to postural instability. Recent work in freely moving rodents has transformed investigations of cerebellar contributions to posture. However, the combined complexity of terrestrial locomotion and the rodent cerebellum motivate new approaches to perturb cerebellar function in simpler vertebrates. Here, we adapted a validated chemogenetic tool (TRPV1/capsaicin) to describe the role of Purkinje cells — the output neurons of the cerebellar cortex — as larval zebrafish swam freely in depth. We achieved both bidirectional control (activation and ablation) of Purkinje cells while performing quantitative high-throughput assessment of posture and locomotion. Activation modified postural control in the pitch (nose-up/nose-down) axis. Similarly, ablations disrupted pitch-axis posture and fin-body coordination responsible for climbs. Postural disruption was more widespread in older larvae, offering a window into emergent roles for the developing cerebellum in the control of posture. Finally, we found that activity in Purkinje cells could individually and collectively encode tilt direction, a key feature of postural control neurons. Our findings delineate an expected role for the cerebellum in postural control and vestibular sensation in larval zebrafish, establishing the validity of TRPV1/capsaicin-mediated perturbations in a simple, genetically tractable vertebrate. Moreover, by comparing the contributions of Purkinje cell ablations to posture in time, we uncover signatures of emerging cerebellar control of posture across early development. This work takes a major step towards understanding an ancestral role of the cerebellum in regulating postural maturation.