1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology

HDX-MS reveals structural determinants for RORγ hyperactivation by synthetic agonists

  1. Timothy S Strutzenberg
  2. Ruben D Garcia-Ordonez
  3. Scott J Novick
  4. HaJeung Park
  5. Mi Ra Chang
  6. Christelle Doebellin
  7. Yuanjun He
  8. Rémi Patouret
  9. Theodore M Kamenecka
  10. Patrick R Griffin  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Scripps Research Institute, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47172
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Timothy S Strutzenberg
  2. Ruben D Garcia-Ordonez
  3. Scott J Novick
  4. HaJeung Park
  5. Mi Ra Chang
  6. Christelle Doebellin
  7. Yuanjun He
  8. Rémi Patouret
  9. Theodore M Kamenecka
  10. Patrick R Griffin
(2019)
HDX-MS reveals structural determinants for RORγ hyperactivation by synthetic agonists
eLife 8:e47172.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47172
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Members of the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily regulate both physiological and pathophysiological processes ranging from development and metabolism to inflammation and cancer. Synthetic small molecules targeting NRs are often deployed as therapeutics to correct aberrant NR signaling or as chemical probes to explore the role of the receptor in physiology. Nearly half of NRs do not have specific cognate ligands (termed orphan NRs) and it's unclear if they possess ligand dependent activities. Here we demonstrate that ligand-dependent action of the orphan RORγ can be defined by selectively disrupting putative endogenous-but not synthetic-ligand binding. Furthermore, the characterization of a library of RORγ modulators reveals that structural dynamics of the receptor assessed by HDX-MS correlate with activity in biochemical and cell-based assays. These findings, corroborated with X-ray co-crystallography and site-directed mutagenesis, collectively reveal the structural determinants of RORγ activation, which is critical for designing RORγ agonists for cancer immunotherapy.

Data availability

Due to their large size, all the raw data from MS analysis is available from the authors. HDX Workbench outputs files have been uploaded to figshare (10.6084/m9.figshare.8230685) along with a treated data summary which summarizes the findings from the raw data.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Timothy S Strutzenberg

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0598-534X

  2. Ruben D Garcia-Ordonez

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Scott J Novick

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. HaJeung Park

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Mi Ra Chang

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Christelle Doebellin

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Yuanjun He

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Rémi Patouret

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Theodore M Kamenecka

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Patrick R Griffin

    Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    For correspondence
    pgriffin@scripps.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3404-690X

Funding

National Cancer Institute

  • Patrick R Griffin

National Institute of General Medical Sciences

  • Timothy S Strutzenberg

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Peter Tontonoz, University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Version history

  1. Received: March 27, 2019
  2. Accepted: June 1, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 7, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 17, 2019 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: October 18, 2019 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2019, Strutzenberg et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,606
    views
  • 364
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Timothy S Strutzenberg
  2. Ruben D Garcia-Ordonez
  3. Scott J Novick
  4. HaJeung Park
  5. Mi Ra Chang
  6. Christelle Doebellin
  7. Yuanjun He
  8. Rémi Patouret
  9. Theodore M Kamenecka
  10. Patrick R Griffin
(2019)
HDX-MS reveals structural determinants for RORγ hyperactivation by synthetic agonists
eLife 8:e47172.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47172

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47172

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology

    Allosteric activation of the co-receptor BAK1 by the EFR receptor kinase initiates immune signaling

    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Alzheimer’s disease linked Aβ42 exerts product feedback inhibition on γ-secretase impairing downstream cell signaling

    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.