The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel is required for bone formation

Abstract

Mechanical load of the skeleton system is essential for the development, growth, and maintenance of bone. However, the molecular mechanism by which mechanical stimuli are converted into osteogenesis and bone formation remains unclear. Here we report that Piezo1, a bona fide mechanotransducer critical for various biological processes, plays a critical role in bone formation. Knockout of Piezo1 in osteoblast lineage cells disrupts osteogenesis of osteoblasts and severely impairs bone structure and strength. Mechanical unloading induced bone loss is blunted in the Piezo1 knockout mice. Intriguingly, simulated microgravity treatment reduced the function of osteoblasts via suppressing the expression of Piezo1. Furthermore, osteoporosis patients show reduced expression of Piezo1, which is closely correlated with osteoblast dysfunction. These data collectively suggest that Piezo1 functions as a key mechanotransducer for conferring mechanosensitivity to osteoblasts and determining mechanical-load-dependent bone formation, and represents a novel therapeutic target for treating osteoporosis or mechanical unloading-induced severe bone loss.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Weijia Sun

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Shaopeng Chi

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yuheng Li

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shukuan Ling

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yingjun Tan

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Youjia Xu

    The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fan Jiang

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jianwei Li

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Caizhi Liu

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Guohui Zhong

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Dengchao Cao

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Xiaoyan Jin

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Dingsheng Zhao

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Xingcheng Gao

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Zizhong Liu

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Bailong Xiao

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    xbailong@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Yingxian Li

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    yingxianli@aliyun.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5440-3281

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31630038)

  • Yingxian Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81822026)

  • Shukuan Ling

National Natural Science Foundation of China (91740114)

  • Yingxian Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81830061)

  • Yingxian Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700741)

  • Yuheng Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31825014)

  • Bailong Xiao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31630090)

  • Bailong Xiao

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFA0500402)

  • Bailong Xiao

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2015CB910102)

  • Bailong Xiao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31800994)

  • Weijia Sun

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal studies were performed according to approved guidelines for the use and care of live animals (Guideline on Administration of Laboratory Animals released in1988 and 2006 Guideline on Humane Treatment of Laboratory Animals from China). All the experimental procedures were approved by the Committees of Animal Ethics and Experimental Safety of China Astronaut Research and Training Center (Reference number: ACC-IACUC-2017-003).

Human subjects: The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. All the clinical procedures were approved by the Committees of Clinical Ethics in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Reference number: 2016-K-22).

Copyright

© 2019, Sun et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,390
    views
  • 1,909
    downloads
  • 278
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Weijia Sun
  2. Shaopeng Chi
  3. Yuheng Li
  4. Shukuan Ling
  5. Yingjun Tan
  6. Youjia Xu
  7. Fan Jiang
  8. Jianwei Li
  9. Caizhi Liu
  10. Guohui Zhong
  11. Dengchao Cao
  12. Xiaoyan Jin
  13. Dingsheng Zhao
  14. Xingcheng Gao
  15. Zizhong Liu
  16. Bailong Xiao
  17. Yingxian Li
(2019)
The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel is required for bone formation
eLife 8:e47454.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47454

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47454

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Naoki Yamawaki, Hande Login ... Asami Tanimura
    Research Article

    The claustrum complex is viewed as fundamental for higher-order cognition; however, the circuit organization and function of its neuroanatomical subregions are not well understood. We demonstrated that some of the key roles of the CLA complex can be attributed to the connectivity and function of a small group of neurons in its ventral subregion, the endopiriform (EN). We identified a subpopulation of EN neurons by their projection to the ventral CA1 (ENvCA1-proj. neurons), embedded in recurrent circuits with other EN neurons and the piriform cortex. Although the ENvCA1-proj. neuron activity was biased toward novelty across stimulus categories, their chemogenetic inhibition selectively disrupted the memory-guided but not innate responses of mice to novelty. Based on our functional connectivity analysis, we suggest that ENvCA1-proj. neurons serve as an essential node for recognition memory through recurrent circuits mediating sustained attention to novelty, and through feed-forward inhibition of distal vCA1 neurons shifting memory-guided behavior from familiarity to novelty.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Sarah De Beuckeleer, Tim Van De Looverbosch ... Winnok H De Vos
    Research Article

    Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology is revolutionizing cell biology. However, the variability between individual iPSC lines and the lack of efficient technology to comprehensively characterize iPSC-derived cell types hinder its adoption in routine preclinical screening settings. To facilitate the validation of iPSC-derived cell culture composition, we have implemented an imaging assay based on cell painting and convolutional neural networks to recognize cell types in dense and mixed cultures with high fidelity. We have benchmarked our approach using pure and mixed cultures of neuroblastoma and astrocytoma cell lines and attained a classification accuracy above 96%. Through iterative data erosion, we found that inputs containing the nuclear region of interest and its close environment, allow achieving equally high classification accuracy as inputs containing the whole cell for semi-confluent cultures and preserved prediction accuracy even in very dense cultures. We then applied this regionally restricted cell profiling approach to evaluate the differentiation status of iPSC-derived neural cultures, by determining the ratio of postmitotic neurons and neural progenitors. We found that the cell-based prediction significantly outperformed an approach in which the population-level time in culture was used as a classification criterion (96% vs 86%, respectively). In mixed iPSC-derived neuronal cultures, microglia could be unequivocally discriminated from neurons, regardless of their reactivity state, and a tiered strategy allowed for further distinguishing activated from non-activated cell states, albeit with lower accuracy. Thus, morphological single-cell profiling provides a means to quantify cell composition in complex mixed neural cultures and holds promise for use in the quality control of iPSC-derived cell culture models.