The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel is required for bone formation

Abstract

Mechanical load of the skeleton system is essential for the development, growth, and maintenance of bone. However, the molecular mechanism by which mechanical stimuli are converted into osteogenesis and bone formation remains unclear. Here we report that Piezo1, a bona fide mechanotransducer critical for various biological processes, plays a critical role in bone formation. Knockout of Piezo1 in osteoblast lineage cells disrupts osteogenesis of osteoblasts and severely impairs bone structure and strength. Mechanical unloading induced bone loss is blunted in the Piezo1 knockout mice. Intriguingly, simulated microgravity treatment reduced the function of osteoblasts via suppressing the expression of Piezo1. Furthermore, osteoporosis patients show reduced expression of Piezo1, which is closely correlated with osteoblast dysfunction. These data collectively suggest that Piezo1 functions as a key mechanotransducer for conferring mechanosensitivity to osteoblasts and determining mechanical-load-dependent bone formation, and represents a novel therapeutic target for treating osteoporosis or mechanical unloading-induced severe bone loss.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Weijia Sun

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Shaopeng Chi

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yuheng Li

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shukuan Ling

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yingjun Tan

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Youjia Xu

    The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fan Jiang

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jianwei Li

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Caizhi Liu

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Guohui Zhong

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Dengchao Cao

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Xiaoyan Jin

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Dingsheng Zhao

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Xingcheng Gao

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Zizhong Liu

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Bailong Xiao

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    xbailong@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Yingxian Li

    State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    yingxianli@aliyun.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5440-3281

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31630038)

  • Yingxian Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81822026)

  • Shukuan Ling

National Natural Science Foundation of China (91740114)

  • Yingxian Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81830061)

  • Yingxian Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700741)

  • Yuheng Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31825014)

  • Bailong Xiao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31630090)

  • Bailong Xiao

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFA0500402)

  • Bailong Xiao

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2015CB910102)

  • Bailong Xiao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31800994)

  • Weijia Sun

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Clifford J Rosen, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal studies were performed according to approved guidelines for the use and care of live animals (Guideline on Administration of Laboratory Animals released in1988 and 2006 Guideline on Humane Treatment of Laboratory Animals from China). All the experimental procedures were approved by the Committees of Animal Ethics and Experimental Safety of China Astronaut Research and Training Center (Reference number: ACC-IACUC-2017-003).

Human subjects: The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. All the clinical procedures were approved by the Committees of Clinical Ethics in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Reference number: 2016-K-22).

Version history

  1. Received: April 5, 2019
  2. Accepted: July 6, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 10, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 7, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Sun et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,643
    views
  • 1,789
    downloads
  • 228
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Weijia Sun
  2. Shaopeng Chi
  3. Yuheng Li
  4. Shukuan Ling
  5. Yingjun Tan
  6. Youjia Xu
  7. Fan Jiang
  8. Jianwei Li
  9. Caizhi Liu
  10. Guohui Zhong
  11. Dengchao Cao
  12. Xiaoyan Jin
  13. Dingsheng Zhao
  14. Xingcheng Gao
  15. Zizhong Liu
  16. Bailong Xiao
  17. Yingxian Li
(2019)
The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel is required for bone formation
eLife 8:e47454.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47454

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47454

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article Updated

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven cell motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high-MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    Yoko Nakai-Futatsugi, Jianshi Jin ... Masayo Takahashi
    Research Article

    Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells show heterogeneous levels of pigmentation when cultured in vitro. To know whether their color in appearance is correlated with the function of the RPE, we analyzed the color intensities of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived RPE cells (iPSC-RPE) together with the gene expression profile at the single-cell level. For this purpose, we utilized our recent invention, Automated Live imaging and cell Picking System (ALPS), which enabled photographing each cell before RNA-sequencing analysis to profile the gene expression of each cell. While our iPSC-RPE were categorized into four clusters by gene expression, the color intensity of iPSC-RPE did not project any specific gene expression profiles. We reasoned this by less correlation between the actual color and the gene expressions that directly define the level of pigmentation, from which we hypothesized the color of RPE cells may be a temporal condition not strongly indicating the functional characteristics of the RPE.