1. Ecology
  2. Evolutionary Biology
Download icon

Ecology: Keeping it fresh

  1. Jonathan L Klassen  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Connecticut, United States
  • Cited 0
  • Views 799
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e48268 doi: 10.7554/eLife.48268


Beewolf wasp eggs release nitrogen oxides to provide protection against fungi and other microbes.

Main text

Beewolves, a type of wasp that preys on bees, provide for their offspring by laying eggs on paralyzed honeybees. Each egg is laid on its own honeybee in what is known as a ‘brood cell’, which is then sealed inside a waterproof coating, buried underground and left to fend for itself. When the egg hatches the beewolf larva can use the paralyzed honeybee as a source of food for up to two weeks. A challenge for the beewolf is to keep the paralyzed honeybee ‘fresh’ until it is needed: this means that they have to prevent the honeybee from being overrun by bacteria and fungi.

Previous studies have identified two possible solutions to this challenge. First, beewolves create a low humidity environment that is unfavorable for fungal growth by secreting a waterproof coating around each paralyzed honeybee (Herzner and Strohm, 2007). Second, beewolves host a specific type of bacterium, known as ‘Candidatus Streptomyces philanthi’, in specialized glands on their antennae (Kaltenpoth et al., 2005). Before laying each egg, a beewolf smears secretions containing this bacterium onto the roof of each brood cell. Then, six to eight days after hatching, the beewolf larva spins a cocoon around the honeybee, incorporating the bacterium from this secretion into the cocoon’s threads. The ‘Cand. S. philanthi’ within the cocoon then produce several antibiotics that prevent it from becoming contaminated with fungi (Kroiss et al., 2010).

However, experimentally replicating these two mechanisms did not protect the buried honeybees to the same extent as observed in nature (Strohm and Linsenmair, 2001), indicating that there may be at least one other mechanism at work. Now, in eLife, Erhard Strohm, Gudrun Herzner, Joachim Ruther, Martin Kaltenpoth and Tobias Engl (who are based at the University of Regensburg and the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology) report their discovery of this missing mechanism (Figure 1; Strohm et al., 2019).

Beewolf eggs emit nitrogen oxides to protect against fungal contamination.

When a beewolf wasp lays an egg on a paralyzed honeybee, the egg produces volatile nitrogen oxides (blue gas) that prevent the honeybee from being contaminated by fungi, thus allowing the beewolf larva to feed on it (Left). Without such protection, the honeybee quickly becomes overgrown by fungi (Right). Image credit: Virge Kask (CC BY 4.0).

Based on the simple observation that beewolf eggs, but not larvae, had a distinctive chlorine-like smell, Strohm et al. predicted that these eggs were producing a similarly volatile chemical. Subsequent analysis revealed that the eggs were releasing nitric oxide, which can spontaneously react with oxygen to produce the odorous gas nitrogen dioxide. In the insect world nitric oxide is widely used as a signaling molecule, usually at low concentrations (Müller, 1997), and some insects produce high levels of nitric oxide as part of an immune response to microbial infection (Rivero, 2006). At such high levels, nitrogen oxides (nitric oxide and its oxidation product nitrogen dioxide) are toxic to a wide range of organisms, and so are well suited to providing protection against the microbes found in soil.

Strohm et al. found that production of nitrogen oxides peaked 14 hours after a beewolf egg had been laid, which should allow high concentrations of these gases to be maintained in the brood cell throughout larval development. They also showed that nitrogen oxides by themselves strongly inhibited the growth of several different species of mold fungi, as did the nitrogen oxides released by the eggs. However, a combination of cocoon spinning and nitrogen oxide production was needed to reduce fungal contamination to the levels observed in the brood cells of wild beewolves.

Having clearly established its antifungal role, Strohm et al. went on to investigate how these exceptional levels of nitrogen oxides are produced. Sequencing revealed that the gene for NOS (the enzyme that synthesizes nitric oxide) in beewolves was highly similar to those found in other related species. However, differences in splicing (the process that removes the non-coding parts of genes following transcription) caused this enzyme to have a variant form of mRNA that Strohm et al. hypothesized could be responsible for the higher production of nitric oxide in beewolf eggs. If this is the case, however, it remains unclear how this splice variant carries out the other roles that NOS normally performs, such as signaling during development. In addition, it is unclear how the beewolf larvae, and their ‘Cand. S. philanthi’ symbionts, protect themselves from toxic nitrogen oxides. It may be that each antifungal mechanism is tuned to maximize overall antifungal activity throughout larval development while minimizing collateral damage to the developing beewolf itself.

Strohm et al. have added important new details to our understanding of how beewolves defend their prey within brood cells. It will be interesting to test if volatile compounds are involved in antifungal defense mechanisms in other systems, in addition to known mechanisms such as antibiotic production. Nitric oxide, and other compounds produced from the metabolism of nitrate, have long been used to prevent microbial contamination of human food (Cammack et al., 1999). Therefore, studies of brood-caring insects such as beewolves could potentially inspire new and more effective preservation strategies for use during human food production.


Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jonathan L Klassen

    Jonathan L Klassen is in the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States

    For correspondence
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1745-8838

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: June 12, 2019 (version 1)


© 2019, Klassen

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.


  • 799
    Page views
  • 56
  • 0

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

  1. How do wasp eggs preserve the food they will eat when they hatch?

    1. Ecology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Matt Lloyd Jones et al.
    Research Article

    Common garden experiments that inoculate a standardised growth medium with synthetic microbial communities (i.e. constructed from individual isolates or using dilution cultures) suggest that the ability of the community to resist invasions by additional microbial taxa can be predicted by the overall community productivity (broadly defined as cumulative cell density and/or growth rate). However, to the best of our knowledge, no common garden study has yet investigated the relationship between microbial community composition and invasion resistance in microcosms whose compositional differences reflect natural, rather than laboratory-designed, variation. We conducted experimental invasions of two bacterial strains (Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida) into laboratory microcosms inoculated with 680 different mixtures of bacteria derived from naturally occurring microbial communities collected in the field. Using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to characterise microcosm starting composition, and high-throughput assays of community phenotypes including productivity and invader survival, we determined that productivity is a key predictor of invasion resistance in natural microbial communities, substantially mediating the effect of composition on invasion resistance. The results suggest that similar general principles govern invasion in artificial and natural communities, and that factors affecting resident community productivity should be a focal point for future microbial invasion experiments.