Accelerated viral dynamics in bat cell lines, with implications for zoonotic emergence

  1. Cara E Brook  Is a corresponding author
  2. Mike Boots
  3. Kartik Chandran
  4. Andrew P Dobson
  5. Christian Drosten
  6. Andrea L Graham
  7. Bryan T Grenfell
  8. Marcel A Müller
  9. Melinda Ng
  10. Lin-Fa Wang
  11. Anieke van Leeuwen
  1. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  2. Albert Einstein College Of Medicine, United States
  3. Princeton University, United States
  4. Charité Universitätsmedizin, Germany
  5. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  6. Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
  7. Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Netherlands

Abstract

Bats host virulent zoonotic viruses without experiencing disease. A mechanistic understanding of the impact of bats' virus hosting capacities, including uniquely constitutive immune pathways, on cellular-scale viral dynamics is needed to elucidate zoonotic emergence. We carried out virus infectivity assays on bat cell lines expressing induced and constitutive immune phenotypes, then developed a theoretical model of our in vitro system, which we fit to empirical data. Best fit models recapitulated expected immune phenotypes for representative cell lines, supporting robust antiviral defenses in bat cells that correlated with higher estimates for within-host viral propagation rates. In general, heightened immune responses limit pathogen-induced cellular morbidity, which can facilitate the establishment of rapidly-propagating persistent infections within-host. Rapidly-replicating viruses that have evolved with bat immune systems will likely cause enhanced virulence following emergence into secondary hosts with immune systems that diverge from those unique to bats.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. All images and code used in this study have been made available for download at the following Figshare repository: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8312807.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Cara E Brook

    Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    cbrook@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4276-073X
  2. Mike Boots

    Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kartik Chandran

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College Of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0232-7077
  4. Andrew P Dobson

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christian Drosten

    Institute of Virology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrea L Graham

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6580-2755
  7. Bryan T Grenfell

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Marcel A Müller

    Institute of Virology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2242-5117
  9. Melinda Ng

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Lin-Fa Wang

    Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2752-0535
  11. Anieke van Leeuwen

    Department of Coastal Systems, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1987-1458

Funding

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)

  • Cara E Brook

Adolph C. and Mary Sprague Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California Berkeley (Postdoctoral Fellowship)

  • Cara E Brook

National Institutes of Health (R01-AI134824)

  • Kartik Chandran

Singapore National Research Foundation Grant (NRF2012NRF-CRP001-056)

  • Lin-Fa Wang

Singapore National Research Foundation Grant (NRF2016NRF-NSFC002-013)

  • Lin-Fa Wang

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DR 772/10-2)

  • Marcel A Müller

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (RAPID #01KI1723A)

  • Marcel A Müller

European Union Horizon Grant 2020 (#653316)

  • Marcel A Müller

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Brook et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 35,721
    views
  • 3,812
    downloads
  • 89
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Cara E Brook
  2. Mike Boots
  3. Kartik Chandran
  4. Andrew P Dobson
  5. Christian Drosten
  6. Andrea L Graham
  7. Bryan T Grenfell
  8. Marcel A Müller
  9. Melinda Ng
  10. Lin-Fa Wang
  11. Anieke van Leeuwen
(2020)
Accelerated viral dynamics in bat cell lines, with implications for zoonotic emergence
eLife 9:e48401.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48401

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48401

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Mathilde Delacoux, Fumihiro Kano
    Research Article

    During collective vigilance, it is commonly assumed that individual animals compromise their feeding time to be vigilant against predators, benefiting the entire group. One notable issue with this assumption concerns the unclear nature of predator ‘detection’, particularly in terms of vision. It remains uncertain how a vigilant individual utilizes its high-acuity vision (such as the fovea) to detect a predator cue and subsequently guide individual and collective escape responses. Using fine-scale motion-capture technologies, we tracked the head and body orientations of pigeons (hence reconstructed their visual fields and foveal projections) foraging in a flock during simulated predator attacks. Pigeons used their fovea to inspect predator cues. Earlier foveation on a predator cue was linked to preceding behaviors related to vigilance and feeding, such as head-up or down positions, head-scanning, and food-pecking. Moreover, earlier foveation predicted earlier evasion flights at both the individual and collective levels. However, we also found that relatively long delay between their foveation and escape responses in individuals obscured the relationship between these two responses. While our results largely support the existing assumptions about vigilance, they also underscore the importance of considering vision and addressing the disparity between detection and escape responses in future research.

    1. Ecology
    Elham Nourani, Louise Faure ... Kamran Safi
    Research Article

    The heterogeneity of the physical environment determines the cost of transport for animals, shaping their energy landscape. Animals respond to this energy landscape by adjusting their distribution and movement to maximize gains and reduce costs. Much of our knowledge about energy landscape dynamics focuses on factors external to the animal, particularly the spatio-temporal variations of the environment. However, an animal’s internal state can significantly impact its ability to perceive and utilize available energy, creating a distinction between the ‘fundamental’ and the ‘realized’ energy landscapes. Here, we show that the realized energy landscape varies along the ontogenetic axis. Locomotor and cognitive capabilities of individuals change over time, especially during the early life stages. We investigate the development of the realized energy landscape in the Central European Alpine population of the golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos, a large predator that requires negotiating the atmospheric environment to achieve energy-efficient soaring flight. We quantified weekly energy landscapes using environmental features for 55 juvenile golden eagles, demonstrating that energetic costs of traversing the landscape decreased with age. Consequently, the potentially flyable area within the Alpine region increased 2170-fold during their first three years of independence. Our work contributes to a predictive understanding of animal movement by presenting ontogeny as a mechanism shaping the realized energy landscape.