Accelerated viral dynamics in bat cell lines, with implications for zoonotic emergence

  1. Cara E Brook  Is a corresponding author
  2. Mike Boots
  3. Kartik Chandran
  4. Andrew P Dobson
  5. Christian Drosten
  6. Andrea L Graham
  7. Bryan T Grenfell
  8. Marcel A Müller
  9. Melinda Ng
  10. Lin-Fa Wang
  11. Anieke van Leeuwen
  1. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  2. Albert Einstein College Of Medicine, United States
  3. Princeton University, United States
  4. Charité Universitätsmedizin, Germany
  5. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  6. Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
  7. Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Netherlands

Abstract

Bats host virulent zoonotic viruses without experiencing disease. A mechanistic understanding of the impact of bats' virus hosting capacities, including uniquely constitutive immune pathways, on cellular-scale viral dynamics is needed to elucidate zoonotic emergence. We carried out virus infectivity assays on bat cell lines expressing induced and constitutive immune phenotypes, then developed a theoretical model of our in vitro system, which we fit to empirical data. Best fit models recapitulated expected immune phenotypes for representative cell lines, supporting robust antiviral defenses in bat cells that correlated with higher estimates for within-host viral propagation rates. In general, heightened immune responses limit pathogen-induced cellular morbidity, which can facilitate the establishment of rapidly-propagating persistent infections within-host. Rapidly-replicating viruses that have evolved with bat immune systems will likely cause enhanced virulence following emergence into secondary hosts with immune systems that diverge from those unique to bats.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. All images and code used in this study have been made available for download at the following Figshare repository: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8312807.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Cara E Brook

    Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    cbrook@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4276-073X
  2. Mike Boots

    Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kartik Chandran

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College Of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0232-7077
  4. Andrew P Dobson

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christian Drosten

    Institute of Virology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrea L Graham

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6580-2755
  7. Bryan T Grenfell

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Marcel A Müller

    Institute of Virology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2242-5117
  9. Melinda Ng

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Lin-Fa Wang

    Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2752-0535
  11. Anieke van Leeuwen

    Department of Coastal Systems, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1987-1458

Funding

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)

  • Cara E Brook

Adolph C. and Mary Sprague Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California Berkeley (Postdoctoral Fellowship)

  • Cara E Brook

National Institutes of Health (R01-AI134824)

  • Kartik Chandran

Singapore National Research Foundation Grant (NRF2012NRF-CRP001-056)

  • Lin-Fa Wang

Singapore National Research Foundation Grant (NRF2016NRF-NSFC002-013)

  • Lin-Fa Wang

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DR 772/10-2)

  • Marcel A Müller

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (RAPID #01KI1723A)

  • Marcel A Müller

European Union Horizon Grant 2020 (#653316)

  • Marcel A Müller

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Brook et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 35,914
    views
  • 3,835
    downloads
  • 93
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Cara E Brook
  2. Mike Boots
  3. Kartik Chandran
  4. Andrew P Dobson
  5. Christian Drosten
  6. Andrea L Graham
  7. Bryan T Grenfell
  8. Marcel A Müller
  9. Melinda Ng
  10. Lin-Fa Wang
  11. Anieke van Leeuwen
(2020)
Accelerated viral dynamics in bat cell lines, with implications for zoonotic emergence
eLife 9:e48401.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48401

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48401

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Rebecca D Tarvin, Jeffrey L Coleman ... Richard W Fitch
    Research Article

    Understanding the origins of novel, complex phenotypes is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Poison frogs of the family Dendrobatidae have evolved the novel ability to acquire alkaloids from their diet for chemical defense at least three times. However, taxon sampling for alkaloids has been biased towards colorful species, without similar attention paid to inconspicuous ones that are often assumed to be undefended. As a result, our understanding of how chemical defense evolved in this group is incomplete. Here, we provide new data showing that, in contrast to previous studies, species from each undefended poison frog clade have measurable yet low amounts of alkaloids. We confirm that undefended dendrobatids regularly consume mites and ants, which are known sources of alkaloids. Thus, our data suggest that diet is insufficient to explain the defended phenotype. Our data support the existence of a phenotypic intermediate between toxin consumption and sequestration — passive accumulation — that differs from sequestration in that it involves no derived forms of transport and storage mechanisms yet results in low levels of toxin accumulation. We discuss the concept of passive accumulation and its potential role in the origin of chemical defenses in poison frogs and other toxin-sequestering organisms. In light of ideas from pharmacokinetics, we incorporate new and old data from poison frogs into an evolutionary model that could help explain the origins of acquired chemical defenses in animals and provide insight into the molecular processes that govern the fate of ingested toxins.

    1. Ecology
    Mercury Shitindo
    Insight

    Tracking wild pigs with GPS devices reveals how their social interactions could influence the spread of disease, offering new strategies for protecting agriculture, wildlife, and human health.