MRGPRX4 is a bile acid receptor for human cholestatic itch

  1. Huasheng Yu
  2. Tianjun Zhao
  3. Simin Liu
  4. Qinxue Wu
  5. Omar Johnson
  6. Zhaofa Wu
  7. Zihao Zhuang
  8. Yaocheng Shi
  9. Luxin Peng
  10. Renxi He
  11. Yong Yang
  12. Jianjun Sun
  13. Xiaoqun Wang
  14. Haifeng Xu
  15. Zheng Zeng
  16. Peng Zou
  17. Xiaoguang Lei
  18. Wenqin Luo  Is a corresponding author
  19. Yulong Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. Peking University School of Life Sciences, China
  2. University of Pennsylvania, United States
  3. Peking University, China
  4. Peking University First Hospital, China
  5. Peking University Third Hospital, China
  6. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  7. Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China
  8. Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, China

Abstract

Patients with liver diseases often suffer from chronic itch, yet the pruritogen(s) and receptor(s) remain largely elusive. Here, we identify bile acids as natural ligands for MRGPRX4. MRGPRX4 is expressed in human dorsal root ganglion (hDRG) neurons and co-expresses with itch receptor HRH1. Bile acids elicited Ca2+ responses in cultured hDRG neurons, and bile acids or a MRGPRX4 specific agonist induced itch in human subjects. However, a specific agonist for another bile acid receptor TGR5 failed to induce itch in human subjects and we find that human TGR5 is not expressed in hDRG neurons. Finally, we show positive correlation between cholestatic itch and plasma bile acids level in itchy patients and the elevated bile acids is sufficient to activate MRGPRX4. Taken together, our data strongly suggest that MRGPRX4 is a novel bile acid receptor that likely underlies cholestatic itch in human, providing a promising new drug target for anti-itch therapies.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Huasheng Yu

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5641-2512
  2. Tianjun Zhao

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Simin Liu

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Qinxue Wu

    Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Omar Johnson

    Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Zhaofa Wu

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Zihao Zhuang

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yaocheng Shi

    Department of Chemical Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Luxin Peng

    Department of Chemical Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Renxi He

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Yong Yang

    Department of Dermatology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jianjun Sun

    Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Xiaoqun Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology (Shanghai), Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Haifeng Xu

    Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Zheng Zeng

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Peng Zou

    Department of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9798-5242
  17. Xiaoguang Lei

    Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Wenqin Luo

    Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    luow@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2486-807X
  19. Yulong Li

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    yulongli@pku.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9166-9919

Funding

Department of the Central Committee of the CPC (Junior Thousand Talents Program of China)

  • Yulong Li

Chinese Institute for Brain Research (Z181100001518004)

  • Yulong Li

University of Pennsylvania (Internal funding)

  • Wenqin Luo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All experiments involving human subjects have been approved by institutional review board or ethics committee and the informed consent, and consent to publish, was obtained. Collection of DRG tissue from adult humans was approved by the Committee for Medical Science Research Ethics, Peking University Third Hospital (IRB00006761-2015238), and collection from human embryos was approved by the Reproductive Study Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (2012SZ-013 and 2017SZ-043) and Beijing Anzhen Hospital (2014012x). The human itch test studies were approved by the Committee for Protecting Human and Animal Subjects at the Department of Psychology, Peking University (#2018-05-02). Collection of blood samples from patients were approved by the Committee for Biomedical Ethics, Peking University First Hospital (2017-R-94).

Copyright

© 2019, Yu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,285
    views
  • 1,271
    downloads
  • 105
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Huasheng Yu
  2. Tianjun Zhao
  3. Simin Liu
  4. Qinxue Wu
  5. Omar Johnson
  6. Zhaofa Wu
  7. Zihao Zhuang
  8. Yaocheng Shi
  9. Luxin Peng
  10. Renxi He
  11. Yong Yang
  12. Jianjun Sun
  13. Xiaoqun Wang
  14. Haifeng Xu
  15. Zheng Zeng
  16. Peng Zou
  17. Xiaoguang Lei
  18. Wenqin Luo
  19. Yulong Li
(2019)
MRGPRX4 is a bile acid receptor for human cholestatic itch
eLife 8:e48431.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48431

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48431

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Philipp S O'Neill, Martín Baccino-Calace ... Igor Delvendahl
    Tools and Resources

    Quantitative information about synaptic transmission is key to our understanding of neural function. Spontaneously occurring synaptic events carry fundamental information about synaptic function and plasticity. However, their stochastic nature and low signal-to-noise ratio present major challenges for the reliable and consistent analysis. Here, we introduce miniML, a supervised deep learning-based method for accurate classification and automated detection of spontaneous synaptic events. Comparative analysis using simulated ground-truth data shows that miniML outperforms existing event analysis methods in terms of both precision and recall. miniML enables precise detection and quantification of synaptic events in electrophysiological recordings. We demonstrate that the deep learning approach generalizes easily to diverse synaptic preparations, different electrophysiological and optical recording techniques, and across animal species. miniML provides not only a comprehensive and robust framework for automated, reliable, and standardized analysis of synaptic events, but also opens new avenues for high-throughput investigations of neural function and dysfunction.

    1. Neuroscience
    Kentaro K Ishii, Koichi Hashikawa ... Garret D Stuber
    Research Article

    Male ejaculation acutely suppresses sexual motivation in male mice. In contrast, relatively little is known about how male ejaculation affects sexual motivation and sexual behavior in female mice. How the brain responds to the completion of mating is also unclear. Here, by using a self-paced mating assay, we first demonstrate that female mice show decreased sexual motivation acutely after experiencing male ejaculation. By using brain-wide analysis of activity-dependent labeling, we next pin-pointed the medial preoptic area as a brain region strongly activated during the post-ejaculatory period. Furthermore, using freely moving in vivo calcium imaging to compare the neural activity of inhibitory and excitatory neurons in the medial preoptic area, we revealed that a subset of the neurons in this region responds significantly and specifically to male ejaculation but not to female-to-male sniffing or to male mounting. While there were excitatory and inhibitory neurons that showed increased response to male ejaculation, the response magnitude as well as the proportion of neurons responding to the event was significantly larger in the inhibitory neuron population. Next, by unbiased classification of their responses, we also found a subpopulation of neurons that increase their activity late after the onset of male ejaculation. These neurons were all inhibitory indicating that male ejaculation induces a prolonged inhibitory activity in the medial preoptic area. Lastly, we found that chemogenetic activation of medial preoptic area neurons that were active during the post-ejaculatory period, but not during appetitive or consummatory periods, were sufficient to suppress female sexual motivation. Together, our data illuminate the importance of the medial preoptic area as a brain node which encodes a negative signal that sustains a low sexual motivation state after the female mice experience ejaculation.