Bacteria: How Legionella defend their turf

Communities of bacteria that cause Legionnaire’s disease repel other bacteria by secreting an acid called HGA.
  1. Elisa D Hughes
  2. Michele S Swanson  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan Medical School, United States

Legionella pneumophila is a water-borne bacterium that takes up residence in engineered water systems, and if inhaled by susceptible people, it can cause a severe form of pneumonia known as Legionnaires’ disease. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, L. pneumophila infections are on the rise and are now the leading cause of water-associated illness in the United States. However, a major problem is that decontamination methods often fail to eradicate every single bacterium, which allows populations of bacteria to build up again (Cervero-Aragó et al., 2015; Berjeaud et al., 2016).

One way that Legionella manages to persist in the environment is by associating with biofilms – microbial communities that attach to surfaces and encase themselves in a protective matrix (Abu Khweek and Amer, 2018). The microbes in these communities engage in behaviors that mutually benefit each other, such as forming food chains or making up the sugar chains of the biofilm’s protective shield (Elias and Banin, 2012). Inhabitants of the biofilm must also repel other microbes that are unlikely to contribute to the community (Drescher et al., 2014; Özkaya et al., 2017). However, despite these biofilms being a threatening pool of infectious bacteria, little is known about how L. pneumophila socially behave. Now, in eLife, Tera Levin, Brian Goldspiel and Harmit Malik from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center report how highly dense populations of L. pneumophila can inhibit the growth of other bacteria belonging to the same or related species of Legionella (Levin et al., 2019).

Levin et al. found that L. pneumophila secrete a molecule called homogenetisic acid, or HGA for short, which is produced by the amino acids tyrosine and phenylalanine as they convert into more complex molecules. Legionella primarily secretes HGA after the bacteria have stopped replicating, during a period known as the stationary phase. Once secreted, HGA combines with oxygen and self-assembles into long chains to form a dark brown pigment. This pigment, called pyomelanin, is known to protect Legionella against light damage and to help them acquire iron, which is an essential micronutrient (Steinert et al., 1995; Zheng et al., 2013). Levin et al. show that HGA also has toxic properties that can defend Legionella communities from invading microbes.

These properties became evident when the researchers discovered that L. pneumophila mutants that fail to inhibit the growth of other Legionella bacteria did not produce HGA. Interestingly, secreted HGA is only toxic if oxygen is present in the environment, and Levin et al. argue that a reactive intermediate formed during the conversion of HGA to pyomelanin likely accounts for its inhibitory properties. HGA is also detoxified by reducing agents, including the amino acid cysteine, which must be present for L. pneumophila to grow in laboratory cultures.

One conundrum is how L. pneumophila avoids the toxic effects of HGA. As secretion of the inhibitor increases when the bacteria are in the stationary phase – a state typically associated with high bacterial density – Levin et al. speculated that genes involved in either quorum sensing (which leads to changes in gene regulation based on population density) or the stringent stress response may promote resistance to HGA. However, deleting known genes in each of these widespread cell-signaling pathways does not alter resistance or susceptibility to HGA. Instead, L. pneumophila cells are only susceptible to inhibition when at low density, regardless of whether they are in the stationary or replicating phase. It therefore remains to be discovered how individual L. pneumophila cells at high density protect themselves from HGA.

Thinking about the natural habitats of L. pneumophila, Levin et al. envision individual bacterial cells sticking to a surface, such as the interior of a water pipe (Figure 1). As L. pneumophila begin to replicate, they form a small colony, then grow to form a large cooperative community, likely sharing resources liberated by digestive enzymes that they have secreted (White and Cianciotto, 2019). After reaching a certain density, the residents protect their turf from other bacteria by releasing a pulse of HGA. Since the high concentration of bacteria in the colony also triggers resistance to HGA, the community is automatically protected from the inhibitor.

High-density colonies of Legionella protect themselves by secreting pulses of HGA.

The development of Legionella colonies begins with individual cells adhering to a surface, such as the inside of a water pipe. After reaching a certain density, the bacteria intensify the secretion of HGA, which prevents other Legionella cells from joining the colony. Image credit: Elisa D. Hughes (CC BY 4.0).

The work of Levin, Goldspiel and Malik provides an important insight into how Legionella persist within microbial communities, and also identifies several questions that warrant further investigation. First, as biofilms comprised of a single species are not common in nature (Elias and Banin, 2012), it would be useful to know more about the impact of HGA on non-Legionella bacteria. In addition, understanding how the reactive intermediate of HGA is able to inhibit Legionella, and how individuals within dense colonies of the pathogen acquire resistance, could significantly advance the broad field of microbiology ecology. Finally, it is tempting to speculate that the HGA inhibition and resistance pathways discovered by Levin et al. could help identify new ways of eliminating pathogenic Legionella from engineered water systems.

References

    1. Steinert M
    2. Engelhard H
    3. Flügel M
    4. Wintermeyer E
    5. Hacker J
    (1995)
    The lly protein protects Legionella pneumophila from light but does not directly influence its intracellular survival in Hartmannella vermiformis
    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61:2428–2430.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Elisa D Hughes

    Elisa D Hughes is in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4897-8094
  2. Michele S Swanson

    Michele Swanson is in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, United States

    For correspondence
    mswanson@umich.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2542-0266

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: June 28, 2019 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2019, Hughes and Swanson

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 906
    Page views
  • 85
    Downloads
  • 3
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Elisa D Hughes
  2. Michele S Swanson
(2019)
Bacteria: How Legionella defend their turf
eLife 8:e48695.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48695

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Sofia N Moraes, Jordan T Becker ... Reuben S Harris
    Research Article

    Viruses have evolved diverse mechanisms to antagonize host immunity such as direct inhibition and relocalization of cellular APOBEC3B (A3B) by the ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) of Epstein-Barr virus. Here, we investigate the mechanistic conservation and evolutionary origin of this innate immune counteraction strategy. First, we find that human gamma-herpesvirus RNRs engage A3B via largely distinct surfaces. Second, we show that RNR-mediated enzymatic inhibition and relocalization of A3B depend upon binding to different regions of the catalytic domain. Third, we show that the capability of viral RNRs to antagonize A3B is conserved among gamma-herpesviruses that infect humans and Old World monkeys that encode this enzyme but absent in homologous viruses that infect New World monkeys that naturally lack the A3B gene. Finally, we reconstruct the ancestral primate A3B protein and demonstrate that it is active and similarly engaged by the RNRs from viruses that infect humans and Old World monkeys but not by the RNRs from viruses that infect New World monkeys. These results combine to indicate that the birth of A3B at a critical branchpoint in primate evolution may have been a driving force in selecting for an ancestral gamma-herpesvirus with an expanded RNR functionality through counteraction of this antiviral enzyme.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Paul Tupper, Shraddha Pai ... Caroline Colijn
    Research Article Updated

    The role of schools in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 is controversial, with some claiming they are an important driver of the pandemic and others arguing that transmission in schools is negligible. School cluster reports that have been collected in various jurisdictions are a source of data about transmission in schools. These reports consist of the name of a school, a date, and the number of students known to be infected. We provide a simple model for the frequency and size of clusters in this data, based on random arrivals of index cases at schools who then infect their classmates with a highly variable rate, fitting the overdispersion evident in the data. We fit our model to reports from four Canadian provinces, providing estimates of mean and dispersion for cluster size, as well as the distribution of the instantaneous transmission parameter β, whilst factoring in imperfect ascertainment. According to our model with parameters estimated from the data, in all four provinces (i) more than 65% of non-index cases occur in the 20% largest clusters, and (ii) reducing instantaneous transmission rate and the number of contacts a student has at any given time are effective in reducing the total number of cases, whereas strict bubbling (keeping contacts consistent over time) does not contribute much to reduce cluster sizes. We predict strict bubbling to be more valuable in scenarios with substantially higher transmission rates.