Gene Drive: A family of killers
Spok genes are meiotic drivers that increase their own chances of transmission by killing gametes that do not inherit them.
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, United States
- Open University, United Kingdom
- University of Kansas Medical Center, United States
Some genes are born criminals. Mendel’s law of segregation states that the two alleles of a heterozygote are each transmitted into half of the gametes, but genes called meiotic drivers break this law by striving to be the only gene variant inherited. This selfish behavior can help them to spread in a population, but it can also decrease the fitness of the organisms carrying the loci (Sandler and Novitski, 1957; Zimmering et al., 1970; Zanders and Unckless, 2019).
Meiotic drivers employ a variety of self-promoting mechanisms (Lindholm et al., 2016). Some are particularly ruthless because they kill the gametes or spores that do not inherit the drive gene. Meiotic drivers are found throughout eukaryotes, including mammals, but relatively little is known about the genes responsible. Now, in eLife, Hanna Johannesson and co-workers at Uppsala University, the University of Bordeaux and Wageningen University – including Aaron Vogan and Lorena Ament-Velásquez, both from Uppsala, as joint first authors – report on the genetic architecture underlying a series of killer meiotic drive phenotypes in the fungus Podospora anserina (Vogan et al., 2019).
P. anserina is an excellent model organism for studying meiotic drive, largely because the phenotype is easy to observe: the two spores that inherit the drive locus are viable and pigmented, while the two spores that do not are dead and unpigmented (Figure 1A; Padieu and Bernet, 1967; Turner and Perkins, 1991; Espagne et al., 2008; Dalstra et al., 2003).
Figure 1
Meiotic drive in Podospora anserina.
(A) A heterozygous diploid generated by mating a naïve strain to one carrying Spok2 undergoes meiosis and generates four spores. One possible outcome of meiosis is depicted. The spores that inherit Spok2 are alive (pigmented), while the spores that do not inherit the Spok2 gene are destroyed (unpigmented, hazard signs). (B) A heterozygous diploid generated by mating the Psk-1 strain (purple) to the Psk-7 strain (green) undergoes meiosis and generates four spores. Note that the Spok block (black oval) is on different chromosomes in the two isolates. Two possible outcomes are depicted: (left) all four spores survive because they all inherited Spok2 and the block that contains Spok3 and Spok4; (right) two of the four spores do not survive because they did not inherit the Spok block.
P. anserina strains carrying spore-killing loci have been sorted into seven types (Psks) based on their killing phenotypes, but the genes underlying these phenotypes were unknown (van der Gaag et al., 2000). Recently, Spok2 was identified as an autonomous single-gene meiotic driver in P. anserina, and it was shown that the Spok genes comprise a gene family found in many copies in diverse fungal lineages (Grognet et al., 2014). These discoveries suggested the Spok genes as candidates for causing the Psk phenotypes.
Vogan et al. started by sequencing and assembling the genomes of six P. anserina strains representing the distinct spore-killing phenotypes. These assemblies showed that Spok2 is present in most P. anserina isolates and facilitated the discovery of two new Spok genes (Spok3 and Spok4) that are both spore killers. Curiously, these two genes are found within a block of sequence that is found in single copy at different locations within the various genomes. In some, the block contains only Spok3 or Spok4, but in others it contains both. How the block has moved during the evolutionary history of P. anserina is a mystery.
Next, Vogan et al. complemented their genomic approach with classical genetic analyses. They demonstrated that all the Psk phenotypes can be explained by just three genes (Spok2, Spok3 and Spok4). Spore killing occurs when two out of the four spores fail to inherit one or more of the Spok genes present in the diploid cell that underwent meiosis (Figure 1A and B). Strains with no Spok genes are considered naïve and spore killing will occur when these strains are crossed to Psk strains, but not to other naïve strains. The most dominant Psk phenotypes, Psk-1 and Psk-7, contain all three Spok genes. These strains cause killing when crossed to all other types. Interestingly, killing is also observed when Psk-1 and Psk-7 are crossed to each other because the Spok block is found at different loci in the two strains, which means that some spores do not inherit it (Figure 1B). The other strains that cause killing contain one or two Spok genes. Again, their phenotypes are explained by the identity and location of their Spok genes.
The latest work also provides a significant advance in our understanding of the mechanisms used by Spok genes. Previous work demonstrated that these genes encode both killing and resistance functions in genetically separable domains and predicted a kinase domain in one of these regions (Grognet et al., 2014). The new work shows that Spok3 can be expressed outside of spore formation, and Vogan et al. exploit this observation to better characterize how single Spok genes carry out their dual roles. In particular they show that the region required for the resistance function must include a cysteine-rich domain (in addition to the kinase domain mentioned above). Moreover, they identify a nuclease domain and demonstrate that it is required for the killing function. However, how the nuclease domain promotes killing and how the kinase domain neutralizes that killing are unknown.
It is becoming clear that genetic criminals that break Mendel’s law of segregation are not rare. Discovering the mechanisms used by meiotic drive genes and how they evolve is necessary to fully understand gametogenesis. Exciting discoveries in Podospora will continue to shape our understanding of the molecular genetics of meiotic drive.
References
-
Genes that bias Mendelian segregationPLOS Genetics 10:e1004387.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004387
-
The ecology and evolutionary dynamics of meiotic driveTrends in Ecology & Evolution 31:315–326.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.001
-
[Mode of action of the genes responsible for abortion of certain products of meiosis in the ascomycete, Podospora anserina]Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires Des Seances De l'Academie Des Sciences. Serie D: Sciences Naturelles 264:2300–2303.
-
Meiotic drive as an evolutionary forceThe American Naturalist 91:105–110.https://doi.org/10.1086/281969
-
Meiotic drive in Neurospora and other fungiThe American Naturalist 137:416–429.https://doi.org/10.1086/285174
-
Spore-killing meiotic drive factors in a natural population of the fungus Podospora anserinaGenetics 156:593–605.
-
Fertility costs of meiotic driversCurrent Biology 29:R512–R520.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.046
-
Mechanisms of meiotic driveAnnual Review of Genetics 4:409–436.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.04.120170.002205
Article and author information
Author details
Mickaël De Carvalho
Publication history
Copyright
© 2019, De Carvalho and Zanders
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,196
- views
-
- 109
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Gene Drive: A family of killers
eLife 8:e49211.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49211
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
Lineages of rod-shaped bacteria such as Escherichia coli exhibit a temporal decline in elongation rate in a manner comparable to cellular or biological aging. The effect results from the production of asymmetrical daughters, one with a lower elongation rate, by the division of a mother cell. The slower daughter compared to the faster daughter, denoted respectively as the old and new daughters, has more aggregates of damaged proteins and fewer expressed gene products. We have examined further the degree of asymmetry by measuring the density of ribosomes between old and new daughters and between their poles. We found that ribosomes were denser in the new daughter and also in the new pole of the daughters. These ribosome patterns match the ones we previously found for expressed gene products. This outcome suggests that the asymmetry is not likely to result from properties unique to the gene expressed in our previous study, but rather from a more fundamental upstream process affecting the distribution of ribosomal abundance. Because damage aggregates and ribosomes are both more abundant at the poles of E. coli cells, we suggest that competition for space between the two could explain the reduced ribosomal density in old daughters. Using published values for aggregate sizes and the relationship between ribosomal number and elongation rates, we show that the aggregate volumes could in principle displace quantitatively the amount of ribosomes needed to reduce the elongation rate of the old daughters.
-
- Evolutionary Biology
- Genetics and Genomics
Evolutionary arms races can arise at the contact surfaces between host and viral proteins, producing dynamic spaces in which genetic variants are continually pursued. However, the sampling of genetic variation must be balanced with the need to maintain protein function. A striking case is given by protein kinase R (PKR), a member of the mammalian innate immune system. PKR detects viral replication within the host cell and halts protein synthesis to prevent viral replication by phosphorylating eIF2α, a component of the translation initiation machinery. PKR is targeted by many viral antagonists, including poxvirus pseudosubstrate antagonists that mimic the natural substrate, eIF2α, and inhibit PKR activity. Remarkably, PKR has several rapidly evolving residues at this interface, suggesting it is engaging in an evolutionary arms race, despite the surface’s critical role in phosphorylating eIF2α. To systematically explore the evolutionary opportunities available at this dynamic interface, we generated and characterized a library of 426 SNP-accessible nonsynonymous variants of human PKR for their ability to escape inhibition by the model pseudosubstrate inhibitor K3, encoded by the vaccinia virus gene K3L. We identified key sites in the PKR kinase domain that harbor K3-resistant variants, as well as critical sites where variation leads to loss of function. We find K3-resistant variants are readily available throughout the interface and are enriched at sites under positive selection. Moreover, variants beneficial against K3 were also beneficial against an enhanced variant of K3, indicating resilience to viral adaptation. Overall, we find that the eIF2α-binding surface of PKR is highly malleable, potentiating its evolutionary ability to combat viral inhibition.
