Gene Drive: A family of killers
Spok genes are meiotic drivers that increase their own chances of transmission by killing gametes that do not inherit them.
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, United States
- Open University, United Kingdom
- University of Kansas Medical Center, United States
Some genes are born criminals. Mendel’s law of segregation states that the two alleles of a heterozygote are each transmitted into half of the gametes, but genes called meiotic drivers break this law by striving to be the only gene variant inherited. This selfish behavior can help them to spread in a population, but it can also decrease the fitness of the organisms carrying the loci (Sandler and Novitski, 1957; Zimmering et al., 1970; Zanders and Unckless, 2019).
Meiotic drivers employ a variety of self-promoting mechanisms (Lindholm et al., 2016). Some are particularly ruthless because they kill the gametes or spores that do not inherit the drive gene. Meiotic drivers are found throughout eukaryotes, including mammals, but relatively little is known about the genes responsible. Now, in eLife, Hanna Johannesson and co-workers at Uppsala University, the University of Bordeaux and Wageningen University – including Aaron Vogan and Lorena Ament-Velásquez, both from Uppsala, as joint first authors – report on the genetic architecture underlying a series of killer meiotic drive phenotypes in the fungus Podospora anserina (Vogan et al., 2019).
P. anserina is an excellent model organism for studying meiotic drive, largely because the phenotype is easy to observe: the two spores that inherit the drive locus are viable and pigmented, while the two spores that do not are dead and unpigmented (Figure 1A; Padieu and Bernet, 1967; Turner and Perkins, 1991; Espagne et al., 2008; Dalstra et al., 2003).
Figure 1
Meiotic drive in Podospora anserina.
(A) A heterozygous diploid generated by mating a naïve strain to one carrying Spok2 undergoes meiosis and generates four spores. One possible outcome of meiosis is depicted. The spores that inherit Spok2 are alive (pigmented), while the spores that do not inherit the Spok2 gene are destroyed (unpigmented, hazard signs). (B) A heterozygous diploid generated by mating the Psk-1 strain (purple) to the Psk-7 strain (green) undergoes meiosis and generates four spores. Note that the Spok block (black oval) is on different chromosomes in the two isolates. Two possible outcomes are depicted: (left) all four spores survive because they all inherited Spok2 and the block that contains Spok3 and Spok4; (right) two of the four spores do not survive because they did not inherit the Spok block.
P. anserina strains carrying spore-killing loci have been sorted into seven types (Psks) based on their killing phenotypes, but the genes underlying these phenotypes were unknown (van der Gaag et al., 2000). Recently, Spok2 was identified as an autonomous single-gene meiotic driver in P. anserina, and it was shown that the Spok genes comprise a gene family found in many copies in diverse fungal lineages (Grognet et al., 2014). These discoveries suggested the Spok genes as candidates for causing the Psk phenotypes.
Vogan et al. started by sequencing and assembling the genomes of six P. anserina strains representing the distinct spore-killing phenotypes. These assemblies showed that Spok2 is present in most P. anserina isolates and facilitated the discovery of two new Spok genes (Spok3 and Spok4) that are both spore killers. Curiously, these two genes are found within a block of sequence that is found in single copy at different locations within the various genomes. In some, the block contains only Spok3 or Spok4, but in others it contains both. How the block has moved during the evolutionary history of P. anserina is a mystery.
Next, Vogan et al. complemented their genomic approach with classical genetic analyses. They demonstrated that all the Psk phenotypes can be explained by just three genes (Spok2, Spok3 and Spok4). Spore killing occurs when two out of the four spores fail to inherit one or more of the Spok genes present in the diploid cell that underwent meiosis (Figure 1A and B). Strains with no Spok genes are considered naïve and spore killing will occur when these strains are crossed to Psk strains, but not to other naïve strains. The most dominant Psk phenotypes, Psk-1 and Psk-7, contain all three Spok genes. These strains cause killing when crossed to all other types. Interestingly, killing is also observed when Psk-1 and Psk-7 are crossed to each other because the Spok block is found at different loci in the two strains, which means that some spores do not inherit it (Figure 1B). The other strains that cause killing contain one or two Spok genes. Again, their phenotypes are explained by the identity and location of their Spok genes.
The latest work also provides a significant advance in our understanding of the mechanisms used by Spok genes. Previous work demonstrated that these genes encode both killing and resistance functions in genetically separable domains and predicted a kinase domain in one of these regions (Grognet et al., 2014). The new work shows that Spok3 can be expressed outside of spore formation, and Vogan et al. exploit this observation to better characterize how single Spok genes carry out their dual roles. In particular they show that the region required for the resistance function must include a cysteine-rich domain (in addition to the kinase domain mentioned above). Moreover, they identify a nuclease domain and demonstrate that it is required for the killing function. However, how the nuclease domain promotes killing and how the kinase domain neutralizes that killing are unknown.
It is becoming clear that genetic criminals that break Mendel’s law of segregation are not rare. Discovering the mechanisms used by meiotic drive genes and how they evolve is necessary to fully understand gametogenesis. Exciting discoveries in Podospora will continue to shape our understanding of the molecular genetics of meiotic drive.
References
-
Genes that bias Mendelian segregationPLOS Genetics 10:e1004387.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004387
-
The ecology and evolutionary dynamics of meiotic driveTrends in Ecology & Evolution 31:315–326.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.001
-
[Mode of action of the genes responsible for abortion of certain products of meiosis in the ascomycete, Podospora anserina]Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires Des Seances De l'Academie Des Sciences. Serie D: Sciences Naturelles 264:2300–2303.
-
Meiotic drive as an evolutionary forceThe American Naturalist 91:105–110.https://doi.org/10.1086/281969
-
Meiotic drive in Neurospora and other fungiThe American Naturalist 137:416–429.https://doi.org/10.1086/285174
-
Spore-killing meiotic drive factors in a natural population of the fungus Podospora anserinaGenetics 156:593–605.
-
Fertility costs of meiotic driversCurrent Biology 29:R512–R520.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.046
-
Mechanisms of meiotic driveAnnual Review of Genetics 4:409–436.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.04.120170.002205
Article and author information
Author details
Mickaël De Carvalho
Publication history
Copyright
© 2019, De Carvalho and Zanders
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,200
- views
-
- 109
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Gene Drive: A family of killers
eLife 8:e49211.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49211
Further reading
-
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
Understanding the origins of novel, complex phenotypes is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Poison frogs of the family Dendrobatidae have evolved the novel ability to acquire alkaloids from their diet for chemical defense at least three times. However, taxon sampling for alkaloids has been biased towards colorful species, without similar attention paid to inconspicuous ones that are often assumed to be undefended. As a result, our understanding of how chemical defense evolved in this group is incomplete. Here, we provide new data showing that, in contrast to previous studies, species from each undefended poison frog clade have measurable yet low amounts of alkaloids. We confirm that undefended dendrobatids regularly consume mites and ants, which are known sources of alkaloids. Thus, our data suggest that diet is insufficient to explain the defended phenotype. Our data support the existence of a phenotypic intermediate between toxin consumption and sequestration — passive accumulation — that differs from sequestration in that it involves no derived forms of transport and storage mechanisms yet results in low levels of toxin accumulation. We discuss the concept of passive accumulation and its potential role in the origin of chemical defenses in poison frogs and other toxin-sequestering organisms. In light of ideas from pharmacokinetics, we incorporate new and old data from poison frogs into an evolutionary model that could help explain the origins of acquired chemical defenses in animals and provide insight into the molecular processes that govern the fate of ingested toxins.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Evolutionary Biology
As pathogens spread in a population of hosts, immunity is built up, and the pool of susceptible individuals are depleted. This generates selective pressure, to which many human RNA viruses, such as influenza virus or SARS-CoV-2, respond with rapid antigenic evolution and frequent emergence of immune evasive variants. However, the host’s immune systems adapt, and older immune responses wane, such that escape variants only enjoy a growth advantage for a limited time. If variant growth dynamics and reshaping of host-immunity operate on comparable time scales, viral adaptation is determined by eco-evolutionary interactions that are not captured by models of rapid evolution in a fixed environment. Here, we use a Susceptible/Infected model to describe the interaction between an evolving viral population in a dynamic but immunologically diverse host population. We show that depending on strain cross-immunity, heterogeneity of the host population, and durability of immune responses, escape variants initially grow exponentially, but lose their growth advantage before reaching high frequencies. Their subsequent dynamics follows an anomalous random walk determined by future escape variants and results in variant trajectories that are unpredictable. This model can explain the apparent contradiction between the clearly adaptive nature of antigenic evolution and the quasi-neutral dynamics of high-frequency variants observed for influenza viruses.
