A curative combination cancer therapy achieves high fractional cell killing through low cross-resistance and drug additivity

  1. Adam C Palmer
  2. Christopher Chidley
  3. Peter K Sorger  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Curative cancer therapies are uncommon and nearly always involve multi-drug combinations developed by experimentation in humans; unfortunately, the mechanistic basis for the success of such combinations has rarely been investigated in detail, obscuring lessons learned. Here we use isobologram analysis to score pharmacological interaction, and clone tracing and CRISPR screening to measure cross-resistance among the five drugs comprising R‑CHOP, a combination therapy that frequently cures Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas. We find that drugs in R‑CHOP exhibit very low cross-resistance but not synergistic interaction: together they achieve a greater fractional kill according to the null hypothesis for both the Loewe dose-additivity model and the Bliss effect-independence model. These data provide direct evidence for the 50-year old hypothesis that a curative cancer therapy can be constructed on the basis of independently effective drugs having non-overlapping mechanisms of resistance, without synergistic interaction, which has immediate significance for the design of new drug combinations.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data is provided for all clone tracing and CRISPR screen experiments.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Adam C Palmer

    Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5028-7028
  2. Christopher Chidley

    Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8212-3148
  3. Peter K Sorger

    Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    peter_sorger@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    Peter K Sorger, is a member of the SAB or Board of Directors of Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Glencoe Software,Applied Biomath and RareCyte Inc and has equity in these companies. In the last five years the Sorgerlab has received research funding from Novartis and Merck. P.K.S. declares that none of theserelationships are directly or indirectly related to the content of this manuscript.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3364-1838

Funding

National Institutes of Health (P50-GM107618)

  • Adam C Palmer
  • Christopher Chidley
  • Peter K Sorger

National Institutes of Health (U54-CA225088)

  • Adam C Palmer
  • Christopher Chidley
  • Peter K Sorger

National Health and Medical Research Council (1072965)

  • Adam C Palmer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Charles L Sawyers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Version history

  1. Received: July 9, 2019
  2. Accepted: November 18, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 19, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 6, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Palmer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,382
    views
  • 918
    downloads
  • 89
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Adam C Palmer
  2. Christopher Chidley
  3. Peter K Sorger
(2019)
A curative combination cancer therapy achieves high fractional cell killing through low cross-resistance and drug additivity
eLife 8:e50036.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50036

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50036

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ian Lorimer
    Insight

    Establishing a zebrafish model of a deadly type of brain tumor highlights the role of the immune system in the early stages of the disease.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Xia Shen, Xiang Peng ... Chen-Ying Liu
    Research Article

    The role of processing bodies (P-bodies) in tumorigenesis and tumor progression is not well understood. Here, we showed that the oncogenes YAP/TAZ promote P-body formation in a series of cancer cell lines. Mechanistically, both transcriptional activation of the P-body-related genes SAMD4A, AJUBA, and WTIP and transcriptional suppression of the tumor suppressor gene PNRC1 are involved in enhancing the effects of YAP/TAZ on P-body formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. By reexpression of PNRC1 or knockdown of P-body core genes (DDX6, DCP1A, and LSM14A), we determined that disruption of P-bodies attenuates cell proliferation, cell migration, and tumor growth induced by overexpression of YAP5SA in CRC. Analysis of a pancancer CRISPR screen database (DepMap) revealed co-dependencies between YAP/TEAD and the P-body core genes and correlations between the mRNA levels of SAMD4A, AJUBA, WTIP, PNRC1, and YAP target genes. Our study suggests that the P-body is a new downstream effector of YAP/TAZ, which implies that reexpression of PNRC1 or disruption of P-bodies is a potential therapeutic strategy for tumors with active YAP.