A curative combination cancer therapy achieves high fractional cell killing through low cross-resistance and drug additivity

  1. Adam C Palmer
  2. Christopher Chidley
  3. Peter K Sorger  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Curative cancer therapies are uncommon and nearly always involve multi-drug combinations developed by experimentation in humans; unfortunately, the mechanistic basis for the success of such combinations has rarely been investigated in detail, obscuring lessons learned. Here we use isobologram analysis to score pharmacological interaction, and clone tracing and CRISPR screening to measure cross-resistance among the five drugs comprising R‑CHOP, a combination therapy that frequently cures Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas. We find that drugs in R‑CHOP exhibit very low cross-resistance but not synergistic interaction: together they achieve a greater fractional kill according to the null hypothesis for both the Loewe dose-additivity model and the Bliss effect-independence model. These data provide direct evidence for the 50-year old hypothesis that a curative cancer therapy can be constructed on the basis of independently effective drugs having non-overlapping mechanisms of resistance, without synergistic interaction, which has immediate significance for the design of new drug combinations.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data is provided for all clone tracing and CRISPR screen experiments.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Adam C Palmer

    Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5028-7028
  2. Christopher Chidley

    Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8212-3148
  3. Peter K Sorger

    Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    peter_sorger@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    Peter K Sorger, is a member of the SAB or Board of Directors of Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Glencoe Software,Applied Biomath and RareCyte Inc and has equity in these companies. In the last five years the Sorgerlab has received research funding from Novartis and Merck. P.K.S. declares that none of theserelationships are directly or indirectly related to the content of this manuscript.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3364-1838

Funding

National Institutes of Health (P50-GM107618)

  • Adam C Palmer
  • Christopher Chidley
  • Peter K Sorger

National Institutes of Health (U54-CA225088)

  • Adam C Palmer
  • Christopher Chidley
  • Peter K Sorger

National Health and Medical Research Council (1072965)

  • Adam C Palmer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Palmer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,045
    views
  • 983
    downloads
  • 103
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Adam C Palmer
  2. Christopher Chidley
  3. Peter K Sorger
(2019)
A curative combination cancer therapy achieves high fractional cell killing through low cross-resistance and drug additivity
eLife 8:e50036.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50036

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50036

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ida Marie Boisen, Nadia Krarup Knudsen ... Martin Blomberg Jensen
    Research Article

    Testicular microcalcifications consist of hydroxyapatite and have been associated with an increased risk of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) but are also found in benign cases such as loss-of-function variants in the phosphate transporter SLC34A2. Here, we show that fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a regulator of phosphate homeostasis, is expressed in testicular germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), embryonal carcinoma (EC), and human embryonic stem cells. FGF23 is not glycosylated in TGCTs and therefore cleaved into a C-terminal fragment which competitively antagonizes full-length FGF23. Here, Fgf23 knockout mice presented with marked calcifications in the epididymis, spermatogenic arrest, and focally germ cells expressing the osteoblast marker Osteocalcin (gene name: Bglap, protein name). Moreover, the frequent testicular microcalcifications in mice with no functional androgen receptor and lack of circulating gonadotropins are associated with lower Slc34a2 and higher Bglap/Slc34a1 (protein name: NPT2a) expression compared with wild-type mice. In accordance, human testicular specimens with microcalcifications also have lower SLC34A2 and a subpopulation of germ cells express phosphate transporter NPT2a, Osteocalcin, and RUNX2 highlighting aberrant local phosphate handling and expression of bone-specific proteins. Mineral disturbance in vitro using calcium or phosphate treatment induced deposition of calcium phosphate in a spermatogonial cell line and this effect was fully rescued by the mineralization inhibitor pyrophosphate. In conclusion, testicular microcalcifications arise secondary to local alterations in mineral homeostasis, which in combination with impaired Sertoli cell function and reduced levels of mineralization inhibitors due to high alkaline phosphatase activity in GCNIS and TGCTs facilitate osteogenic-like differentiation of testicular cells and deposition of hydroxyapatite.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Qianqian Ju, Wenjing Sheng ... Cheng Sun
    Research Article

    TAK1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that is a key regulator in a wide variety of cellular processes. However, the functions and mechanisms involved in cancer metastasis are still not well understood. Here, we found that TAK1 knockdown promoted esophageal squamous cancer carcinoma (ESCC) migration and invasion, whereas TAK1 overexpression resulted in the opposite outcome. These in vitro findings were recapitulated in vivo in a xenograft metastatic mouse model. Mechanistically, co-immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry demonstrated that TAK1 interacted with phospholipase C epsilon 1 (PLCE1) and phosphorylated PLCE1 at serine 1060 (S1060). Functional studies revealed that phosphorylation at S1060 in PLCE1 resulted in decreased enzyme activity, leading to the repression of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) hydrolysis. As a result, the degradation products of PIP2 including diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol IP3 were reduced, which thereby suppressed signal transduction in the axis of PKC/GSK-3β/β-Catenin. Consequently, expression of cancer metastasis-related genes was impeded by TAK1. Overall, our data indicate that TAK1 plays a negative role in ESCC metastasis, which depends on the TAK1-induced phosphorylation of PLCE1 at S1060.