Abstract
Curative cancer therapies are uncommon and nearly always involve multi-drug combinations developed by experimentation in humans; unfortunately, the mechanistic basis for the success of such combinations has rarely been investigated in detail, obscuring lessons learned. Here we use isobologram analysis to score pharmacological interaction, and clone tracing and CRISPR screening to measure cross-resistance among the five drugs comprising R‑CHOP, a combination therapy that frequently cures Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas. We find that drugs in R‑CHOP exhibit very low cross-resistance but not synergistic interaction: together they achieve a greater fractional kill according to the null hypothesis for both the Loewe dose-additivity model and the Bliss effect-independence model. These data provide direct evidence for the 50-year old hypothesis that a curative cancer therapy can be constructed on the basis of independently effective drugs having non-overlapping mechanisms of resistance, without synergistic interaction, which has immediate significance for the design of new drug combinations.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (P50-GM107618)
- Adam C Palmer
- Christopher Chidley
- Peter K Sorger
National Institutes of Health (U54-CA225088)
- Adam C Palmer
- Christopher Chidley
- Peter K Sorger
National Health and Medical Research Council (1072965)
- Adam C Palmer
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Charles L Sawyers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
Publication history
- Received: July 9, 2019
- Accepted: November 18, 2019
- Accepted Manuscript published: November 19, 2019 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: December 6, 2019 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2019, Palmer et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,318
- Page views
-
- 389
- Downloads
-
- 6
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.