Feedback contribution to surface motion perception in the human early visual cortex

  1. Ingo Marquardt  Is a corresponding author
  2. Peter de Weerd  Is a corresponding author
  3. Marian Schneider
  4. Omer Faruk Gulban
  5. Dimo Ivanov
  6. Yawen Wang
  7. Kâmil Uludağ  Is a corresponding author
  1. Maastricht University, Netherlands
  2. University Health Network, Canada

Abstract

Human visual surface perception has neural correlates in early visual cortex, but the role of feedback during surface segmentation in human early visual cortex remains unknown. Feedback projections preferentially enter superficial and deep anatomical layers, which provides a hypothesis for the cortical depth distribution of fMRI activity related to feedback. Using ultra-high field fMRI, we report a depth distribution of activation in line with feedback during the (illusory) perception of surface motion. Our results fit with a signal re-entering in superficial depths of V1, followed by a feedforward sweep of the re-entered information through V2 and V3. The magnitude and sign of the BOLD response strongly depended on the presence of texture in the background, and was additionally modulated by the presence of illusory motion perception compatible with feedback. In summary, the present study demonstrates the potential of depth-resolved fMRI in tackling biomechanical questions on perception.

Data availability

The fMRI dataset, experimental stimuli, and analysis code are publicly available. The fMRI dataset is available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3366301). The software used for the presentation of retinotopic mapping stimuli, and for the corresponding analysis, is available on github (https://github.com/ingo-m/pyprf). Example videos of the main experimental stimuli are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2583017). If you would like to reproduce the experimental stimuli, the respective PsychoPy code can be found on github (https://github.com/ingo-m/PacMan/tree/master/stimuli/experiment). The respective repository also contains the analysis code and a brief description how to reproduce the analysis (https://github.com/ingo-m/PacMan). High-level visualisations (e.g. cortical depth profiles & signal timecourses) and group-level statistical tests are implemented in a separate repository (https://github.com/ingo-m/py_depthsampling/tree/PacMan).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ingo Marquardt

    Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    ingo.marquardt@maastrichtuniversity.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5178-9951
  2. Peter de Weerd

    Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    p.deweerd@maastrichtuniversity.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marian Schneider

    Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Omer Faruk Gulban

    Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7761-3727
  5. Dimo Ivanov

    Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yawen Wang

    Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Kâmil Uludağ

    Techna Institute & Koerner Scientist in MR Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    Kamil.Uludag@rmp.uhn.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-11-002)

  • Kâmil Uludağ

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (406-14-085)

  • Ingo Marquardt
  • Kâmil Uludağ

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Tobias H Donner, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

Ethics

Human subjects: Healthy participants gave informed consent before the experiment, and the study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the Faculty for Psychology & Neuroscience, Maastricht University. (reference number: ERCPN 180_03_06_2017 ).

Version history

  1. Received: August 8, 2019
  2. Accepted: June 3, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 4, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: June 9, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: June 24, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Marquardt et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,350
    views
  • 191
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ingo Marquardt
  2. Peter de Weerd
  3. Marian Schneider
  4. Omer Faruk Gulban
  5. Dimo Ivanov
  6. Yawen Wang
  7. Kâmil Uludağ
(2020)
Feedback contribution to surface motion perception in the human early visual cortex
eLife 9:e50933.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50933

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50933

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Vezha Boboeva, Alberto Pezzotta ... Athena Akrami
    Research Article

    The central tendency bias, or contraction bias, is a phenomenon where the judgment of the magnitude of items held in working memory appears to be biased toward the average of past observations. It is assumed to be an optimal strategy by the brain and commonly thought of as an expression of the brain’s ability to learn the statistical structure of sensory input. On the other hand, recency biases such as serial dependence are also commonly observed and are thought to reflect the content of working memory. Recent results from an auditory delayed comparison task in rats suggest that both biases may be more related than previously thought: when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) was silenced, both short-term and contraction biases were reduced. By proposing a model of the circuit that may be involved in generating the behavior, we show that a volatile working memory content susceptible to shifting to the past sensory experience – producing short-term sensory history biases – naturally leads to contraction bias. The errors, occurring at the level of individual trials, are sampled from the full distribution of the stimuli and are not due to a gradual shift of the memory toward the sensory distribution’s mean. Our results are consistent with a broad set of behavioral findings and provide predictions of performance across different stimulus distributions and timings, delay intervals, as well as neuronal dynamics in putative working memory areas. Finally, we validate our model by performing a set of human psychophysics experiments of an auditory parametric working memory task.

    1. Neuroscience
    Michael Berger, Michèle Fraatz ... Henrike Scholz
    Research Article

    The brain regulates food intake in response to internal energy demands and food availability. However, can internal energy storage influence the type of memory that is formed? We show that the duration of starvation determines whether Drosophila melanogaster forms appetitive short-term or longer-lasting intermediate memories. The internal glycogen storage in the muscles and adipose tissue influences how intensely sucrose-associated information is stored. Insulin-like signaling in octopaminergic reward neurons integrates internal energy storage into memory formation. Octopamine, in turn, suppresses the formation of long-term memory. Octopamine is not required for short-term memory because octopamine-deficient mutants can form appetitive short-term memory for sucrose and to other nutrients depending on the internal energy status. The reduced positive reinforcing effect of sucrose at high internal glycogen levels, combined with the increased stability of food-related memories due to prolonged periods of starvation, could lead to increased food intake.