Apolipoprotein L-1 renal risk variants form active channels at the plasma membrane driving cytotoxicity

  1. Joseph A Giovinazzo  Is a corresponding author
  2. Russell P Thomson
  3. Nailya Khalizova
  4. Patrick Zager
  5. Nirav Malani
  6. Enrique Javier Rodriguez-Boulan
  7. Jayne Raper  Is a corresponding author
  8. Ryan Schreiner  Is a corresponding author
  1. Hunter College of the City University of New York, United States
  2. Weill Cornell Medicine, United States
  3. Genosity, United States

Abstract

Recently evolved alleles of Apolipoprotein L-1 (APOL1) provide increased protection against African trypanosome parasites while also significantly increasing the risk of developing kidney disease in humans. APOL1 protects against trypanosome infections by forming ion channels within the parasite, causing lysis. While the correlation to kidney disease is robust, there is little consensus concerning the underlying disease mechanism. We show in human cells that the APOL1 renal risk variants have a population of active channels at the plasma membrane, which results in an influx of both Na+ and Ca2+. We propose a model wherein APOL1 channel activity is the upstream event causing cell death, and that the activate-state, plasma membrane-localized channel represents the ideal drug target to combat APOL1-mediated kidney disease.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all figures in Dryad.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Joseph A Giovinazzo

    Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    joseph.giovinazzo@cuanschutz.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Russell P Thomson

    Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nailya Khalizova

    Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Patrick Zager

    Margaret Dyson Vision Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3993-9686
  5. Nirav Malani

    Bioinformatics & Data Science, Genosity, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Enrique Javier Rodriguez-Boulan

    Dyson Vision Research Institute - Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jayne Raper

    Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    raper@genectr.hunter.cuny.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ryan Schreiner

    Margaret Dyson Vision Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    ryanschreiner@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7457-6606

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM34107)

  • Enrique Javier Rodriguez-Boulan

National Science Foundation (IOS-1249166)

  • Jayne Raper

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Giovinazzo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,635
    views
  • 560
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Joseph A Giovinazzo
  2. Russell P Thomson
  3. Nailya Khalizova
  4. Patrick Zager
  5. Nirav Malani
  6. Enrique Javier Rodriguez-Boulan
  7. Jayne Raper
  8. Ryan Schreiner
(2020)
Apolipoprotein L-1 renal risk variants form active channels at the plasma membrane driving cytotoxicity
eLife 9:e51185.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51185

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51185

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.