Spinal signaling of C-fiber mediated pleasant touch in humans

  1. Andrew G Marshall  Is a corresponding author
  2. Manohar L Sharma
  3. Kate Marley
  4. Hakan Olausson
  5. Francis P McGlone
  1. University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
  2. Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
  3. University Hospital Aintree, United Kingdom
  4. Linköping University, Sweden
  5. Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom

Abstract

C-tactile afferents form a distinct channel that encodes pleasant tactile stimulation. Prevailing views indicate they project, as with other unmyelinated afferents, in lamina I-spinothalamic pathways. However, we found that spinothalamic ablation in humans, whilst profoundly impairing pain, temperature and itch, had no effect on pleasant touch perception. Only discriminative touch deficits were seen. These findings preclude privileged C-tactile-lamina I-spinothalamic projections and imply integrated hedonic and discriminative spinal processing from the body.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are either included in the manuscript and supporting files or Open Science Framework - accession code g8vyk

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrew G Marshall

    Institute of Aging and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    andrew.marshall@liverpool.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8273-7089
  2. Manohar L Sharma

    Department of Pain Medicine, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kate Marley

    Specialist Palliative Care Team, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hakan Olausson

    Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Francis P McGlone

    School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Pain Relief Foundation

  • Andrew G Marshall

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Ethical approval was obtained through the Health Research Authority National Research Ethics Service (Preston NRES committee, study reference 14/NW/1247). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was taken from all study participants.

Copyright

© 2019, Marshall et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,306
    views
  • 511
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrew G Marshall
  2. Manohar L Sharma
  3. Kate Marley
  4. Hakan Olausson
  5. Francis P McGlone
(2019)
Spinal signaling of C-fiber mediated pleasant touch in humans
eLife 8:e51642.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51642

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51642

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Andrea Brenna, Micaela Borsa ... Urs Albrecht
    Research Article

    The circadian clock enables organisms to synchronize biochemical and physiological processes over a 24 hr period. Natural changes in lighting conditions, as well as artificial disruptions like jet lag or shift work, can advance or delay the clock phase to align physiology with the environment. Within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, circadian timekeeping and resetting rely on both membrane depolarization and intracellular second-messenger signaling. Voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) facilitate calcium influx in both processes, activating intracellular signaling pathways that trigger Period (Per) gene expression. However, the precise mechanism by which these processes are concertedly gated remains unknown. Our study in mice demonstrates that cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) activity is modulated by light and regulates phase shifts of the circadian clock. We observed that knocking down Cdk5 in the SCN of mice affects phase delays but not phase advances. This is linked to uncontrolled calcium influx into SCN neurons and an unregulated protein kinase A (PKA)-calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase (CaMK)-cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) signaling pathway. Consequently, genes such as Per1 are not induced by light in the SCN of Cdk5 knock-down mice. Our experiments identified Cdk5 as a crucial light-modulated kinase that influences rapid clock phase adaptation. This finding elucidates how light responsiveness and clock phase coordination adapt activity onset to seasonal changes, jet lag, and shift work.

    1. Neuroscience
    Timo van Kerkoerle, Louise Pape ... Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
    Research Article

    The emergence of symbolic thinking has been proposed as a dominant cognitive criterion to distinguish humans from other primates during hominisation. Although the proper definition of a symbol has been the subject of much debate, one of its simplest features is bidirectional attachment: the content is accessible from the symbol, and vice versa. Behavioural observations scattered over the past four decades suggest that this criterion might not be met in non-human primates, as they fail to generalise an association learned in one temporal order (A to B) to the reverse order (B to A). Here, we designed an implicit fMRI test to investigate the neural mechanisms of arbitrary audio–visual and visual–visual pairing in monkeys and humans and probe their spontaneous reversibility. After learning a unidirectional association, humans showed surprise signals when this learned association was violated. Crucially, this effect occurred spontaneously in both learned and reversed directions, within an extended network of high-level brain areas, including, but also going beyond, the language network. In monkeys, by contrast, violations of association effects occurred solely in the learned direction and were largely confined to sensory areas. We propose that a human-specific brain network may have evolved the capacity for reversible symbolic reference.