A delayed fractionated dose RTS,S AS01 vaccine regimen mediates protection via improved T follicular helper and B cell responses

  1. Suresh Pallikkuth
  2. Sidhartha Chaudhury
  3. Pinyi Lu
  4. Li Pan
  5. Erik Jongert
  6. Ulrike Wille-Reece
  7. Savita Pahwa  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, United States
  2. Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, United States
  3. Biotechnology High Performance Computing Software Applications Institute (BHSAI), United States
  4. GSK Vaccine, Belgium
  5. PATH's Malaria Vaccine Initiative, United States

Abstract

Malaria-071, a controlled human malaria infection trial, demonstrated that administration of three doses of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine given at one month intervals was inferior to a delayed fractional dose (DFD) schedule (62.5% vs 86.7% protection respectively). To investigate the underlying immunologic mechanism, we analyzed the B and T peripheral follicular helper cell (pTfh) responses. Here we show that protection in both study arms was associated with early induction of functional IL-21-secreting circumsporozoite (CSP)-specific pTfh cells together with induction of CSP-specific memory B cell responses after the 2nd dose that persisted after the 3rd dose. Data integration of key immunologic measures identified a subset of non-protected individuals in the standard (STD) vaccine arm who lost prior protective B cell responses after receiving the 3rd vaccine dose. We conclude that the DFD regimen favors persistence of functional B cells post 3rd dose.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Suresh Pallikkuth

    Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Sidhartha Chaudhury

    Center for Enabling Capabilities, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Pinyi Lu

    Immunology & Vaccine Research, Biotechnology High Performance Computing Software Applications Institute (BHSAI), Maryland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Li Pan

    Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Erik Jongert

    GSK Vaccine, Rixensart, Belgium
    Competing interests
    Erik Jongert, is an employee of GSK, and own shares of GSK.
  6. Ulrike Wille-Reece

    PATH's Malaria Vaccine Initiative, PATH's Malaria Vaccine Initiative, Washington DC, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Savita Pahwa

    Miami Center for AIDS Research, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, United States
    For correspondence
    spahwa@med.miami.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4470-4216

Funding

PATH's Malaria Vaccine Initiative

  • Savita Pahwa

The funder contributed to conceptualization, data review and manuscript preparation.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,666
    views
  • 290
    downloads
  • 48
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Suresh Pallikkuth
  2. Sidhartha Chaudhury
  3. Pinyi Lu
  4. Li Pan
  5. Erik Jongert
  6. Ulrike Wille-Reece
  7. Savita Pahwa
(2020)
A delayed fractionated dose RTS,S AS01 vaccine regimen mediates protection via improved T follicular helper and B cell responses
eLife 9:e51889.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51889

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51889

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Shih-Wen Huang, Yein-Gei Lai ... Nan-Shih Liao
    Research Article

    Natural killer (NK) cells can control metastasis through cytotoxicity and IFN-γ production independently of T cells in experimental metastasis mouse models. The inverse correlation between NK activity and metastasis incidence supports a critical role for NK cells in human metastatic surveillance. However, autologous NK cell therapy has shown limited benefit in treating patients with metastatic solid tumors. Using a spontaneous metastasis mouse model of MHC-I+ breast cancer, we found that transfer of IL-15/IL-12-conditioned syngeneic NK cells after primary tumor resection promoted long-term survival of mice with low metastatic burden and induced a tumor-specific protective T cell response that is essential for the therapeutic effect. Furthermore, NK cell transfer augments activation of conventional dendritic cells (cDCs), Foxp3-CD4+ T cells and stem cell-like CD8+ T cells in metastatic lungs, to which IFN-γ of the transferred NK cells contributes significantly. These results imply direct interactions between transferred NK cells and endogenous cDCs to enhance T cell activation. We conducted an investigator-initiated clinical trial of autologous NK cell therapy in six patients with advanced cancer and observed that the NK cell therapy was safe and showed signs of effectiveness. These findings indicate that autologous NK cell therapy is effective in treating established low burden metastases of MHC-I+ tumor cells by activating the cDC-T cell axis at metastatic sites.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Sofia V Krasik, Ekaterina A Bryushkova ... Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya
    Research Article

    The current understanding of humoral immune response in cancer patients suggests that tumors may be infiltrated with diffuse B cells of extra-tumoral origin or may develop organized lymphoid structures, where somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection occur locally. These processes are believed to be significantly influenced by the tumor microenvironment through secretory factors and biased cell-cell interactions. To explore the manifestation of this influence, we used deep unbiased immunoglobulin profiling and systematically characterized the relationships between B cells in circulation, draining lymph nodes (draining LNs), and tumors in 14 patients with three human cancers. We demonstrated that draining LNs are differentially involved in the interaction with the tumor site, and that significant heterogeneity exists even between different parts of a single lymph node (LN). Next, we confirmed and elaborated upon previous observations regarding intratumoral immunoglobulin heterogeneity. We identified B cell receptor (BCR) clonotypes that were expanded in tumors relative to draining LNs and blood and observed that these tumor-expanded clonotypes were less hypermutated than non-expanded (ubiquitous) clonotypes. Furthermore, we observed a shift in the properties of complementarity-determining region 3 of the BCR heavy chain (CDR-H3) towards less mature and less specific BCR repertoire in tumor-infiltrating B-cells compared to circulating B-cells, which may indicate less stringent control for antibody-producing B cell development in tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, we found repertoire-level evidence that B-cells may be selected according to their CDR-H3 physicochemical properties before they activate somatic hypermutation (SHM). Altogether, our work outlines a broad picture of the differences in the tumor BCR repertoire relative to non-tumor tissues and points to the unexpected features of the SHM process.