Structural insights into mRNA reading frame regulation by tRNA modification and slippery codon-anticodon pairing

  1. Eric Hoffer
  2. Samuel Hong
  3. S. Sunita
  4. Tatsuya Maehigashi
  5. Ruben L Gonzalez Jnr
  6. Paul Whitford
  7. Christine M Dunham  Is a corresponding author
  1. Emory University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Columbia University, United States
  3. Northeastern University, United States

Abstract

Modifications in the tRNA anticodon loop, adjacent to the three-nucleotide anticodon, influence translation fidelity by stabilizing the tRNA to allow for accurate reading of the mRNA genetic code. One example is the N1-methylguaonosine modification at guanine nucleotide 37 (m1G37) located in the anticodon loop, immediately adjacent to the anticodon nucleotides 34-36. The absence of m1G37 in tRNAPro causes +1 frameshifting on polynucleotide, slippery codons. Here, we report structures of the bacterial ribosome containing tRNAPro bound to either cognate or slippery codons to determine how the m1G37 modification prevents mRNA frameshifting. The structures reveal that certain codon-anticodon contexts and m1G37 destabilize interactions of tRNAPro with the peptidyl site, causing large conformational changes typically only seen during EF-G mediated translocation of the mRNA-tRNA pairs. These studies provide molecular insights into how m1G37 stabilizes the interactions of tRNAPro with the ribosome and the influence of slippery codons on the mRNA reading frame.

Data availability

Crystallography, atomic coordinates, and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.pdb.org (PDB codes 6NTA, 6NSH, 6NUO, 6NWY, 6O3M, 6OSI)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eric Hoffer

    Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Samuel Hong

    Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. S. Sunita

    Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tatsuya Maehigashi

    Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ruben L Gonzalez Jnr

    Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1344-5581
  6. Paul Whitford

    Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Christine M Dunham

    Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States
    For correspondence
    cmdunha@emory.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8821-688X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01GM093278)

  • Christine M Dunham

National Institutes of Health (R01GM119386)

  • Ruben L Gonzalez

National Science Foundation (MCB-1915843)

  • Paul Whitford

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Alan Brown, Harvard Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: September 16, 2019
  2. Accepted: October 2, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 5, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 21, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Hoffer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,520
    views
  • 352
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eric Hoffer
  2. Samuel Hong
  3. S. Sunita
  4. Tatsuya Maehigashi
  5. Ruben L Gonzalez Jnr
  6. Paul Whitford
  7. Christine M Dunham
(2020)
Structural insights into mRNA reading frame regulation by tRNA modification and slippery codon-anticodon pairing
eLife 9:e51898.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51898

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51898

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.