Abstract

Protein ubiquitination is a very diverse post-translational modification leading to protein degradation or delocalization, or altering protein activity. In Arabidopsis thaliana, two E3 ligases, BIG BROTHER (BB) and DA2, activate the latent peptidases DA1, DAR1 and DAR2 by mono-ubiquitination at multiple sites. Subsequently, these activated peptidases destabilize various positive regulators of growth. Here, we show that two ubiquitin-specific proteases, UBP12 and UBP13, deubiquitinate DA1, DAR1 and DAR2, hence reducing their peptidase activity. Overexpression of UBP12 or UBP13 strongly decreased leaf size and cell area, and resulted in lower ploidy levels. Mutants in which UBP12 and UBP13 were downregulated produced smaller leaves that contained fewer and smaller cells. Remarkably, neither UBP12 nor UBP13 were found to be cleavage substrates of the activated DA1. Our results therefore suggest that UBP12 and UBP13 work upstream of DA1, DAR1 and DAR2 to restrict their protease activity and hence fine-tune plant growth and development.

Data availability

All generated data is included in the data source files

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hannes Vanhaeren

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    For correspondence
    hahae@psb.vib-ugent.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ying Chen

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mattias Vermeersch

    Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB/UGent, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Liesbeth De Milde

    Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB/UGent, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Valerie De Vleeschhauwer

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Annelore Natran

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Geert Persiau

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Dominique Eeckhout

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Geert De Jaeger

    Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB/UGent, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kris Gevaert

    VIB Center for Medical Biotechnology, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, VIB/UGent, Ghent, Belgium
    For correspondence
    kris.gevaert@vib-ugent.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Dirk Inzé

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    For correspondence
    dirk.inze@psb.vib-ugent.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3217-8407

Funding

Ghent University Bijzonder Onderzoeksfondsen (BOF08/01M00408)

  • Mattias Vermeersch

Ghent University Bijzonder Onderzoeksfondsen (01SC3117)

  • Ying Chen

Chinese Scholarship Council (201604910566)

  • Ying Chen

Research Foundation Flanders (12V0218N)

  • Hannes Vanhaeren

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Vanhaeren et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,102
    views
  • 707
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hannes Vanhaeren
  2. Ying Chen
  3. Mattias Vermeersch
  4. Liesbeth De Milde
  5. Valerie De Vleeschhauwer
  6. Annelore Natran
  7. Geert Persiau
  8. Dominique Eeckhout
  9. Geert De Jaeger
  10. Kris Gevaert
  11. Dirk Inzé
(2020)
UBP12 and UBP13 negatively regulate the activity of the ubiquitin-dependent peptidases DA1, DAR1 and DAR2
eLife 9:e52276.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52276

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52276

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Masanori Izumi, Sakuya Nakamura ... Shinya Hagihara
    Research Article

    Plants distribute many nutrients to chloroplasts during leaf development and maturation. When leaves senesce or experience sugar starvation, the autophagy machinery degrades chloroplast proteins to facilitate efficient nutrient reuse. Here, we report on the intracellular dynamics of an autophagy pathway responsible for piecemeal degradation of chloroplast components. Through live-cell monitoring of chloroplast morphology, we observed the formation of chloroplast budding structures in sugar-starved leaves. These buds were then released and incorporated into the vacuolar lumen as an autophagic cargo termed a Rubisco-containing body. The budding structures did not accumulate in mutants of core autophagy machinery, suggesting that autophagosome creation is required for forming chloroplast buds. Simultaneous tracking of chloroplast morphology and autophagosome development revealed that the isolation membranes of autophagosomes interact closely with part of the chloroplast surface before forming chloroplast buds. Chloroplasts then protrude at the site associated with the isolation membranes, which divide synchronously with autophagosome maturation. This autophagy-related division does not require DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN 5B, which constitutes the division ring for chloroplast proliferation in growing leaves. An unidentified division machinery may thus fragment chloroplasts for degradation in coordination with the development of the chloroplast-associated isolation membrane.

    1. Plant Biology
    Koji Kato, Yoshiki Nakajima ... Ryo Nagao
    Research Article

    Photosynthetic organisms exhibit remarkable diversity in their light-harvesting complexes (LHCs). LHCs are associated with photosystem I (PSI), forming a PSI-LHCI supercomplex. The number of LHCI subunits, along with their protein sequences and pigment compositions, has been found to differ greatly among the PSI-LHCI structures. However, the mechanisms by which LHCIs recognize their specific binding sites within the PSI core remain unclear. In this study, we determined the cryo-electron microscopy structure of a PSI supercomplex incorporating fucoxanthin chlorophyll a/c-binding proteins (FCPs), designated as PSI-FCPI, isolated from the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana CCMP1335. Structural analysis of PSI-FCPI revealed five FCPI subunits associated with a PSI monomer; these subunits were identified as RedCAP, Lhcr3, Lhcq10, Lhcf10, and Lhcq8. Through structural and sequence analyses, we identified specific protein–protein interactions at the interfaces between FCPI and PSI subunits, as well as among FCPI subunits themselves. Comparative structural analyses of PSI-FCPI supercomplexes, combined with phylogenetic analysis of FCPs from T. pseudonana and the diatom Chaetoceros gracilis, underscore the evolutionary conservation of protein motifs crucial for the selective binding of individual FCPI subunits. These findings provide significant insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the assembly and selective binding of FCPIs in diatoms.