Abstract

Protein ubiquitination is a very diverse post-translational modification leading to protein degradation or delocalization, or altering protein activity. In Arabidopsis thaliana, two E3 ligases, BIG BROTHER (BB) and DA2, activate the latent peptidases DA1, DAR1 and DAR2 by mono-ubiquitination at multiple sites. Subsequently, these activated peptidases destabilize various positive regulators of growth. Here, we show that two ubiquitin-specific proteases, UBP12 and UBP13, deubiquitinate DA1, DAR1 and DAR2, hence reducing their peptidase activity. Overexpression of UBP12 or UBP13 strongly decreased leaf size and cell area, and resulted in lower ploidy levels. Mutants in which UBP12 and UBP13 were downregulated produced smaller leaves that contained fewer and smaller cells. Remarkably, neither UBP12 nor UBP13 were found to be cleavage substrates of the activated DA1. Our results therefore suggest that UBP12 and UBP13 work upstream of DA1, DAR1 and DAR2 to restrict their protease activity and hence fine-tune plant growth and development.

Data availability

All generated data is included in the data source files

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hannes Vanhaeren

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    For correspondence
    hahae@psb.vib-ugent.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ying Chen

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mattias Vermeersch

    Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB/UGent, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Liesbeth De Milde

    Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB/UGent, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Valerie De Vleeschhauwer

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Annelore Natran

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Geert Persiau

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Dominique Eeckhout

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Geert De Jaeger

    Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB/UGent, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kris Gevaert

    VIB Center for Medical Biotechnology, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, VIB/UGent, Ghent, Belgium
    For correspondence
    kris.gevaert@vib-ugent.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Dirk Inzé

    VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, VIB/UGent, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    For correspondence
    dirk.inze@psb.vib-ugent.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3217-8407

Funding

Ghent University Bijzonder Onderzoeksfondsen (BOF08/01M00408)

  • Mattias Vermeersch

Ghent University Bijzonder Onderzoeksfondsen (01SC3117)

  • Ying Chen

Chinese Scholarship Council (201604910566)

  • Ying Chen

Research Foundation Flanders (12V0218N)

  • Hannes Vanhaeren

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Vanhaeren et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52276

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Théo Le Moigne, Martina Santoni ... Julien Henri
    Research Article

    The Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle (CBBC) performs carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms. Among the eleven enzymes that participate in the pathway, sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase) is expressed in photo-autotrophs and catalyzes the hydrolysis of sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate (SBP) to sedoheptulose-7-phosphate (S7P). SBPase, along with nine other enzymes in the CBBC, contributes to the regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, the carbon-fixing co-substrate used by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). The metabolic role of SBPase is restricted to the CBBC, and a recent study revealed that the three-dimensional structure of SBPase from the moss Physcomitrium patens was found to be similar to that of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), an enzyme involved in both CBBC and neoglucogenesis. In this study we report the first structure of an SBPase from a chlorophyte, the model unicellular green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. By combining experimental and computational structural analyses, we describe the topology, conformations, and quaternary structure of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii SBPase (CrSBPase). We identify active site residues and locate sites of redox- and phospho-post-translational modifications that contribute to enzymatic functions. Finally, we observe that CrSBPase adopts distinct oligomeric states that may dynamically contribute to the control of its activity.

    1. Plant Biology
    Maryam Rahmati Ishka, Hayley Sussman ... Magdalena M Julkowska
    Research Article

    Soil salinity is one of the major threats to agricultural productivity worldwide. Salt stress exposure alters root and shoots growth rates, thereby affecting overall plant performance. While past studies have extensively documented the effect of salt stress on root elongation and shoot development separately, here we take an innovative approach by examining the coordination of root and shoot growth under salt stress conditions. Utilizing a newly developed tool for quantifying the root:shoot ratio in agar-grown Arabidopsis seedlings, we found that salt stress results in a loss of coordination between root and shoot growth rates. We identify a specific gene cluster encoding domain-of-unknown-function 247 (DUF247), and characterize one of these genes as Salt Root:shoot Ratio Regulator Gene (SR3G). Further analysis elucidates the role of SR3G as a negative regulator of salt stress tolerance, revealing its function in regulating shoot growth, root suberization, and sodium accumulation. We further characterize that SR3G expression is modulated by WRKY75 transcription factor, known as a positive regulator of salt stress tolerance. Finally, we show that the salt stress sensitivity of wrky75 mutant is completely diminished when it is combined with sr3g mutation. Together, our results demonstrate that utilizing root:shoot ratio as an architectural feature leads to the discovery of a new stress resilience gene. The study’s innovative approach and findings not only contribute to our understanding of plant stress tolerance mechanisms but also open new avenues for genetic and agronomic strategies to enhance crop environmental resilience.