Postural control of arm and fingers through integration of movement commands
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States
- Columbia University Medical Center, United States
- Newcastle University, United Kingdom
Abstract
Every movement ends in a period of stillness. Current models assume that commands that hold the limb at a target location do not depend on the commands that moved the limb to that location. Here, we report a surprising relationship between movement and posture in primates: on a within-trial basis, the commands that hold the arm and finger at a target location depend on the mathematical integration of the commands that moved the limb to that location. Following damage to the corticospinal tract, both the move and hold period commands become more variable. However, the hold period commands retain their dependence on the integral of the move period commands. Thus, our data suggest that the postural controller possesses a feedforward module that uses move commands to calculate a component of hold commands. This computation may arise within an unknown subcortical system that integrates cortical commands to stabilize limb posture.
Data availability
Source data files generated or analyzed during this study are included for Figures 1-7 and have also been deposited in OSF under accession code YC64A.
-
Postural control of arm and fingers through integration of movement commands.Open Science Framework, doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/YC64A.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS078311)
- Reza Shadmehr
Sheikh Khalifa Stroke Institute
- John W Krakauer
Medical Research Council (MR/K023012/1)
- Demetris S Soteropoulos
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1DP2NS083037)
- Mark M Churchland
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS100066)
- Mark M Churchland
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1U19NS104649)
- Mark M Churchland
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F31NS095706)
- Scott T Albert
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32NS092350)
- Mark M Churchland
National Science Foundation (1723967)
- Reza Shadmehr
Simons Foundation (SCGB#542957)
- Mark M Churchland
Medical Research Council (MR/P023967)
- Stuart N Baker
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All animal procedures in the U.S. were conducted in accord with the US National Institutes of Health guidelines and were approved by the Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (AC-AAAQ7409). These data were originally published in Lara, Cunningham, & Churchland (2018) as well as Lara, Elsayed, Zimnik, Cunningham, & Churchland (2018). All procedures in the U.K. were carried out under appropriate UK Home Office licenses in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, and were approved by the Local Research Ethics Committee of Newcastle University. These data were originally published in Soteropoulos, Williams, & Baker (2012).
Human subjects: Informed consent was obtained from all participants. All human subjects work was approved by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Institutional Review Board, protocol number NA_00037510.
Copyright
© 2020, Albert et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 4,137
- views
-
- 639
- downloads
-
- 40
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Postural control of arm and fingers through integration of movement commands
eLife 9:e52507.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52507
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
The unexpected absence of danger constitutes a pleasurable event that is critical for the learning of safety. Accumulating evidence points to similarities between the processing of absent threat and the well-established reward prediction error (PE). However, clear-cut evidence for this analogy in humans is scarce. In line with recent animal data, we showed that the unexpected omission of (painful) electrical stimulation triggers activations within key regions of the reward and salience pathways and that these activations correlate with the pleasantness of the reported relief. Furthermore, by parametrically violating participants’ probability and intensity related expectations of the upcoming stimulation, we showed for the first time in humans that omission-related activations in the VTA/SN were stronger following omissions of more probable and intense stimulations, like a positive reward PE signal. Together, our findings provide additional support for an overlap in the neural processing of absent danger and rewards in humans.
-
- Neuroscience
Investigators conducting behavioral experiments often need precise control over the timing of the delivery of stimuli to subjects and to collect precise times of subsequent behavioral responses. Furthermore, investigators want fine-tuned control over how various multi-modal cues are presented. behaviorMate takes an ‘Intranet of Things’ approach, using a networked system of hardware and software components for achieving these goals. The system outputs a file with integrated timestamp–event pairs that investigators can then format and process using their own analysis pipelines. We present an overview of the electronic components and GUI application that make up behaviorMate as well as mechanical designs for compatible experimental rigs to provide the reader with the ability to set up their own system. A wide variety of paradigms are supported, including goal-oriented learning, random foraging, and context switching. We demonstrate behaviorMate’s utility and reliability with a range of use cases from several published studies and benchmark tests. Finally, we present experimental validation demonstrating different modalities of hippocampal place field studies. Both treadmill with burlap belt and virtual reality with running wheel paradigms were performed to confirm the efficacy and flexibility of the approach. Previous solutions rely on proprietary systems that may have large upfront costs or present frameworks that require customized software to be developed. behaviorMate uses open-source software and a flexible configuration system to mitigate both concerns. behaviorMate has a proven record for head-fixed imaging experiments and could be easily adopted for task control in a variety of experimental situations.
