Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy leads to tuberculosis reactivation via dysregulation of TNF-α

  1. Liku B Tezera  Is a corresponding author
  2. Magdalena K Bielecka
  3. Paul Ogongo
  4. Naomi F Walker
  5. Matthew Ellis
  6. Diana J Garay-Baquero
  7. Kristian Thomas
  8. Michaela T Reichmann
  9. David A Johnston
  10. Katalin Andrea Wilkinson
  11. Mohamed Ahmed
  12. Sanjay Jogai
  13. Suwan N Jayasinghe
  14. Robert J Wilkinson
  15. Salah Mansour
  16. Gareth J Thomas
  17. Christian H Ottensmeier
  18. Alasdair Leslie
  19. Paul T Elkington
  1. University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  2. Africa Health Research Institute, South Africa
  3. Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
  4. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  5. African Health Research Institute, South Africa
  6. University College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Previously, we developed a 3-dimensional cell culture model of human tuberculosis (TB) and demonstrated its potential to interrogate the host-pathogen interaction (Tezera et al, 2017). Here, we use the model to investigate mechanisms whereby immune checkpoint therapy for cancer paradoxically activates TB infection. In patients, PD-1 is expressed in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb)-infected lung tissue but absent in areas of immunopathology. In the microsphere model, PD-1 ligands are up-regulated by infection, and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is further induced by hypoxia. Inhibition of PD-1 signalling increases Mtb growth, and augments cytokine secretion. TNF-α is responsible for accelerated Mtb growth, and TNF-α neutralisation reverses augmented Mtb growth caused by anti-PD-1 treatment. In human TB, pulmonary TNF-α immunoreactivity is increased and circulating PD-1 expression negatively correlates with sputum TNF-α concentrations. Together, our findings demonstrate that PD-1 regulates the immune response in TB, and inhibition of PD-1 accelerates Mtb growth via excessive TNF-α secretion.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for for all figures as a data resource file

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Liku B Tezera

    NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    l.tezera@soton.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7898-6709
  2. Magdalena K Bielecka

    NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Paul Ogongo

    Laboratory Science, Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0093-5768
  4. Naomi F Walker

    Medicine, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Matthew Ellis

    Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Diana J Garay-Baquero

    Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9450-8504
  7. Kristian Thomas

    Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Michaela T Reichmann

    Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6714-8400
  9. David A Johnston

    Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Katalin Andrea Wilkinson

    Tuberculosis Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9796-2040
  11. Mohamed Ahmed

    African Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Sanjay Jogai

    NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Suwan N Jayasinghe

    BioPhysics Group, UCL Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Robert J Wilkinson

    Tuberculosis laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Salah Mansour

    NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5982-734X
  16. Gareth J Thomas

    Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3832-7335
  17. Christian H Ottensmeier

    CRUK and NIHR Experimental Cancer Medicine Center, Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3619-1657
  18. Alasdair Leslie

    African Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Paul T Elkington

    NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0390-0613

Funding

Medical Research Council (MR/P023754/1)

  • Paul T Elkington

Medical Research Council (MR/N006631/1)

  • Paul T Elkington

Wessex Medical Research (Innovation Grant 2017)

  • Liku B Tezera

Wellcome Trust (210662/Z/18/Z)

  • Alasdair Leslie

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Bree Aldridge, Tufts University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: All ethical approvals were in place from the appropriate regulatory organisations in both the UK and South Africa, as cited in the methods

Version history

  1. Received: October 17, 2019
  2. Accepted: February 19, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 24, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 5, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Tezera et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,416
    views
  • 682
    downloads
  • 73
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Liku B Tezera
  2. Magdalena K Bielecka
  3. Paul Ogongo
  4. Naomi F Walker
  5. Matthew Ellis
  6. Diana J Garay-Baquero
  7. Kristian Thomas
  8. Michaela T Reichmann
  9. David A Johnston
  10. Katalin Andrea Wilkinson
  11. Mohamed Ahmed
  12. Sanjay Jogai
  13. Suwan N Jayasinghe
  14. Robert J Wilkinson
  15. Salah Mansour
  16. Gareth J Thomas
  17. Christian H Ottensmeier
  18. Alasdair Leslie
  19. Paul T Elkington
(2020)
Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy leads to tuberculosis reactivation via dysregulation of TNF-α
eLife 9:e52668.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52668

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52668

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.