1. Medicine
  2. Immunology and Inflammation
Download icon

Sepsis: Modelling survival

  1. Teresa A Zimmers  Is a corresponding author
  2. Leonidas G Koniaris
  1. Indiana University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Indiana University, United States
  3. Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, United States
Insight
  • Cited 1
  • Views 907
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e52959 doi: 10.7554/eLife.52959

Abstract

A new mouse model of sepsis can reproduce the long-term muscle weakness seen in patients who survive this life-threatening illness.

Main text

Sepsis arises when the immune system produces an overwhelming response to an infection, which can lead to widespread blood clotting, shock (i.e., too little oxygen being delivered to tissues), multiple organ failure and, if left untreated, death. There are an estimated 31.5 million cases of sepsis worldwide per year (Fleischmann et al., 2016). Millions of children and newborns are affected by sepsis, and one-in-ten maternal deaths and half of all hospital deaths are due to this condition (Fleischmann-Struzek et al., 2018). The majority of hospital deaths occur in elderly patients suffering severe, chronic diseases such as cancer that predispose them to developing this life-threatening illness (Singer et al., 2019). It’s not only vulnerable people who are susceptible to sepsis, even healthy individuals suffering a new injury or infection can die from this condition. However, the number of patients dying from sepsis in the US and other economically developed nations is declining due to patients receiving earlier diagnosis and intensive care.

Although acute sepsis treatment has led to more survivors, it has become increasingly apparent that the life-threatening effects of sepsis do not end once a patient leaves the hospital (Fleischmann et al., 2016). In fact, patients have an elevated risk of mortality for at least two years following treatment (Prescott et al., 2016), and more than 20% of survivors will die within a year (Brakenridge et al., 2019). Even healthy individuals who survive sepsis rarely return to normal function (Prescott and Angus, 2018a; Prescott and Costa, 2018b). The underlying cause of this post-sepsis deterioration and late mortality is partly due to the body being weakened by the sepsis response, by the life-saving drugs administered to treat the sepsis, and by having reduced mobility when in intensive care. This leads to muscle wasting, as well as loss of muscle strength and performance. Eventually muscle mass recovers, but muscle strength does not, and this can leave a profound and lasting impact on survivors.

To understand how to treat these long-term effects researchers need an experimental model that can replicate these symptoms. Multiple rodent models are used to study the acute sepsis response by infecting their skin or tissue, by surgically puncturing their intestine, or by injecting bacterial toxins, bacteria or fecal preparations (Lewis et al., 2016). These models can be used to study how the body responds to infection and identify potential interventions that could reduce the rate of death in the short-term. However, there are very few models available for studying the later effects of sepsis. An ideal model would need to resemble an injury seen in patients; include interventions that mimic modern medical care, such as antibiotics and support for damaged organs; be able to clear the infection, recover and survive; and support long-term studies and functional analysis. Now, in eLife, Hiroshi Saito and co-workers at the University of Kentucky, Harvard Medical School and the University of Florida – including Allison Owen as first author – report a mouse model that meets all of these requirements (Owen et al., 2019Figure 1).

A mouse model for studying sepsis survival.

Sepsis is a life-threatening illness that occurs when the immune system overreacts to an injury or infection. Patients with early diagnosis of sepsis who are treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) have a much greater chance of survival (green arrow). However, a significant number of survivors suffer from long-term debilitating effects (blue arrow) and late mortality (red arrow). To better understand how to treat these long-term effects, Owen et al. have developed a mouse model that replicates the treatment outcomes of patients who had survived sepsis: 16-month-old mice were given an injury that induced sepsis and then given the same fluids and drugs patients would receive when in the ICU. These mice exhibited the long-term muscle weakness that commonly occurs in sepsis survivors.

Image credit: Icons are copyright of Greyjj/Dreamstime.com.

Unlike typical mouse studies that use young or adolescent mice, Owen et al. used 16-month-old mice which are the equivalent of middle-aged humans (age 50 years). To mimic the disease process seen in intestinal conditions (such as severe appendicitis), a fecal bacterial suspension was injected into the mice’s abdominal cavity. These bacteria were rapidly absorbed into the body and the mice quickly developed sepsis with blood-borne bacteria. After a 12 hour period of illness without intervention (to mimic worsening disease), the mice were given fluids and antibiotics to simulate the care received by patients when in intensive care. This rescue protocol treated the sepsis, shock, and organ injury over the next five days and improved the survival rate of mice from 0–14% to 75%.

The mice that survived sepsis demonstrated a large and persistent loss of strength. Both male and female mice lost 30–35% of their muscle strength two weeks after becoming infected with sepsis, even when accounting for loss in muscle size. This weakness lasted a month, even once muscle mass had returned and all evidence of infection and inflammation had disappeared. Owen et al. found that this weakness was not the result of low food intake, but due to damage to mitochondria in the mice’s skeletal muscle cells.

The main role of mitochondria is to provide cells with energy, so it is possible that the damaged mitochondria cannot produce enough energy for muscle contraction, and their faulty metabolism may even perpetuate further cell damage. One could speculate that therapies that protect mitochondria during anti-sepsis treatment, or drugs that re-habilitate damaged mitochondria, could prevent or reduce the functional decline in sepsis survivors.

This model of sepsis survival should stimulate new research not only into acquired weakness, but also into the cognitive, emotional and physical impairments sepsis survivors face following intensive care (Inoue et al., 2019). Careful molecular and cellular studies using this mouse model could identify new therapeutic targets and interventions that improve the long-term outcomes of sepsis survivors.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Teresa A Zimmers

    Teresa A Zimmers is in the Department of Surgery, Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Otolaryngology, the Simon Cancer Center, and the Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, and the Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Center for Cachexia Research, Innovation and Therapy, Indianapolis, United States

    For correspondence
    zimmerst@iu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7872-0540
  2. Leonidas G Koniaris

    Leonidas G Koniaris is in the Department of Surgery, the Simon Cancer Center, and the Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, and the Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Center for Cachexia Research, Innovation and Therapy, Indianapolis, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: December 10, 2019 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2019, Zimmers and Koniaris

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 907
    Page views
  • 110
    Downloads
  • 1
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    Joseph D Butner et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Background:

    Checkpoint inhibitor therapy of cancer has led to markedly improved survival of a subset of patients in multiple solid malignant tumor types, yet the factors driving these clinical responses or lack thereof are not known. We have developed a mechanistic mathematical model for better understanding these factors and their relations in order to predict treatment outcome and optimize personal treatment strategies.

    Methods:

    Here, we present a translational mathematical model dependent on three key parameters for describing efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in human cancer: tumor growth rate (α), tumor-immune infiltration (Λ), and immunotherapy-mediated amplification of anti-tumor response (µ). The model was calibrated by fitting it to a compiled clinical tumor response dataset (n = 189 patients) obtained from published anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 clinical trials, and then validated on an additional validation cohort (n = 64 patients) obtained from our in-house clinical trials.

    Results:

    The derived parameters Λ and µ were both significantly different between responding versus nonresponding patients. Of note, our model appropriately classified response in 81.4% of patients by using only tumor volume measurements and within 2 months of treatment initiation in a retrospective analysis. The model reliably predicted clinical response to the PD-1/PD-L1 class of checkpoint inhibitors across multiple solid malignant tumor types. Comparison of model parameters to immunohistochemical measurement of PD-L1 and CD8+ T cells confirmed robust relationships between model parameters and their underlying biology.

    Conclusions:

    These results have demonstrated reliable methods to inform model parameters directly from biopsy samples, which are conveniently obtainable as early as the start of treatment. Together, these suggest that the model parameters may serve as early and robust biomarkers of the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor therapy on an individualized per-patient basis.

    Funding:

    We gratefully acknowledge support from the Andrew Sabin Family Fellowship, Center for Radiation Oncology Research, Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare, and institutional funds from the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. We have also received Cancer Center Support Grants from the National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672 to the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and P30CA072720 the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey). This research has also been supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation Grant DMS-1930583 (ZW, VC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1R01CA253865 (ZW, VC), 1U01CA196403 (ZW, VC), 1U01CA213759 (ZW, VC), 1R01CA226537 (ZW, RP, WA, VC), 1R01CA222007 (ZW, VC), U54CA210181 (ZW, VC), and the University of Texas System STARS Award (VC). BC acknowledges support through the SER Cymru II Programme, funded by the European Commission through the Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) COFUND scheme and the Welsh European Funding Office (WEFO) under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). EK has also received support from the Project Purple, NIH (U54CA210181, U01CA200468, and U01CA196403), and the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (16-65-SING). MF was supported through NIH/NCI center grant U54CA210181, R01CA222959, DoD Breast Cancer Research Breakthrough Level IV Award W81XWH-17-1-0389, and the Ernest Cockrell Jr. Presidential Distinguished Chair at Houston Methodist Research Institute. RP and WA received serial research awards from AngelWorks, the Gillson-Longenbaugh Foundation, and the Marcus Foundation. This work was also supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute to SHC (R01CA109322, R01CA127483, R01CA208703, and U54CA210181 CITO pilot grant) and to PYP (R01CA140243, R01CA188610, and U54CA210181 CITO pilot grant). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Balazs Aczel et al.
    Feature Article Updated

    Any large dataset can be analyzed in a number of ways, and it is possible that the use of different analysis strategies will lead to different results and conclusions. One way to assess whether the results obtained depend on the analysis strategy chosen is to employ multiple analysts and leave each of them free to follow their own approach. Here, we present consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting such multi-analyst studies, and we discuss how broader adoption of the multi-analyst approach has the potential to strengthen the robustness of results and conclusions obtained from analyses of datasets in basic and applied research.