A new mouse model of sepsis can reproduce the long-term muscle weakness seen in patients who survive this life-threatening illness.
Sepsis arises when the immune system produces an overwhelming response to an infection, which can lead to widespread blood clotting, shock (i.e., too little oxygen being delivered to tissues), multiple organ failure and, if left untreated, death. There are an estimated 31.5 million cases of sepsis worldwide per year (Fleischmann et al., 2016). Millions of children and newborns are affected by sepsis, and one-in-ten maternal deaths and half of all hospital deaths are due to this condition (Fleischmann-Struzek et al., 2018). The majority of hospital deaths occur in elderly patients suffering severe, chronic diseases such as cancer that predispose them to developing this life-threatening illness (Singer et al., 2019). It’s not only vulnerable people who are susceptible to sepsis, even healthy individuals suffering a new injury or infection can die from this condition. However, the number of patients dying from sepsis in the US and other economically developed nations is declining due to patients receiving earlier diagnosis and intensive care.
Although acute sepsis treatment has led to more survivors, it has become increasingly apparent that the life-threatening effects of sepsis do not end once a patient leaves the hospital (Fleischmann et al., 2016). In fact, patients have an elevated risk of mortality for at least two years following treatment (Prescott et al., 2016), and more than 20% of survivors will die within a year (Brakenridge et al., 2019). Even healthy individuals who survive sepsis rarely return to normal function (Prescott and Angus, 2018a; Prescott and Costa, 2018b). The underlying cause of this post-sepsis deterioration and late mortality is partly due to the body being weakened by the sepsis response, by the life-saving drugs administered to treat the sepsis, and by having reduced mobility when in intensive care. This leads to muscle wasting, as well as loss of muscle strength and performance. Eventually muscle mass recovers, but muscle strength does not, and this can leave a profound and lasting impact on survivors.
To understand how to treat these long-term effects researchers need an experimental model that can replicate these symptoms. Multiple rodent models are used to study the acute sepsis response by infecting their skin or tissue, by surgically puncturing their intestine, or by injecting bacterial toxins, bacteria or fecal preparations (Lewis et al., 2016). These models can be used to study how the body responds to infection and identify potential interventions that could reduce the rate of death in the short-term. However, there are very few models available for studying the later effects of sepsis. An ideal model would need to resemble an injury seen in patients; include interventions that mimic modern medical care, such as antibiotics and support for damaged organs; be able to clear the infection, recover and survive; and support long-term studies and functional analysis. Now, in eLife, Hiroshi Saito and co-workers at the University of Kentucky, Harvard Medical School and the University of Florida – including Allison Owen as first author – report a mouse model that meets all of these requirements (Owen et al., 2019; Figure 1).
Unlike typical mouse studies that use young or adolescent mice, Owen et al. used 16-month-old mice which are the equivalent of middle-aged humans (age 50 years). To mimic the disease process seen in intestinal conditions (such as severe appendicitis), a fecal bacterial suspension was injected into the mice’s abdominal cavity. These bacteria were rapidly absorbed into the body and the mice quickly developed sepsis with blood-borne bacteria. After a 12 hour period of illness without intervention (to mimic worsening disease), the mice were given fluids and antibiotics to simulate the care received by patients when in intensive care. This rescue protocol treated the sepsis, shock, and organ injury over the next five days and improved the survival rate of mice from 0–14% to 75%.
The mice that survived sepsis demonstrated a large and persistent loss of strength. Both male and female mice lost 30–35% of their muscle strength two weeks after becoming infected with sepsis, even when accounting for loss in muscle size. This weakness lasted a month, even once muscle mass had returned and all evidence of infection and inflammation had disappeared. Owen et al. found that this weakness was not the result of low food intake, but due to damage to mitochondria in the mice’s skeletal muscle cells.
The main role of mitochondria is to provide cells with energy, so it is possible that the damaged mitochondria cannot produce enough energy for muscle contraction, and their faulty metabolism may even perpetuate further cell damage. One could speculate that therapies that protect mitochondria during anti-sepsis treatment, or drugs that re-habilitate damaged mitochondria, could prevent or reduce the functional decline in sepsis survivors.
This model of sepsis survival should stimulate new research not only into acquired weakness, but also into the cognitive, emotional and physical impairments sepsis survivors face following intensive care (Inoue et al., 2019). Careful molecular and cellular studies using this mouse model could identify new therapeutic targets and interventions that improve the long-term outcomes of sepsis survivors.
Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitationsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 193:259–272.https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC
The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: a systematic reviewThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine 6:223–230.https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30063-8
Post-intensive care syndrome: its pathophysiology, prevention, and future directionsAcute Medicine & Surgery 6:233–246.https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.415
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Obesity and diabetes are established comorbidities for COVID-19. Adipose tissue demonstrates high expression of ACE2 which SARS- CoV-2 exploits to enter host cells. This makes adipose tissue a reservoir for SARS-CoV-2 viruses and thus increases the integral viral load. Acute viral infection results in ACE2 downregulation. This relative deficiency can lead to disturbances in other systems controlled by ACE2, including the renin-angiotensin system. This will be further increased in the case of pre-conditions with already compromised functioning of these systems, such as in patients with obesity and diabetes. Here, we propose that interactions of virally-induced ACE2 deficiency with obesity and/or diabetes leads to a synergistic further impairment of endothelial and gut barrier function. The appearance of bacteria and/or their products in the lungs of obese and diabetic patients promotes interactions between viral and bacterial pathogens, resulting in a more severe lung injury in COVID-19.
Deep learning in in-vitro fertilization is currently being evaluated in the development of assistive tools for the determination of transfer order and implantation potential using time-lapse data collected through expensive imaging hardware. Assistive tools and algorithms that can work with static images, however, can help in improving the access to care by enabling their use with images acquired from traditional microscopes that are available to virtually all fertility centers. Here, we evaluated the use of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN), trained using single timepoint images of embryos collected at 113 hours post-insemination, in embryo selection amongst 97 clinical patient cohorts (742 embryos) and observed an accuracy of 90% in choosing the highest quality embryo available. Furthermore, a CNN trained to assess an embryo’s implantation potential directly using a set of 97 euploid embryos capable of implantation outperformed 15 trained embryologists (75.26% vs. 67.35%, P<0.0001) from 5 different fertility centers.