Cross-species cortical alignment identifies different types of anatomical reorganization in the primate temporal lobe

  1. Nicole Eichert  Is a corresponding author
  2. Emma C Robinson
  3. Katherine L Bryant
  4. Saad Jbabdi
  5. Mark Jenkinson
  6. Longchuan Li
  7. Kristine Krug
  8. Kate E Watkins
  9. Rogier B Mars
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. King's College London, United Kingdom
  3. Emory University, United States
  4. Radboud Universiteit, Netherlands

Abstract

Evolutionary adaptations of temporo-parietal cortex are considered to be a critical specialization of the human brain. Cortical adaptations, however, can affect different aspects of brain architecture, including local expansion of the cortical sheet or changes in connectivity between cortical areas. We distinguish different types of changes in brain architecture using a computational neuroanatomy approach. We investigate the extent to which between-species alignment, based on cortical myelin, can predict changes in connectivity patterns across macaque, chimpanzee, and human. We show that expansion and relocation of brain areas can predict terminations of several white matter tracts in temporo-parietal cortex, including the middle and superior longitudinal fasciculus, but not the arcuate fasciculus. This demonstrates that the arcuate fasciculus underwent additional evolutionary modifications affecting the temporal lobe connectivity pattern. This approach can flexibly be extended to include other features of cortical organization and other species, allowing direct tests of comparative hypotheses of brain organization.

Data availability

This study used previously published datasets and availability of source data for the different data sets is provided in an overview table in the main manuscript ('Data Availability Overview'). The anonymised human MRI dataset that was generated for the present study is available via OpenNeuro under the accession code ds002634 (version 1.0.1). The results scene files have been made available from the Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging's GitLab at git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/neichert/project_MSM. Group-level myelin-maps and tract surface maps of the three species will be openly accessible as part of the results scene files. Numerical data underlying Figure 5 and Appendix 3 - Figure 2 are provided as Source Data with the article. All further derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicole Eichert

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    nicole.eichert@psy.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7818-5787
  2. Emma C Robinson

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Katherine L Bryant

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Saad Jbabdi

    Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Mark Jenkinson

    Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6043-0166
  6. Longchuan Li

    Marcus Autism Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Kristine Krug

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Kristine Krug, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7119-9350
  8. Kate E Watkins

    Department of Experimental Pschology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2621-482X
  9. Rogier B Mars

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Wellcome (203730/Z/16/Z)

  • Nicole Eichert

Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship (750026)

  • Katherine L Bryant

Medical Research Council (MR/L009013/1)

  • Saad Jbabdi

National Institute for Health Research

  • Mark Jenkinson

Oxford Biomedical Research Centre

  • Mark Jenkinson

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/H016902/1)

  • Kristine Krug

Wellcome (101092/Z/13/Z)

  • Kristine Krug

Other (R01MH118534)

  • Longchuan Li

Other (P50MH100029)

  • Longchuan Li

Other (R01MH118285)

  • Longchuan Li

Wellcome (203139/Z/16/Z)

  • Rogier B Mars

NIHR Oxford Heath Biomedical Research Centre

  • Rogier B Mars

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N019814/1)

  • Rogier B Mars

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (452-13-015)

  • Rogier B Mars

Academy of Medical Sciences

  • Emma C Robinson

British Heart Foundation

  • Emma C Robinson

Government Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

  • Emma C Robinson

Wellcome (SBF003\1116)

  • Emma C Robinson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Timothy Verstynen, Carnegie Mellon University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Chimpanzee data:Data were acquired at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center (YNPRC) at Emory University through separate studies covered by animal research protocols approved by YNPRC and the Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approval no. YER-2001206). These chimpanzee MRI scans were obtained from a data archive of scans obtained prior to the 2015 implementation of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Institutes of Health regulations governing research with chimpanzees. All the scans reported in this publication were completed by the end of 2012.Macaque Data:Procedures of the in vivo macaque data acquisition were carried out in accordance with Home Office (UK) Regulations and European Union guidelines (EU directive 86/609/EEC; EU Directive 2010/63/EU).

Human subjects: The study was approved by the Central University (of Oxford) Research Ethics Committee (CUREC, R55787/RE001) in accordance with the regulatory standards of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). All participants gave informed consent to their participation and were monetarily compensated for their participation.

Version history

  1. Received: October 31, 2019
  2. Accepted: March 19, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 23, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 23, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Eichert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,867
    views
  • 436
    downloads
  • 64
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nicole Eichert
  2. Emma C Robinson
  3. Katherine L Bryant
  4. Saad Jbabdi
  5. Mark Jenkinson
  6. Longchuan Li
  7. Kristine Krug
  8. Kate E Watkins
  9. Rogier B Mars
(2020)
Cross-species cortical alignment identifies different types of anatomical reorganization in the primate temporal lobe
eLife 9:e53232.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53232

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53232

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Geoffroy Delamare, Yosif Zaki ... Claudia Clopath
    Short Report

    Representational drift refers to the dynamic nature of neural representations in the brain despite the behavior being seemingly stable. Although drift has been observed in many different brain regions, the mechanisms underlying it are not known. Since intrinsic neural excitability is suggested to play a key role in regulating memory allocation, fluctuations of excitability could bias the reactivation of previously stored memory ensembles and therefore act as a motor for drift. Here, we propose a rate-based plastic recurrent neural network with slow fluctuations of intrinsic excitability. We first show that subsequent reactivations of a neural ensemble can lead to drift of this ensemble. The model predicts that drift is induced by co-activation of previously active neurons along with neurons with high excitability which leads to remodeling of the recurrent weights. Consistent with previous experimental works, the drifting ensemble is informative about its temporal history. Crucially, we show that the gradual nature of the drift is necessary for decoding temporal information from the activity of the ensemble. Finally, we show that the memory is preserved and can be decoded by an output neuron having plastic synapses with the main region.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Alexandra Stavsky, Leonardo A Parra-Rivas ... Daniel Gitler
    Short Report

    The cytosolic proteins synucleins and synapsins are thought to play cooperative roles in regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) recycling, but mechanistic insight is lacking. Here, we identify the synapsin E-domain as an essential functional binding-partner of α-synuclein (α-syn). Synapsin E-domain allows α-syn functionality, binds to α-syn, and is necessary and sufficient for enabling effects of α-syn at synapses of cultured mouse hippocampal neurons. Together with previous studies implicating the E-domain in clustering SVs, our experiments advocate a cooperative role for these two proteins in maintaining physiologic SV clusters.