1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Estimating and interpreting nonlinear receptive field of sensory neural responses with deep neural network models

  1. Menoua Keshishian
  2. Hassan Akbari
  3. Bahar Khalighinejad
  4. Jose L Herrero
  5. Ashesh D Mehta
  6. Nima Mesgarani  Is a corresponding author
  1. Columbia University, United States
  2. Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, United States
  3. Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 8
  • Views 2,306
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e53445 doi: 10.7554/eLife.53445

Abstract

Our understanding of nonlinear stimulus transformations by neural circuits is hindered by the lack of comprehensive yet interpretable computational modeling frameworks. Here, we propose a data-driven approach based on deep neural networks to directly model arbitrarily nonlinear stimulus-response mappings. Reformulating the exact function of a trained neural network as a collection of stimulus-dependent linear functions enables a locally linear receptive field interpretation of the neural network. Predicting the neural responses recorded invasively from the auditory cortex of neurosurgical patients as they listened to speech, this approach significantly improves the prediction accuracy of auditory cortical responses, particularly in nonprimary areas. Moreover, interpreting the functions learned by neural networks uncovered three distinct types of nonlinear transformations of speech that varied considerably from primary to nonprimary auditory regions. The ability of this framework to capture arbitrary stimulus-response mappings while maintaining model interpretability leads to a better understanding of cortical processing of sensory signals.

Data availability

Source data files have been provided for Figures 1-3. Raw data cannot be shared as we do not have ethical approval to share this data. To request access to the data, please contact the corresponding author.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Menoua Keshishian

    Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0368-288X
  2. Hassan Akbari

    Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bahar Khalighinejad

    Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jose L Herrero

    Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ashesh D Mehta

    Deptartment of Neurosurgery, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7293-1101
  6. Nima Mesgarani

    Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    nima@ee.columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2987-759X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NIDCD-DC014279)

  • Menoua Keshishian
  • Hassan Akbari
  • Bahar Khalighinejad

National Institute of Mental Health

  • Jose L Herrero
  • Ashesh D Mehta

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All research protocols were approved and monitored by the institutional review board at the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (IRB-AAAD5482), and informed written consent to participate in research studies was obtained from each patient before electrode implantation.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Thomas Serre, Brown University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: November 8, 2019
  2. Accepted: June 21, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 26, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 9, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Keshishian et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,306
    Page views
  • 303
    Downloads
  • 8
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhengchao Xu et al.
    Tools and Resources Updated

    The dorsal raphe nucleus (DR) and median raphe nucleus (MR) contain populations of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons that regulate diverse behavioral functions. However, their whole-brain input-output circuits remain incompletely elucidated. We used viral tracing combined with fluorescence micro-optical sectioning tomography to generate a comprehensive whole-brain atlas of inputs and outputs of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the DR and MR. We found that these neurons received inputs from similar upstream brain regions. The glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the same raphe nucleus had divergent projection patterns with differences in critical brain regions. Specifically, MR glutamatergic neurons projected to the lateral habenula through multiple pathways. Correlation and cluster analysis revealed that glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the same raphe nucleus received heterogeneous inputs and sent different collateral projections. This connectivity atlas further elucidates the anatomical architecture of the raphe nuclei, which could facilitate better understanding of their behavioral functions.

    1. Neuroscience
    Shankar Ramachandran et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Neuromodulators promote adaptive behaviors that are often complex and involve concerted activity changes across circuits that are often not physically connected. It is not well understood how neuromodulatory systems accomplish these tasks. Here, we show that the Caenorhabditis elegans NLP-12 neuropeptide system shapes responses to food availability by modulating the activity of head and body wall motor neurons through alternate G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) targets, CKR-1 and CKR-2. We show ckr-2 deletion reduces body bend depth during movement under basal conditions. We demonstrate CKR-1 is a functional NLP-12 receptor and define its expression in the nervous system. In contrast to basal locomotion, biased CKR-1 GPCR stimulation of head motor neurons promotes turning during local searching. Deletion of ckr-1 reduces head neuron activity and diminishes turning while specific ckr-1 overexpression or head neuron activation promote turning. Thus, our studies suggest locomotor responses to changing food availability are regulated through conditional NLP-12 stimulation of head or body wall motor circuits.