Suppressing proteasome mediated processing of Topoisomerase II DNA-protein complexes preserves genome integrity

Abstract

Topoisomerase II (TOP2) relieves topological stress in DNA by introducing double-strand breaks (DSBs) via a transient, covalently linked TOP2 DNA-protein intermediate, termed TOP2 cleavage complex (TOP2cc). TOP2ccs are normally rapidly reversible, but can be stabilized by TOP2 poisons, such as the chemotherapeutic agent etoposide (ETO). TOP2 poisons have shown significant variability in their therapeutic effectiveness across different cancers for reasons that remain to be determined. One potential explanation for the differential cellular response to these drugs is in the manner by which cells process TOP2ccs. Cells are thought to remove TOP2ccs primarily by proteolytic degradation followed by DNA DSB repair. Here, we show that proteasome-mediated repair of TOP2cc is highly error-prone. Pre-treating primary splenic mouse B-cells with proteasome inhibitors prevented the proteolytic processing of trapped TOP2ccs, suppressed the DNA damage response (DDR) and completely protected cells from ETO-induced genome instability, thereby preserving cellular viability. When degradation of TOP2cc was suppressed, the TOP2 enzyme uncoupled itself from the DNA following ETO washout, in an error-free manner. This suggests a potential mechanism of developing resistance to topoisomerase poisons by ensuring rapid TOP2cc reversal.

Data availability

Sequencing data has been deposited in GEO under the accession code GSE140372

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicholas Sciascia

    Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4169-4929
  2. Wei Wu

    Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Dali Zong

    Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yilun Sun

    Developmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nancy Wong

    Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sam John

    Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Darawalee Wangsa

    Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Thomas Ried

    Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Samuel F Bunting

    Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yves Pommier

    Developmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. André Nussenzweig

    Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    andre_nussenzweig@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8952-7268

Funding

National Institutes of Health (Intramural Research Program)

  • André Nussenzweig

Ellison Medical Foundation (Senior Scholar in Aging Award AG-SS- 2633-11)

  • André Nussenzweig

Department of Defense Idea Expansion Award (W81XWH-15-2-006)

  • André Nussenzweig

Department of Defense Idea Breakthrough Award (W81XWH-16-1-599)

  • André Nussenzweig

Alex Lemonade Stand Foundation Award

  • André Nussenzweig

National Institutes of Health (Intramural FLEX Award)

  • André Nussenzweig

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Maureen Murphy, The Wistar Institute, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse breeding and experimentation followed protocols approved by the National Institutes of Health Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol Numbers: EIB-064-3 and 17-042).

Version history

  1. Received: November 8, 2019
  2. Accepted: February 12, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 14, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 23, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,870
    views
  • 488
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nicholas Sciascia
  2. Wei Wu
  3. Dali Zong
  4. Yilun Sun
  5. Nancy Wong
  6. Sam John
  7. Darawalee Wangsa
  8. Thomas Ried
  9. Samuel F Bunting
  10. Yves Pommier
  11. André Nussenzweig
(2020)
Suppressing proteasome mediated processing of Topoisomerase II DNA-protein complexes preserves genome integrity
eLife 9:e53447.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53447

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53447

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Lisa Baumgartner, Jonathan J Ipsaro ... Julius Brennecke
    Research Advance

    Members of the diverse heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family play crucial roles in heterochromatin formation and maintenance. Despite the similar affinities of their chromodomains for di- and tri-methylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2/3), different HP1 proteins exhibit distinct chromatin-binding patterns, likely due to interactions with various specificity factors. Previously, we showed that the chromatin-binding pattern of the HP1 protein Rhino, a crucial factor of the Drosophila PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway, is largely defined by a DNA sequence-specific C2H2 zinc finger protein named Kipferl (Baumgartner et al., 2022). Here, we elucidate the molecular basis of the interaction between Rhino and its guidance factor Kipferl. Through phylogenetic analyses, structure prediction, and in vivo genetics, we identify a single amino acid change within Rhino’s chromodomain, G31D, that does not affect H3K9me2/3 binding but disrupts the interaction between Rhino and Kipferl. Flies carrying the rhinoG31D mutation phenocopy kipferl mutant flies, with Rhino redistributing from piRNA clusters to satellite repeats, causing pronounced changes in the ovarian piRNA profile of rhinoG31D flies. Thus, Rhino’s chromodomain functions as a dual-specificity module, facilitating interactions with both a histone mark and a DNA-binding protein.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Yifei Weng, Shiyi Zhou ... Coleen T Murphy
    Research Article

    Cognitive decline is a significant health concern in our aging society. Here, we used the model organism C. elegans to investigate the impact of the IIS/FOXO pathway on age-related cognitive decline. The daf-2 Insulin/IGF-1 receptor mutant exhibits a significant extension of learning and memory span with age compared to wild-type worms, an effect that is dependent on the DAF-16 transcription factor. To identify possible mechanisms by which aging daf-2 mutants maintain learning and memory with age while wild-type worms lose neuronal function, we carried out neuron-specific transcriptomic analysis in aged animals. We observed downregulation of neuronal genes and upregulation of transcriptional regulation genes in aging wild-type neurons. By contrast, IIS/FOXO pathway mutants exhibit distinct neuronal transcriptomic alterations in response to cognitive aging, including upregulation of stress response genes and downregulation of specific insulin signaling genes. We tested the roles of significantly transcriptionally-changed genes in regulating cognitive functions, identifying novel regulators of learning and memory. In addition to other mechanistic insights, a comparison of the aged vs young daf-2 neuronal transcriptome revealed that a new set of potentially neuroprotective genes is upregulated; instead of simply mimicking a young state, daf-2 may enhance neuronal resilience to accumulation of harm and take a more active approach to combat aging. These findings suggest a potential mechanism for regulating cognitive function with age and offer insights into novel therapeutic targets for age-related cognitive decline.