1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Microstructural organization of human insula is linked to its macrofunctional circuitry and predicts cognitive control

  1. Vinod Menon  Is a corresponding author
  2. Guillermo Gallardo
  3. Mark A Pinsk
  4. Van-Dang Nguyen
  5. Jing-Rebecca Li
  6. Weidong Cai
  7. Demian Wassermann  Is a corresponding author
  1. Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
  3. Princeton University, United States
  4. Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden
  5. Inria Centre de Recherche Saclay Île-de-France, France
Research Article
  • Cited 7
  • Views 1,800
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e53470 doi: 10.7554/eLife.53470

Abstract

The human insular cortex is a heterogeneous brain structure which plays an integrative role in guiding behavior. The cytoarchitectonic organization of the human insula has been investigated over the last century using postmortem brains but there has been little progress in noninvasive in vivo mapping of its microstructure and large-scale functional circuitry. Quantitative modeling of multi-shell diffusion MRI data from 413 participants revealed that human insula microstructure differs significantly across subdivisions that serve distinct cognitive and affective functions. Insular microstructural organization was mirrored in its functionally interconnected circuits with the anterior cingulate cortex that anchors the salience network, a system important for adaptive switching of cognitive control systems. Furthermore, insular microstructural features, confirmed in Macaca mulatta, were linked to behavior and predicted individual differences in cognitive control ability. Our findings open new possibilities for probing psychiatric and neurological disorders impacted by insular cortex dysfunction, including autism, schizophrenia, and fronto-temporal dementia.

Data availability

All data used in this study is available in open-source databases. The human data comes from the Human Connectome Project, the primate data is available at the INDI Primate Data Exchange, and the three-dimensional neuronal models are available from the NeuroMorpho website. All custom code is available on GitHub accesible through the Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3759708. All code was developed based on open-source, publicly available software packages.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vinod Menon

    Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, United States
    For correspondence
    menon@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Guillermo Gallardo

    Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mark A Pinsk

    Scully Center for the Neuroscience of Mind & Behavior Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Van-Dang Nguyen

    Computer Science, Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jing-Rebecca Li

    Defi, Inria Centre de Recherche Saclay Île-de-France, Palaiseau, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Weidong Cai

    Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Demian Wassermann

    Parietal, Inria Centre de Recherche Saclay Île-de-France, Palaiseau, France
    For correspondence
    demian.wassermann@inria.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5194-6056

Funding

European Commission (NeuroLang -- 757672)

  • Demian Wassermann

National Institutes of Health (HD094623,HD059205,MH084164)

  • Vinod Menon

National Institutes of Health (MH105625)

  • Weidong Cai

Inria (LargeBrainNets)

  • Demian Wassermann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal data was obtained from the INDI-Prime primate data exchange database collection (http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/indiPRIME.html) . All methods and procedures were approved by the Princeton University IACUC

Human subjects: Data was obtained from the HCP database. Informed consent for this study was not explicitly required. However, subjects signed a written informed consent when the database was constituted. IRB approval was obtained for the database construction with the following details: Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityIRB # 201204036

Reviewing Editor

  1. Timothy E Behrens, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Publication history

  1. Received: November 9, 2019
  2. Accepted: June 3, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 4, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 22, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Menon et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,800
    Page views
  • 333
    Downloads
  • 7
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Tania Moreno-Mármol et al.
    Research Article

    The vertebrate eye-primordium consists of a pseudostratified neuroepithelium, the optic vesicle (OV), in which cells acquire neural retina or retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) fates. As these fates arise, the OV assumes a cup-shape, influenced by mechanical forces generated within the neural retina. Whether the RPE passively adapts to retinal changes or actively contributes to OV morphogenesis remains unexplored. We generated a zebrafish Tg(E1-bhlhe40:GFP) line to track RPE morphogenesis and interrogate its participation in OV folding. We show that, in virtual absence of proliferation, RPE cells stretch and flatten, thereby matching the retinal curvature and promoting OV folding. Localized interference with the RPE cytoskeleton disrupts tissue stretching and OV folding. Thus, extreme RPE flattening and accelerated differentiation are efficient solutions adopted by fast-developing species to enable timely optic cup formation. This mechanism differs in amniotes, in which proliferation drives RPE expansion with a much-reduced need of cell flattening.

    1. Neuroscience
    Pierre-Luc Rochon et al.
    Research Article

    Nearly 50 different mouse retinal ganglion cell (RGC) types sample the visual scene for distinct features. RGC feature selectivity arises from their synapses with a specific subset of amacrine (AC) and bipolar cell (BC) types, but how RGC dendrites arborize and collect input from these specific subsets remains poorly understood. Here we examine the hypothesis that RGCs employ molecular recognition systems to meet this challenge. By combining calcium imaging and type-specific histological stains we define a family of circuits that express the recognition molecule Sidekick 1 (Sdk1) which include a novel RGC type (S1-RGC) that responds to local edges. Genetic and physiological studies revealed that Sdk1 loss selectively disrupts S1-RGC visual responses which result from a loss of excitatory and inhibitory inputs and selective dendritic deficits on this neuron. We conclude that Sdk1 shapes dendrite growth and wiring to help S1-RGCs become feature selective.