Structural basis for ion selectivity in TMEM175 K+ channels

  1. Janine D Brunner  Is a corresponding author
  2. Roman P Jakob
  3. Tobias Schulze
  4. Yvonne Neldner
  5. Anna Moroni
  6. Gerhard Thiel
  7. Timm Maier
  8. Stephan Schenck  Is a corresponding author
  1. VIB, Belgium
  2. University of Basel, Switzerland
  3. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
  4. University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
  5. University of Milan, Italy

Abstract

The TMEM175 family constitutes recently discovered K+ channels that are important for autophagosome turnover and lysosomal pH regulation and are associated with the early onset of Parkinson Disease. TMEM175 channels lack a P-loop selectivity filter, a hallmark of all known K+ channels, raising the question how selectivity is achieved. Here, we report the X-ray structure of a closed bacterial TMEM175 channel in complex with a nanobody fusion-protein disclosing bound K+ ions. Our analysis revealed that a highly conserved layer of threonine residues in the pore conveys a basal K+ selectivity. An additional layer comprising two serines in human TMEM175 increases selectivity further and renders this channel sensitive to 4-aminopyridine and Zn2+. Our findings suggest that large hydrophobic side chains occlude the pore, forming a physical gate, and that channel opening by iris-like motions simultaneously relocates the gate and exposes the otherwise concealed selectivity filter to the pore lumen.

Data availability

Atomic coordinates have been deposited at the Protein Data Bank with thefollowing unique identifiers: 6HD8, 6HD9, 6HDA, 6HDB, 6HDC, 6SWR.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Janine D Brunner

    VIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, VIB, Brussels, Belgium
    For correspondence
    janine.brunner@vub.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4237-9322
  2. Roman P Jakob

    Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tobias Schulze

    Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yvonne Neldner

    Department of Trauma, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anna Moroni

    Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1860-406X
  6. Gerhard Thiel

    Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Timm Maier

    Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7459-1363
  8. Stephan Schenck

    VIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, VIB, Brussels, Belgium
    For correspondence
    stephan.schenck@vub.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (Advanced Grant 495 (AdG) n. 695078 noMAGIC)

  • Anna Moroni
  • Gerhard Thiel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. László Csanády, Semmelweis University, Hungary

Version history

  1. Received: November 16, 2019
  2. Accepted: April 7, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 8, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 22, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: April 24, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Brunner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,893
    Page views
  • 1,502
    Downloads
  • 26
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Janine D Brunner
  2. Roman P Jakob
  3. Tobias Schulze
  4. Yvonne Neldner
  5. Anna Moroni
  6. Gerhard Thiel
  7. Timm Maier
  8. Stephan Schenck
(2020)
Structural basis for ion selectivity in TMEM175 K+ channels
eLife 9:e53683.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53683

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53683

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Sebastian Jojoa-Cruz, Adrienne E Dubin ... Andrew B Ward
    Research Advance

    The dimeric two-pore OSCA/TMEM63 family has recently been identified as mechanically activated ion channels. Previously, based on the unique features of the structure of OSCA1.2, we postulated the potential involvement of several structural elements in sensing membrane tension (Jojoa-Cruz et al., 2018). Interestingly, while OSCA1, 2, and 3 clades are activated by membrane stretch in cell-attached patches (i.e. they are stretch-activated channels), they differ in their ability to transduce membrane deformation induced by a blunt probe (poking). Here, in an effort to understand the domains contributing to mechanical signal transduction, we used cryo-electron microscopy to solve the structure of Arabidopsis thaliana (At) OSCA3.1, which, unlike AtOSCA1.2, only produced stretch- but not poke-activated currents in our initial characterization (Murthy et al., 2018). Mutagenesis and electrophysiological assessment of conserved and divergent putative mechanosensitive features of OSCA1.2 reveal a selective disruption of the macroscopic currents elicited by poking without considerable effects on stretch-activated currents (SAC). Our results support the involvement of the amphipathic helix and lipid-interacting residues in the membrane fenestration in the response to poking. Our findings position these two structural elements as potential sources of functional diversity within the family.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Tien M Phan, Young C Kim ... Jeetain Mittal
    Research Article

    The heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family is a crucial component of heterochromatin with diverse functions in gene regulation, cell cycle control, and cell differentiation. In humans, there are three paralogs, HP1α, HP1β, and HP1γ, which exhibit remarkable similarities in their domain architecture and sequence properties. Nevertheless, these paralogs display distinct behaviors in liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), a process linked to heterochromatin formation. Here, we employ a coarse-grained simulation framework to uncover the sequence features responsible for the observed differences in LLPS. We highlight the significance of the net charge and charge patterning along the sequence in governing paralog LLPS propensities. We also show that both highly conserved folded and less-conserved disordered domains contribute to the observed differences. Furthermore, we explore the potential co-localization of different HP1 paralogs in multicomponent assemblies and the impact of DNA on this process. Importantly, our study reveals that DNA can significantly reshape the stability of a minimal condensate formed by HP1 paralogs due to competitive interactions of HP1α with HP1β and HP1γ versus DNA. In conclusion, our work highlights the physicochemical nature of interactions that govern the distinct phase-separation behaviors of HP1 paralogs and provides a molecular framework for understanding their role in chromatin organization.