Systematic examination of low-intensity ultrasound parameters on human motor cortex excitability and behaviour

  1. Anton Fomenko  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen
  3. Jean-François Nankoo
  4. James Saravanamuttu
  5. Yanqiu Wang
  6. Mazen El-Baba
  7. Xue Xia
  8. Shakthi Sanjana Seerala
  9. Kullervo Hynynen
  10. Andres M Lozano  Is a corresponding author
  11. Robert Chen  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Toronto, Canada
  2. National Taiwan University, Taiwan
  3. Toronto Western Hospital, Canada
  4. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Canada

Abstract

Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound (TUS) can non-invasively modulate human neural activity. We investigated how different fundamental sonication parameters influence the effects of TUS on the motor cortex (M1) of 16 healthy subjects by probing cortico-cortical excitability and behaviour. A low-intensity 500 kHz TUS transducer was coupled to a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil. TMS was delivered 10 ms before the end of TUS to the left M1 hotspot of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Varying acoustic parameters (pulse repetition frequency, duty cycle and sonication duration) on motor-evoked potential amplitude were examined. Paired-pulse measures of cortical inhibition and facilitation, and performance on a visuomotor task was also assessed. TUS safely suppressed TMS-elicited motor cortical activity, with longer sonication durations and shorter duty cycles when delivered in a blocked paradigm. TUS increased GABAA-mediated short-interval intracortical inhibition and decreased reaction time on visuomotor task but not when controlled with TUS at near-somatosensory threshold intensity.

Data availability

Data used for this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.Files for 3D printing the stimulating devices and custom MATLAB scripts used for stimulation have been deposited into a cited GitHub repository.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anton Fomenko

    Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    anton.fomenko@uhnresearch.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4131-6784
  2. Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen

    Neurology, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jean-François Nankoo

    Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. James Saravanamuttu

    Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yanqiu Wang

    Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mazen El-Baba

    Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Xue Xia

    Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shakthi Sanjana Seerala

    Focused Ultrasound Group, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kullervo Hynynen

    Focused Ultrasound Group, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Andres M Lozano

    Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    lozano@uhnresearch.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Robert Chen

    Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    robert.chen@uhn.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Banting and Best Doctoral Award)

  • Anton Fomenko

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Foundation Grant,FDN 154292)

  • Robert Chen

University of Manitoba (Clinician Investigator Program)

  • Anton Fomenko

Canada Research Chairs (Neuroscience)

  • Andres M Lozano

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All patients gave written informed consent and the protocol was approved by the UHN Research Ethics Board (Protocol #18-5082) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki on the use of human subjects in experiments.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Laura Dugué, Uni­ver­sité de Paris, France

Version history

  1. Received: December 16, 2019
  2. Accepted: November 24, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 25, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 10, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Fomenko et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,288
    Page views
  • 578
    Downloads
  • 49
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anton Fomenko
  2. Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen
  3. Jean-François Nankoo
  4. James Saravanamuttu
  5. Yanqiu Wang
  6. Mazen El-Baba
  7. Xue Xia
  8. Shakthi Sanjana Seerala
  9. Kullervo Hynynen
  10. Andres M Lozano
  11. Robert Chen
(2020)
Systematic examination of low-intensity ultrasound parameters on human motor cortex excitability and behaviour
eLife 9:e54497.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54497

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Connon I Thomas, Melissa A Ryan ... Benjamin Scholl
    Research Article

    Postsynaptic mitochondria are critical for the development, plasticity, and maintenance of synaptic inputs. However, their relationship to synaptic structure and functional activity is unknown. We examined a correlative dataset from ferret visual cortex with in vivo two-photon calcium imaging of dendritic spines during visual stimulation and electron microscopy reconstructions of spine ultrastructure, investigating mitochondrial abundance near functionally and structurally characterized spines. Surprisingly, we found no correlation to structural measures of synaptic strength. Instead, we found that mitochondria are positioned near spines with orientation preferences that are dissimilar to the somatic preference. Additionally, we found that mitochondria are positioned near groups of spines with heterogeneous orientation preferences. For a subset of spines with a mitochondrion in the head or neck, synapses were larger and exhibited greater selectivity to visual stimuli than those without a mitochondrion. Our data suggest mitochondria are not necessarily positioned to support the energy needs of strong spines, but rather support the structurally and functionally diverse inputs innervating the basal dendrites of cortical neurons.

    1. Neuroscience
    Weiwei Qui, Chelsea R Hutch ... Darleen Sandoval
    Research Article

    Several discrete groups of feeding-regulated neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (nucleus tractus solitarius; NTS) suppress food intake, including avoidance-promoting neurons that express Cck (NTSCck cells) and distinct Lepr- and Calcr-expressing neurons (NTSLepr and NTSCalcr cells, respectively) that suppress food intake without promoting avoidance. To test potential synergies among these cell groups we manipulated multiple NTS cell populations simultaneously. We found that activating multiple sets of NTS neurons (e.g., NTSLepr plus NTSCalcr (NTSLC), or NTSLC plus NTSCck (NTSLCK)) suppressed feeding more robustly than activating single populations. While activating groups of cells that include NTSCck neurons promoted conditioned taste avoidance (CTA), NTSLC activation produced no CTA despite abrogating feeding. Thus, the ability to promote CTA formation represents a dominant effect but activating multiple non-aversive populations augments the suppression of food intake without provoking avoidance. Furthermore, silencing multiple NTS neuron groups augmented food intake and body weight to a greater extent than silencing single populations, consistent with the notion that each of these NTS neuron populations plays crucial and cumulative roles in the control of energy balance. We found that silencing NTSLCK neurons failed to blunt the weight-loss response to vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and that feeding activated many non-NTSLCK neurons, however, suggesting that as-yet undefined NTS cell types must make additional contributions to the restraint of feeding.